Article Data

  • Views 441
  • Dowloads 126

Original Research

Open Access

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis resectability in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

  • D. Rossetti1
  • S.G. Vitale2,*,
  • F.A. Gulino2
  • A.M.C. Rapisarda2
  • G. Valenti2
  • M. Zigarelli2
  • G. Sarpietro2
  • L. Frigerio1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Papa Giovanni XXIII" Hospital, Bergamo, Italy

2Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3234.2016 Vol.37,Issue 5,October 2016 pp.671-673

Published: 10 October 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): S.G. Vitale E-mail: vitalesalvatore@hotmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis resectability in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer (AOC). Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients affected by advanced stage ovarian cancer who underwent LESS for operative work-up. A standard cytoreductive laparotomy surgery (CRS) was performed. Results: Fifty-two women affected by AOC underwent LESS for operative work-up. The peritoneal cancer score was completed in 49 (94%) patients by use of LESS; 34/37 (92%) patients considered with a resectable disease were effectively optimally debulked and 15/52 (28%) patients considered with an unresectable disease received before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and then underwent surgery. Conclusion: LESS is feasible, safe, and is an alternative minimally invasive procedure to assess the resectability of AOC patients.

Keywords

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS); Single-port laparoscopy; Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; Peritoneal carcinomatosis; Residual tumor.

Cite and Share

D. Rossetti,S.G. Vitale,F.A. Gulino,A.M.C. Rapisarda,G. Valenti,M. Zigarelli,G. Sarpietro,L. Frigerio. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis resectability in patients with advanced ovarian cancer . European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(5);671-673.

References

[1] Griffiths C.T.: “Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma”. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr., 1975, 42, 101.

[2] Chi D.S., Liao J.B., Leon L.F., Venkatraman E.S., Hensley M.L., Bhaskaran D., Hoskins W.J.: “Identification of prognostic factors in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 82, 532.

[3] Chéreau E., Ballester M., Selle F., Cortez A., Daraï E., Rouzier R.: “Comparison of peritoneal carcinomatosis scoring methods in predicting resectability and prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 202, 178.e1.

[4] Nezhat F.R., DeNoble S.M., Liu C.S., Cho J.E., Brown D.N., Chuang L., et al.: “The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging and debulking of apparent advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers”. JSLS, 2010, 14, 155.

[5] Fader A.N., Escobar P.F.: “Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 114, 157.

[6] Fagotti A., Ferrandina G., Fanfani F., Ercoli A., Lorusso D., Rossi M., Scambia G.: “A laparoscopy-based score to predict surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a pilot study”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 13, 1156.

[7] Vergote I., De Wever I., Tjalma W., Gramberen M., Van Decloedt J., Van Dam P.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 285 patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 71, 431.

[8] Bradford L.S., Boruta D.M.: “Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: a review of the literature, tools, and techniques”. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv., 2013, 68, 295.

[9] Varnoux C., Huchon C., Bats A.S., Bensaid C., Achouri A., Nos C., Lécuru F.: “Diagnostic accuracy of hand-assisted laparoscopy in predicting resectability of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gynecological malignancies”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2013, 39, 774.

[10] Stoeckle E., Bourdarias L., Guyon F., Croce S., Brouste V., Thomas L., Floquet A.: “Progress in survival outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated by neo-adjuvant platinum/taxanebased chemotherapy and late interval debulking surgery”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2014, 21, 629.

[11] Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., Smigal C., Thun M.J..: “Cancer statistics, 2006”. CA Cancer J Clin., 2006, 56, 106.

[12] Benedet J.L., Bender H., Jones H. 3rd, Ngan H.Y., Pecorelli S.: “FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2000, 70, 209.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top