Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
The significance of the pluripotency and cancer stem cell-related marker NANOG in diagnosis and treatment of ovarian carcinoma
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
2Reproductive Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
3Unit of Gynecologic Pathology and Cytology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
*Corresponding Author(s): Š. Smrkolj E-mail: spela.smrkolj@mf.uni-lj.si
Ovarian cancer is among the most common gynecologic cancers and unfortunately the most common cause of death from gynecologic malignancies. Due to few early symptoms and insufficient screening programs, an early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is very difficult and new biomarkers related to early ovarian carcinogenesis are needed. In the last years a growing scientific knowledge about cancer stem cells and their markers opened a new perspective on screening and early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. The transcription factor NANOG is not only a pluripotency and cancer stem cell-related marker, but also promotes cancer stem cell-like characteristics of tumor, tumor growth, dissemination, immune evasion, and resistance to conventional therapy. The recent data showed that small stem cells resembling very small embryonic-like stem cells are present in the ovarian surface epithelium of adult human ovaries. These cells expressed several genes related to primordial germ cells, germinal lineage, and pluripotency, including NANOG, therefore their involvement in the manifestation of ovarian cancer are not excluded. As majority of cancer cells within a tumor are non tumorigenic, the therapies targeting these cells cause tumor regression, but the survived cancer stem cells regenerate the tumor, so tumor relapse or reoccur. The eradication of cancer actually requires the elimination of cancer stem cells, therefore new strategies in treatment that specifically target cancer stem cells are urgently needed. Although the therapeutic efficacy of targeting NANOG as a cancer treatment method is still in experimental phase, the gene therapy with small interfering RNA or short hairpin RNA have already shown some promising therapeutic potential. The authors can conclude that NANOG represents a promising diagnostic marker and agent for target therapy of ovarian cancer.
Ovarian cancer; Cancer stem cells; NANOG; Chemoresistance; Target therapy.
N. Kenda Šuster,I. Virant-Klun,S. Frković Grazio,Š. Smrkolj. The significance of the pluripotency and cancer stem cell-related marker NANOG in diagnosis and treatment of ovarian carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(5);604-612.
[1] “Cancer in Slovenia 2010”. Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana,
Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Cancer Registry of Republic
of Slovenia, 2013.
[2] Tavassoli F.A., Devilee P.: “Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of
the Breast and Female Genital Organs”. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003.
[3] Berek J.S., Novak E.: “Berek & Novak's gynecology”. 14
th
ed.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007, xxii.
[4] Romero I., Bast R.C. Jr.: “Minireview: human ovarian cancer: biology,
current management, and paths to personalizing therapy”. Endocrinology
, 2012, 153, 1593.
[5] Saad A.F., Hu W., Sood A.K.: “Microenvironment and pathogenesis
of epithelial ovarian cancer”. Horm. Cancer. 2010, 1, 277.
[6] Kurman R.J., Shih Ie M.: “The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial
ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory”. Am J Surg Pathol., 2010,
34, 433.
[7] Kurman R.J., Shih Ie M.: “Pathogenesis of ovarian cancer: lessons
from morphology and molecular biology and their clinical implications”.
Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2008, 27, 151.
[8] Guth U., Huang D.J., Bauer G., Stieger M., Wight E., Singer G.:
“Metastatic patterns at autopsy in patients with ovarian carcinoma”.
Cancer, 2007, 110, 1272.
[9] Wicha M.S., Liu S., Dontu G.: “Cancer stem cells: an old idea--a
paradigm shift”. Cancer Res., 2006, 66, 1883.
[10] Clarke M.F., Dick J.E., Dirks P.B., Eaves C.J., Jamieson C.H., Jones
D.L., et al.: “Cancer stem cells--perspectives on current status and
future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells”. Cancer
Res., 2006, 66, 9339..
[11] Reya T., Morrison S.J., Clarke M.F., Weissman I.L.: “Stem cells,
cancer, and cancer stem cells”. Nature, 2001, 414, 105.
[12] Molofsky A.V., Pardal R., Morrison S.J.: “Diverse mechanisms regulate
stem cell self-renewal”. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol., 2004, 16, 700.
[13] Visvader J.E., Lindeman G.J.: “Cancer stem cells in solid tumours:
accumulating evidence and unresolved questions”. Nat. Rev. Cancer
, 2008, 8, 755.
[14] Miki J., Furusato B., Li H., Gu Y., Takahashi H., Egawa S., et al.:
“Identification of putative stem cell markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in
hTERT-immortalized primary nonmalignant and malignant tumorderived
human prostate epithelial cell lines and in prostate cancer
specimens”. Cancer Res., 2007, 67, 3153.
[15] Charafe-Jauffret E., Ginestier C., Iovino F., Wicinski J., Cervera N.,
Finetti P., et al.: “Breast cancer cell lines contain functional cancer
stem cells with metastatic capacity and a distinct molecular signature”.
Cancer Res., 2009, 69, 1302.
[16] Dontu G., Abdallah W.M., Foley J.M., Jackson K.W., Clarke M.F.,
Kawamura M.J., Wicha M.S.: “In vitro propagation and transcriptional
profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells”. Genes
Dev., 2003, 17, 1253.
[17] Widschwendter M., Fiegl H., Egle D., Mueller-Holzner E., Spizzo
G., Marth C., et al.: “Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer”. Nat.
Genet., 2007, 39, 157
[18] Al-Hajj M., Wicha M.S., Benito-Hernandez A., Morrison S.J., Clarke
M.F.: “Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells”.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 2003, 100, 3983.
[19] Fillmore C.M., Kuperwasser C.: “Human breast cancer cell lines
contain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically
diverse progeny and survive chemotherapy”. Breast Cancer Res.,
2008, 10, R25.
[20] Ibrahim E.E., Babaei-Jadidi R., Saadeddin A., Spencer-Dene B.,
Hossaini S., Abuzinadah M., et al.: “Embryonic NANOG activity
defines colorectal cancer stem cells and modulates through AP1- and
TCF-dependent mechanisms”. Stem Cells, 2012, 30, 2076
[21] Hill R.P.: “Identifying cancer stem cells in solid tumors: case not
proven”. Cancer Res., 2006, 66, 1891.
[22] Vogel G.: “Stem cells. 'Stemness' genes still elusive”. Science, 2003,
302, 371.
[23] McNiece I.: “The CD34+Thy1+ cell population: are they all stem
cells?” Exp. Hematol., 2000, 28, 1312.
[24] Virant-Klun I., Stimpfel M., Cvjeticanin B., Vrtacnik-Bokal E.,
Skutella T.: “Small SSEA-4-positive cells from human ovarian cell
cultures: related to embryonic stem cells and germinal lineage?” J.
Ovarian Res., 2013, 6, 24.
[25] Virant-Klun I., Skutella T., Hren M., Gruden K., Cvjeticanin B.,
Vogler A., Sinkovec J.: “Isolation of small SSEA-4-positive putative
stem cells from the ovarian surface epithelium of adult human
ovaries by two different methods”. Biomed. Res. Int., 2013, 2013,
690415
[26] Bonnet D., Dick J.E.: “Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized
as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell”.
Nat. Med., 1997, 3, 730.
[27] Eramo A., Lotti F., Sette G., Pilozzi E., Biffoni M., Di Virgilio A., et
al.: “Identification and expansion of the tumorigenic lung cancer
stem cell population”. Cell Death Differ., 2008, 15, 504.
[28] Jiang F., Qiu Q., Khanna A., Todd N.W., Deepak J., Xing L., et al.:
“Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a tumor stem cell-associated marker
in lung cancer”. Mol. Cancer Res., 2009, 7, 330.
[29] Lee T.K., Castilho A., Cheung V.C., Tang K.H., Ma S., Ng I.O.:
“CD24(+) liver tumor-initiating cells drive self-renewal and tumor
initiation through STAT3-mediated NANOG regulation”. Cell Stem
Cell, 2011, 9, 50.
[30] Bussolati B., Bruno S., Grange C., Ferrando U., Camussi G.: “Identification
of a tumor-initiating stem cell population in human renal
carcinomas”. FASEB J., 2008, 22, 3696.
[31] Virant-Klun I., Zech N., Rozman P., Vogler A., Cvjeticanin B., Klemenc
P., et al.: “Putative stem cells with an embryonic character isolated
from the ovarian surface epithelium of women with no
naturally present follicles and oocytes”. Differentiation, 2008, 76,
843.
[32] Virant-Klun I., Skutella T., Cvjeticanin B., Stimpfel M., Sinkovec
J.: “Serous papillary adenocarcinoma possibly related to the presence
of primitive oocyte-like cells in the adult ovarian surface epithelium:
a case report”. J. Ovarian Res., 2011, 4, 13.
[33] Pan Y., Jiao J., Zhou C., Cheng Q., Hu Y., Chen H.: “Nanog is highly
expressed in ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and correlated with
clinical stage and pathological grade”. Pathobiology, 2010, 77, 283.
[34] Lee M., Nam E.J., Kim S.W., Kim S., Kim J.H., Kim Y.T.: “Prognostic
impact of the cancer stem cell-related marker NANOG in
ovarian serous carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2012, 22, 1489
[35] Siu M.K., Wong E.S., Kong D.S., Chan H.Y., Jiang L., Wong O.G., et
al.: “Stem cell transcription factor NANOG controls cell migration and
invasion via dysregulation of E-cadherin and FoxJ1 and contributes to
adverse clinical outcome in ovarian cancers”. Oncogene, 2013, 32,
3500.
[36] Amsterdam A., Raanan C., Schreiber L., Freyhan O., Schechtman L.,
Givol D.: “Localization of the stem cell markers LGR5 and Nanog in
the normal and the cancerous human ovary and their inter-relationship”.
Acta Histochem., 2013, 115, 330
[37] Silva I.A., Bai S., McLean K., Yang K., Griffith K., Thomas D., et
al.: “Aldehyde dehydrogenase in combination with CD133 defines
angiogenic ovarian cancer stem cells that portend poor patient survival”.
Cancer Res., 2011, 71, 3991.
[38] Yin A.H., Miraglia S., Zanjani E.D., Almeida-Porada G., Ogawa M.,
Leary A.G., et al.: “AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic
stem and progenitor cells”. Blood, 1997, 90, 5002.
[39] Shackleton M., Vaillant F., Simpson K.J., Stingl J., Smyth G.K., Asselin-
Labat M.L., et al.: “Generation of a functional mammary gland
from a single stem cell”. Nature, 2006, 439, 84.
[40] Szotek P.P., Pieretti-Vanmarcke R., Masiakos P.T., Dinulescu D.M.,
Connolly D., Foster R., et al.: “Ovarian cancer side population defines
cells with stem cell-like characteristics and Mullerian Inhibiting
Substance responsiveness”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 2006,
103, 11154.
[41] Mitsui K., Tokuzawa Y., Itoh H., Segawa K., Murakami M., Takahashi
K., et al.: “The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance
of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells”. Cell, 2003,
113, 631.
[42] Chambers I., Colby D., Robertson M., Nichols J., Lee S., Tweedie S.,
Smith A.: “Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency
sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells”. Cell, 2003, 113, 643.
[43] Hyslop L., Stojkovic M., Armstrong L., Walter T., Stojkovic P., Przyborski
S., et al.: “Downregulation of NANOG induces differentiation
of human embryonic stem cells to extraembryonic lineages”. Stem
Cells, 2005, 23, 1035.
[44] Wang J., Rao S., Chu J., Shen X., Levasseur D.N., Theunissen T.W.,
Orkin S.H.: “A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic
stem cells”. Nature, 2006, 444, 364.
[45] Kashyap V., Rezende N.C., Scotland K.B., Shaffer S.M., Persson
J.L., Gudas L.J., Mongan N.P.: “Regulation of stem cell pluripotency
and differentiation involves a mutual regulatory circuit of the
NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 pluripotency transcription factors with
polycomb repressive complexes and stem cell microRNAs”. Stem.
Cells Dev., 2009, 18, 1093.
[46] Wang J., Levasseur D.N., Orkin S.H.: “Requirement of Nanog
dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency”. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U S A, 2008, 105, 6326.
[47] Pan G., Thomson J.A.: “Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic
stem cell pluripotency”. Cell Res., 2007, 17, 42.
[48] Booth H.A., Holland P.W.: “Eleven daughters of NANOG”. Genomics
, 2004, 84, 229.
[49] Zhang J., Wang X., Li M., Han J., Chen B., Wang B., Dai J.:
“NANOGP8 is a retrogene expressed in cancers”. FEBS J., 2006,
273, 1723.
[50] Fairbanks D.J., Fairbanks A.D., Ogden T.H., Parker G.J., Maughan
P.J.: “NANOGP8: evolution of a human-specific retro-oncogene”.
G3 (Bethesda), 2012, 2, 1447.
[51] Jeter C.R., Badeaux M., Choy G., Chandra D., Patrawala L., Liu C.,
et al.: “Functional evidence that the self-renewal gene NANOG regulates
human tumor development”. Stem Cells, 2009, 27, 993.
[52] Oh J.H., Do H.J., Yang H.M., Moon S.Y., Cha K.Y., Chung H.M.,
Kim J.H.: “Identification of a putative transactivation domain in
human Nanog”. Exp. Mol. Med., 2005, 37, 250.
[53] Do H.J., Lim H.Y., Kim J.H., Song H., Chung H.M., Kim J.H.: “An
intact homeobox domain is required for complete nuclear localization
of human Nanog”. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2007, 353,
770.
[54] Park I.H., Zhao R., West J.A., Yabuuchi A., Huo H., Ince T.A., et al.:
“Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined
factors”. Nature, 2008, 451, 141.
[55] Kuroda T., Tada M., Kubota H., Kimura H., Hatano S.Y., Suemori
H., et al.: “Octamer and Sox elements are required for transcriptional
cis regulation of Nanog gene expression”. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2005, 25,
2475
[56] Theunissen T.W., Costa Y., Radzisheuskaya A., van Oosten A.L.,
Lavial F., Pain B., et al.: “Reprogramming capacity of Nanog is functionally
conserved in vertebrates and resides in a unique homeodomain”.
Development, 2011, 138, 4853.
[57] Hart A.H., Hartley L., Parker K., Ibrahim M., Looijenga L.H., Pauchnik
M., et al.: “The pluripotency homeobox gene NANOG is expressed
in human germ cell tumors”. Cancer, 2005, 104, 2092.
[58] Ezeh U.I., Turek P.J., Reijo R.A., Clark A.T.: “Human embryonic
stem cell genes OCT4, NANOG, STELLAR, and GDF3 are expressed
in both seminoma and breast carcinoma”. Cancer, 2005, 104,
2255.
[59] Hoei-Hansen C.E., Almstrup K., Nielsen J.E., Brask Sonne S.,
Graem N., Skakkebaek N.E., et al.: “Stem cell pluripotency factor
NANOG is expressed in human fetal gonocytes, testicular carcinoma
in situ and germ cell tumours”. Histopathology, 2005, 47, 48.
[60] Gillis A.J., Stoop H., Biermann K., van Gurp R.J., Swartzman E.,
Cribbes S., et al.: “Expression and interdependencies of pluripotency
factors LIN28, OCT3/4, NANOG and SOX2 in human testicular
germ cells and tumours of the testis”. Int. J. Androl., 2011, 34, e160.
[61] Han J., Zhang F., Yu M., Zhao P., Ji W., Zhang H., et al.: “RNA interference-
mediated silencing of NANOG reduces cell proliferation
and induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells”. Cancer
Lett., 2012, 321, 80.
[62] Choi S.C., Choi J.H., Park C.Y., Ahn C.M., Hong S.J., Lim D.S.:
“Nanog regulates molecules involved in stemness and cell cycle-signaling
pathway for maintenance of pluripotency of P19 embryonal
carcinoma stem cells”. J. Cell Physiol., 2012, 227, 3678.
[63] Noh K.H., Kim B.W., Song K.H., Cho H., Lee Y.H., Kim J.H., et al.:
“Nanog signaling in cancer promotes stem-like phenotype and immune
evasion”. J. Clin. Invest., 2012, 122, 4077.
[64] Gu T.T., Liu S.Y., Zheng P.S.: “Cytoplasmic NANOG-positive stromal
cells promote human cervical cancer progression”. Am. J.
Pathol., 2012, 181, 652.
[65] Ozols R.F.: “Update on the management of ovarian cancer”. Cancer
J., 2002, 8, S22.
[66] Odicino F., Pecorelli S., Zigliani L., Creasman W.T.: “History of the
FIGO cancer staging system”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2008, 101,
205.
[67] Stuart G.C., Kitchener H., Bacon M., duBois A., Friedlander M., Ledermann
J., et al.: “2010 Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG)
consensus statement on clinical trials in ovarian cancer: report from
the Fourth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference”. Int. J. Gynecol.
Cancer, 2011, 21, 750.
[68] Colombo N., Pecorelli S.: “What have we learned from ICON1 and
ACTION?” Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2003, 13, 140.
[69] Vergote I., Trope C.G., Amant F., Kristensen G.B., Ehlen T., Johnson
N., et al.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage
IIIC or IV ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, 363, 943.
[70] Bookman M.A., Brady M.F., McGuire W.P., Harper P.G., Alberts
D.S., Friedlander M., et al.: “Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment
regimens in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Phase III Trial of
the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 1419
[71] Perren T.J., Swart A.M., Pfisterer J., Ledermann J.A., Pujade-Lauraine
E., Kristensen G., et al.: “A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in
ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2011, 365, 2484.
[72] Burger R.A., Brady M.F., Bookman M.A., Fleming G.F., Monk B.J.,
Huang H., et al.: “Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment
of ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2011, 365, 2473.
[73] Blagosklonny M.V.: “Cancer stem cell and cancer stemloids: from
biology to therapy”. Cancer Biol. Ther., 2007, 6, 1684.
[74] Ishii H., Iwatsuki M., Ieta K., Ohta D., Haraguchi N., Mimori K.,
Mori M.: “Cancer stem cells and chemoradiation resistance”. Cancer
Sci., 2008, 99, 1871.
[75] Dean M.: “ABC transporters, drug resistance, and cancer stem cells”.
J Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 2009, 14, 3.
[76] Bourguignon L.Y., Peyrollier K., Xia W., Gilad E.: “Hyaluronan-
CD44 interaction activates stem cell marker Nanog, Stat-3-
mediated MDR1 gene expression, and ankyrin-regulated multidrug
efflux in breast and ovarian tumor cells”. J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283,
17635
[77] Fraser M., Bai T., Tsang B.K.: “Akt promotes cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cells through inhibition of p53 phosphorylation
and nuclear function”. Int. J. Cancer, 2008, 122, 534
[78] Nikolaev A.Y., Li M., Puskas N., Qin J., Gu W.: “Parc: a cytoplasmic
anchor for p53”. Cell, 2003, 112, 29.
[79] Woo M.G., Xue K., Liu J., McBride H., Tsang B.K.: “Calpain-mediated
processing of p53-associated parkin-like cytoplasmic protein
(PARC) affects chemosensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells by
promoting p53 subcellular trafficking”. J. Biol. Chem., 2012, 287,
3963.
[80] Wallace-Brodeur R.R., Lowe S.W.: “Clinical implications of p53
mutations”. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 1999, 55, 64.
[81] Noh K.H., Lee Y.H., Jeon J.H., Kang T.H., Mao C.P., Wu T.C., Kim
T.W.: “Cancer vaccination drives Nanog-dependent evolution of
tumor cells toward an immune-resistant and stem-like phenotype”.
Cancer Res., 2012, 72, 1717
[82] De Stefano I., Battaglia A., Zannoni G.F., Prisco M.G., Fattorossi A.,
Travaglia D., et al.: “Hyaluronic acid-paclitaxel: effects of intraperitoneal
administration against CD44(+) human ovarian cancer
xenografts”. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 2011, 68, 107.
[83] Su D., Deng H., Zhao X., Zhang X., Chen L., Chen X., et al.: “Targeting
CD24 for treatment of ovarian cancer by short hairpin RNA”.
Cytotherapy, 2009, 11, 642.
[84] Davis M.E., Chen Z.G., Shin D.M.: “Nanoparticle therapeutics: an
emerging treatment modality for cancer”. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.,
2008, 7, 771.
[85] Landen C.N. Jr., Goodman B., Katre A.A., Steg A.D., Nick A.M.,
Stone R.L., et al.: “Targeting aldehyde dehydrogenase cancer stem
cells in ovarian cancer”. Mol. Cancer Ther., 2010, 9, 3186.
[86] Whitworth J.M., Londono-Joshi A.I., Sellers J.C., Oliver P.J., Muccio
D.D., Atigadda V.R., et al.: “The impact of novel retinoids in combination
with platinum chemotherapy on ovarian cancer stem cells”. Gynecol.
Oncol., 2012, 125, 226.
[87] Ruiz-Vela A., Aguilar-Gallardo C., Martinez-Arroyo A.M., Soriano-
Navarro M., Ruiz V., Simon C.: “Specific unsaturated fatty acids enforce
the transdifferentiation of human cancer cells toward
adipocyte-like cells”. Stem Cell Rev., 2011, 7, 898
[88] Jain A.K., Allton K., Iacovino M., Mahen E., Milczarek R.J., Zwaka
T.P., et al.: “p53 regulates cell cycle and microRNAs to promote differentiation
of human embryonic stem cells”. PLoS Biol., 2012, 10,
e1001268.
[89] Yu Z., Li Y., Fan H., Liu Z., Pestell R.G.: “miRNAs regulate stem
cell self-renewal and differentiation”. Front. Genet., 2012, 3, 191.
[90] Zhang J., Espinoza L.A., Kinders R.J., Lawrence S.M., Pfister T.D.,
Zhou M., et al.: “NANOG modulates stemness in human colorectal
cancer”. Oncogene, 2013, 32, 4397.
[91] Du Y., Shi L., Wang T., Liu Z., Wang Z.: “Nanog siRNA plus Cisplatin
may enhance the sensitivity of chemotherapy in esophageal
cancer”. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 2012, 138, 1759.
[92] Lin T., Chao C., Saito S., Mazur S.J., Murphy M.E., Appella E., Xu
Y.: “p53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by
suppressing Nanog expression”. Nat. Cell. Biol., 2005, 7, 165.
[93] Zbinden M., Duquet A., Lorente-Trigos A., Ngwabyt S.N., Borges I.,
Ruiz i Altaba A.: “NANOG regulates glioma stem cells and is essential
in vivo acting in a cross-functional network with GLI1 and
p53”. EMBO J., 2010, 29, 2659
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Top