Article Data

  • Views 458
  • Dowloads 129

Original Research

Open Access

Does prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy during pelviscopic hysterectomy increase perioperative morbidity?

  • S. Schrot-Sanyan1,*,
  • A. Brandt1
  • K. Münstedt1
  • C. Akladios1

1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ortenauklinikum Offenburg, Offenburg, Germany

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3248.2016 Vol.37,Issue 6,December 2016 pp.771-774

Published: 10 December 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): S. Schrot-Sanyan E-mail: stephschrot@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To compare the safety of additional salpingectomies in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign indication. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in the Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg (Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). Classical laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed between 2010 and 2011 and a prophylactic salpingectomy was added thereafter. The authors analysed the postoperative complications until 2013 according to the Clavien-Dindo scale in performing a logistic regression model adjusted on potential confounders. They also analysed other surgery outcomes such as operative time, duration of the hospital stay, and the blood loss during the surgery. Results: Over 301 patients were retrieved from the records. Postoperative complication rates were not different between the two groups (13.8% versus 14.2 % patients, OR = 0.93 [0.47 – 1.84], p = 0.84). Other outcomes were also not different. Conclusion: Prophylactic salpingectomy performed during a laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions seems to be safe and recommended. Prospective studies especially with respect to the magnitude of the prophylactic effect are needed.

Keywords

Prophylactic salpingectomy; Ovarian cancer prevention.

Cite and Share

S. Schrot-Sanyan,A. Brandt,K. Münstedt,C. Akladios. Does prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy during pelviscopic hysterectomy increase perioperative morbidity?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(6);771-774.

References

[1] Buys S.S., Partridge E., Black A., Johnson C.C., Lamerato L., Isaacs C., et al.: “Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial”. JAMA, 2011, 305, 2295.

[2] U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: “Screening for Ovarian Cancer: Brief Evidence Update” (2004). Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/3rduspstf/ovariancan/ovcanup.htm

[3] Prescrire Rédaction: “Dépistage des cancers de l’ovaire: délétère”. Rev. Prescrire, 2012, 32, 129. [Article in French]

[4] Parker W.H., Shoupe D., Broder M.S., Liu Z., Farquhar C., Berek J.S.: “Elective oophorectomy in the gynecological patient: when is it desirable?” Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2007, 19, 350.

[5] Berek J.S., Chalas E., Edelson M., Moore D.H., Burke W.M., Cliby W.A., et al.: “Prophylactic and risk-reducing bilateral salpingooophorectomy: recommendations based on risk of ovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 116, 733.

[6] Piek J.M., van Diest P.J., Zweemer R.P., Jansen J.W., Poort-Keesom R.J., Menko F.H., et al.: “Dysplastic changes in prophylactically removed Fallopian tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer”. J. Pathol., 2001, 195, 451.

[7] Callahan M.J., Crum C.P., Medeiros F., Kindelberger D.W., Elvin J.A., Garber J.E., et al.: “Primary fallopian tube malignancies in BRCA-positive women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer risk reduction”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 25, 3985.

[8] Carlson J.W., Miron A., Jarboe E.A., Parast M.M., Hirsch M.S., Lee Y., et al.: “Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma: Its Potential Role in Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma and Serous Cancer Prevention”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2008, 26, 4160.

[9] Kindelberger D.W., Lee Y., Miron A., Hirsch M.S., Feltmate C., Medeiros F., et al.: “Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: Evidence for a causal relationship”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2007, 31, 161.

[10] Przybycin C.G., Kurman R.J., Ronnett B.M., Shih I.M., Vang R.: “Are all pelvic (nonuterine) serous carcinomas of tubal origin?” Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2010, 34, 1407.

[11] Reade C.J., Riva J.J., Busse J.W., Goldsmith C.H., Elit L.: “Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Gynecol Oncol., 2013, 130, 674.

[12] Staebler A.: “Vorläuferläsionen der Ovarialkarzinome”. Pathologe, 2011, 32, 265. [Article in German]

[13] Tone A.A., Salvador S., Finlayson S.J., Tinker A.V., Kwon J.S., Lee C.H., et al.: “The role of the fallopian tube in ovarian cancer”. Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol., 2012, 10, 296.

[14] Vang R., Shih I.M., Kurman R.J.: “Fallopian tube precursors of ovarian low- and high-grade serous neoplasms”. Histopathology, 2013, 62, 44.

[15] Kurman R.J., Shih I.M.: “Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer--shifting the paradigm”. Hum. Pathol., 2011, 42, 918.

[16] Kuhn E., Kurman R.J., Vang R., Sehdev A.S., Han G., Soslow R., et al.: “TP53 mutations in serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and concurrent pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma--evidence supporting the clonal relationship of the two lesions”. J. Pathol., 2012, 226, 421.

[17] Mehra K., Mehrad M., Ning G., Drapkin R., McKeon F.D., Xian W., et al.: “STICS, SCOUTs and p53 signatures; a new language for pelvic serous carcinogenesis”. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.), 2011, 3, 625.

[18] Salvador S., Gilks B., Köbel M., Huntsman D., Rosen B., Miller D.: “The fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2009, 19, 58.

[19] Chêne G., Penault-Llorca F., Raoelfils I., Bignon Y.J., Ray-Coquard I., Seffert P., et al.: “Ovarian carcinogenesis: recent and past hypotheses”. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil., 2011, 39, 216. [Article in French]

[20] Crum C.P., Drapkin R., Miron A., Ince T.A., Muto M., Kindelberger D.W., et al.: “The distal fallopian tube: a new model for pelvic serous carcinogenesis”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2007, 19, 3.

[21] Reade C.J., McVey R.M., Tone A.A., Finlayson S.J., McAlpine J.N., Fung-Kee-Fung M., et al.: “The fallopian tube as the origin of high grade serous ovarian cancer: review of a paradigm shift”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can., 2014, 36, 133.

[22] Greene M.H., Mai P.L., Schwartz P.E.: “Does bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian retention warrant consideration as a temporary bridge to risk-reducing bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers?” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2011, 204, 19.e1.

[23] Kamran M.W., Vaughan D., Crosby D., Wahab N.A., Saadeh F.A., Gleeson N.: “Opportunistic and interventional salpingectomy in women at risk: a strategy for preventing pelvic serous cancer (PSC)”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2013, 170, 251.

[24] Gilks C.B., Miller D.: “Opportunistic salpingectomy for women at low risk for development of ovarian carcinoma: the time has come”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 129, 443.

[25] Foulkes W.D.: “Preventing ovarian cancer by salpingectomy”. Curr. Oncol., 2013, 20, 139.

[26] Dwyer P.L.: “Ovarian cancer and the pelvic floor surgeon: the case for prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy during POP surgery”. Int. Urogynecol. J., 2012, 23, 655.

[27] Westgren M.: “Prevention of ovarian cancer--let’s do something”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2012, 91, 1009.

[28] Anderson C.K., Wallace S., Guiahi M., Sheeder J., Behbakht K., Spillman M.A.: “Risk-reducing salpingectomy as preventative strategy for pelvic serous cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 417.

[29] Narod S.A.: “Salpingectomy to prevent ovarian cancer”. Curr. Oncol., 2013, 20, 145.

[30] Dietl J., Wischhusen J.: “The forgotten fallopian tube”. Nat. Rev.Cancer, 2011, 11, 227.

[31] Jaton C., Meyer-Hamme U., Petignat P., Kayser B., Irion O., Boulvain M.: “What’s new in gynecology and obstetrics”. Rev. Med. Suisse, 2012, 8, 92. [Article in French]

[32] Dietl J., Wischhusen J., Häusler S.F.M.: “The post-reproductive Fallopian tube: better removed?” Hum. Reprod., 2011, 26, 2918.

[33] Gill S.E., Mills B.B.: “Physician opinions regarding elective bilateral salpingectomy with hysterectomy and for sterilization”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2013, 20, 517.

[34] Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A.: “Classification of Surgical Complications”. Ann. Surg., 2004, 240, 205.

[35] R Development Core Team: “R: A language and environment for statistical computing”. Available at: http://www.R-project.org

[36] Minig L., Chuang L., Patrono M.G., Cárdenas-Rebollo J.M., García- Donas J.: “Surgical outcomes and complications of prophylactic salpingectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy in premenopausal women”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2015, 22, 653.

[37] Morelli M., Venturella R., Mocciaro R., Di Cello A., Rania E., LicoD., et al.: “Prophylactic salpingectomy in premenopaus al low-risk women for ovarian cancer: primum non nocere”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 129, 448.

[38] McAlpine J.N., Hanley G.E., Woo M.M.M., Tone A.A., Rozenberg N., Swenerton K.D., et al.: “Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 210, 471.e1.

[39] Vorwergk J., Radosa M.P., Nicolaus K., Baus N., Jimenez Cruz J., Rengsberger M., et al.: “Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy (PBS) to reduce ovarian cancer risk incorporated in standard premenopausal hysterectomy: complications and re-operation rate”. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 140, 859.

[40] Ghezzi F., Cromi A., Siesto G., Bergamini V., Zefiro F., Bolis P.: “Infectious morbidity after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: does concomitant salpingectomy make a difference?” BJOG, 2009, 116, 589.

[41] Berlit S., Tuschy B., Kehl S., Brade J., Sütterlin M., Hornemann A.: “Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with concomitant bilateral salpingectomy--why not?” Anticancer Res., 2013, 33, 2771.

[42] Findley A.D., Siedhoff M.T., Hobbs K.A., Steege J.F., Carey E.T., McCall C.A., et al.: “Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial”. Fertil. Steril., 2013, 100, 1704

[43] Sezik M., Ozkaya O., Demir F., Sezik H.T., Kaya H.: “Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2007, 33, 863.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top