Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Study of clinical diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia
1Department of Gynecologic oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
2Department of pathology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Wu E-mail: yumeiwu129@yeah.net
Objective: To preliminarily evaluate the clinical significance of different methods in diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN). Materials and Methods: Clinical manifestations, ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT), cervical biopsy, and pathological features of 106 patients with CGIN admitted to Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital between 2008 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Among 146 cases diagnosed with CGIN, 87 (59.6%) had L-CGIN and 59 (40.4%) H-CGIN. Thirty-seven patients (25.6%) were found to have simple CGIN and 109 (74.6%) had CGIN complicated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). TCT revealed atypical glandular cells (AGC) in 20 patients (13.7%), six of whom had L-CGIN (6.9%) and 14 (23.7%) had H-CGIN with statistical significance between two groups (p < 0.05). TCT detected AGC in 13 cases (35.1%) with simple CGIN and seven with mixed CGIN (6.4%) (P<0.05). Endocervical curettage (ECC) revealed AGC abnormality in ten cases (25.6%). Cervical biopsy under colposcope revealed 32 patients (22.9%) had CGIN, including 15 L-CGIN (18.3%), and 17 H-CGIN (29.3%) with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). Among those diagnosed with CGIN by colposcope-assisted cervical biopsy, 19 (51.4%) had simple CGIN and 13 (11.9%) mixed CGIN (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative diagnostic rate of simple CGIN was higher than CGIN complicated with CIN
Cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia; Endocervical glandular dysplsia; Diagnosis.
S. Yang,W. Duan,W. Kong,L. Zhu,Y. Wu. Study of clinical diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(4);539-542.
[1] Liu W.X., Chen Y., Yang G.M.: “Analysis of the clinical and prognostic correlation factors for 144 cases of invasive cervical adenocarcinoma”. Chin. J. Clin. Oncol,, 2011, 38, 664.
[2] Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists and the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: “Histopathology reporting in cervical screening”. Sheffield, 1999, 16. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/archived-nhscsp10-1st-edition.pdf
[3] Chen L.Z., Shen D.H.: “Pathological problems of cervical intraepithelial neplasia”. Chin. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2011, 46, 76.
[4] Sláma J., Freitag P., Cibula D., Fischerová D., Janousek M., Pavlista D., et al.: “Glandular premalignant lesions of the uterine cervix”. Ceska. Gynekol., 2006, 71, 446. (Article in Czech).
[5] Ovanin-Raki A., Mahovlić V., Audy-Jurković S., Barisić A., Skopljanac- Macina L., Jurić D., et al.: “Cytology of cervical intraepithelial glandular lesions”. Coll. Antropol., 2010, 34, 401.
[6] El-Ghobashy A.A., Shaaban A.M., Herod J., Herrington C.S.: “The Pathology and management of endocervical glandular neoplasia”. Int. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 583.
[7] Li Q., Feng W.W.: “Research progress of cervical adenocarcinoma”. J. Int. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 39, 330.
[8] Bao D.M., Shen D.H.: “Glandular neoplasia of cervix”. Chin. J. Pathol., 2006, 35, 744.
[9] Lee K.R., Darragh T.M., Joste N.E., Krane J.F., Sherman M.E., Hurley L.B., et al.: “Atypical glandular cells of undertermined significance: interobserver reproducibility in cervical smear and corresponding thin–layer preparations”. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 2002, 117, 96.
[10] Moreira M.A., Longatto Filho A., Castelo A., de Barros M.R., Silva A.P., Thomann P., et al.: “How accurate is cytological diagnosis of cervical glandular lesions?” Diagn. Cytopathol., 2008, 36, 270.
[11] Zhang W.H., Li H., Li X.G.: “Glandular neoplasia of cervix”. Chin. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 5, 408.
[12] Ullal A., Roberts M., Bulmer J.N., Mathers M.E., Wadehra V.: “The role cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia”. Cytopathology, 2009, 20, 359.
[13] Finall A.I., Olafsdottir R.: “Outcomes of cervical liquid-based cytology suggesting a glandular abnormality”. Cytopathology, 2009, 29, 367.
[14] Kietpeerakool C., Srisomboon J., Prompittayarat W., Kanjanavaha P., Peuwsai R., Dheerakul C.: “Can adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix be predicted before cervical conization”? Asian. Pac. J. Cancer. Prev., 2006, 7, 522.
[15] Ovanin-Raki A., Mahovlić V., Audy-Jurković S., Barisić A., Skopljanac- Macina L., Jurić D., et al.: “Cytology of cervical intraepithelial glandular lesions”. Coll. Antropol., 2010, 34, 401.
Top