Article Data

  • Views 507
  • Dowloads 120

Original Research

Open Access

Study of clinical diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia

  • S. Yang1
  • W. Duan1
  • W. Kong1
  • L. Zhu2
  • Y. Wu1,*,

1Department of Gynecologic oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

2Department of pathology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3026.2016 Vol.37,Issue 4,August 2016 pp.539-542

Published: 10 August 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Wu E-mail: yumeiwu129@yeah.net

Abstract

Objective: To preliminarily evaluate the clinical significance of different methods in diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN). Materials and Methods: Clinical manifestations, ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT), cervical biopsy, and pathological features of 106 patients with CGIN admitted to Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital between 2008 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Among 146 cases diagnosed with CGIN, 87 (59.6%) had L-CGIN and 59 (40.4%) H-CGIN. Thirty-seven patients (25.6%) were found to have simple CGIN and 109 (74.6%) had CGIN complicated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). TCT revealed atypical glandular cells (AGC) in 20 patients (13.7%), six of whom had L-CGIN (6.9%) and 14 (23.7%) had H-CGIN with statistical significance between two groups (p < 0.05). TCT detected AGC in 13 cases (35.1%) with simple CGIN and seven with mixed CGIN (6.4%) (P<0.05). Endocervical curettage (ECC) revealed AGC abnormality in ten cases (25.6%). Cervical biopsy under colposcope revealed 32 patients (22.9%) had CGIN, including 15 L-CGIN (18.3%), and 17 H-CGIN (29.3%) with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). Among those diagnosed with CGIN by colposcope-assisted cervical biopsy, 19 (51.4%) had simple CGIN and 13 (11.9%) mixed CGIN (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative diagnostic rate of simple CGIN was higher than CGIN complicated with CIN

Keywords

Cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia; Endocervical glandular dysplsia; Diagnosis.

Cite and Share

S. Yang,W. Duan,W. Kong,L. Zhu,Y. Wu. Study of clinical diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(4);539-542.

References

[1] Liu W.X., Chen Y., Yang G.M.: “Analysis of the clinical and prognostic correlation factors for 144 cases of invasive cervical adenocarcinoma”. Chin. J. Clin. Oncol,, 2011, 38, 664.

[2] Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists and the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: “Histopathology reporting in cervical screening”. Sheffield, 1999, 16. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/archived-nhscsp10-1st-edition.pdf

[3] Chen L.Z., Shen D.H.: “Pathological problems of cervical intraepithelial neplasia”. Chin. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2011, 46, 76.

[4] Sláma J., Freitag P., Cibula D., Fischerová D., Janousek M., Pavlista D., et al.: “Glandular premalignant lesions of the uterine cervix”. Ceska. Gynekol., 2006, 71, 446. (Article in Czech).

[5] Ovanin-Raki A., Mahovlić V., Audy-Jurković S., Barisić A., Skopljanac- Macina L., Jurić D., et al.: “Cytology of cervical intraepithelial glandular lesions”. Coll. Antropol., 2010, 34, 401.

[6] El-Ghobashy A.A., Shaaban A.M., Herod J., Herrington C.S.: “The Pathology and management of endocervical glandular neoplasia”. Int. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 583.

[7] Li Q., Feng W.W.: “Research progress of cervical adenocarcinoma”. J. Int. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 39, 330.

[8] Bao D.M., Shen D.H.: “Glandular neoplasia of cervix”. Chin. J. Pathol., 2006, 35, 744.

[9] Lee K.R., Darragh T.M., Joste N.E., Krane J.F., Sherman M.E., Hurley L.B., et al.: “Atypical glandular cells of undertermined significance: interobserver reproducibility in cervical smear and corresponding thin–layer preparations”. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 2002, 117, 96.

[10] Moreira M.A., Longatto Filho A., Castelo A., de Barros M.R., Silva A.P., Thomann P., et al.: “How accurate is cytological diagnosis of cervical glandular lesions?” Diagn. Cytopathol., 2008, 36, 270.

[11] Zhang W.H., Li H., Li X.G.: “Glandular neoplasia of cervix”. Chin. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 5, 408.

[12] Ullal A., Roberts M., Bulmer J.N., Mathers M.E., Wadehra V.: “The role cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia”. Cytopathology, 2009, 20, 359.

[13] Finall A.I., Olafsdottir R.: “Outcomes of cervical liquid-based cytology suggesting a glandular abnormality”. Cytopathology, 2009, 29, 367.

[14] Kietpeerakool C., Srisomboon J., Prompittayarat W., Kanjanavaha P., Peuwsai R., Dheerakul C.: “Can adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix be predicted before cervical conization”? Asian. Pac. J. Cancer. Prev., 2006, 7, 522.

[15] Ovanin-Raki A., Mahovlić V., Audy-Jurković S., Barisić A., Skopljanac- Macina L., Jurić D., et al.: “Cytology of cervical intraepithelial glandular lesions”. Coll. Antropol., 2010, 34, 401.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top