Article Data

  • Views 444
  • Dowloads 137

Original Research

Open Access

Metastatic mammary carcinoma despite histologically negative sentinel lymph nodes: are there any indicators for estimating recurrence and metastasis rates?

  • M. Weiss1,*,
  • S. Siegert2
  • P. Bartenstein1
  • A. Rominger1

1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany

2Institute for Pathology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3261.2016 Vol.37,Issue 6,December 2016 pp.820-826

Published: 10 December 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Weiss E-mail: mayo.weiss@med.uni-muenchen.de

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify indicators for an increased frequency of recurrent or metastatic disease in women with mammary carcinoma staged negative for nodal involvement. Materials and Methods: 202/270 patients (age: mean 57.5, range 24-83 years) with histologically confirmed early stage mammary carcinoma negative for metastasis to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were observed with respect to their clinical course for a mean period of 3.6 years following SLN extirpation. Results: Forty of 202 patients with negative SLN underwent chemotherapy (38/188 in the recurrence-free group vs. 2/14 in the group with progressive disease) and 79% of both subcollectives did not undergo chemotherapy. Seven of 188 of patients in the recurrence-free group received immunotherapy and none of the patients in the group with disease progression were treated with this modality. One hundred sixty-two of 202 patients with negative SLN underwent hormone therapy, 157/188 in the recurrence-free group and 5/14 in the group with disease progression. One hundred sixty-four of 202 patients with negative nodal status received adjuvant radiation therapy of the affected breast, 156/188 in the recurrence-free group and 8/14 in the group with disease progression. Conclusions: When assessing the risk profile for disease recurrence or the occurrence of metastatic disease, statistically significant differences with respect to disease progression were identified for the parameters chemo-, antibody, hormone, and radiation therapy. The preliminary observations of this study show that even those patients in an early disease stage and with negative SLNs profit from these adjuvant non-surgical therapy options.

Keywords

Breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Recurrence and metastasis rates; Adjuvant therapy.

Cite and Share

M. Weiss,S. Siegert,P. Bartenstein,A. Rominger. Metastatic mammary carcinoma despite histologically negative sentinel lymph nodes: are there any indicators for estimating recurrence and metastasis rates?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(6);820-826.

References

[1] Giammarile F., Alazraki N., Aarsvold J.N., Audisio R.A., Glass E., Grant S.F., et al.: “The EANM and SNMMI practice guideline for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer”. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 2013, 40, 1932.

[2] Buscombe J., Paganelli G., Burak Z.E., Waddington W., Maublant J., Prats E., et al.: “European Association of Nuclear Medicine Oncology Committee and Dosimetry Committee. Sentinel node in breast cancer procedural guidelines”. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 2007, 34, 2154.

[3] Weiss M., Gildehaus F.J., Brinkbäumer K., Makowski M., Hahn K.: “Lymph kinetics with technetium-99m labeled radiopharmaceuticals- Animal studies”. Nuklearmedizin, 2005, 44, 156.

[4] Weiss M., Meyer M., Siegert S., Bartenstein P., Pfluger T.: “Metastases in patients with breast cancer despite of negative sentinel lymph node. Has the concept to be changed?” Nuklearmedizin, 2013, 52, 14.

[5] Schwartz G.F., Bartelink H., Burstein H.J.: “Adjuvant therapy in stage I carcinoma of the breast: the influence of multigene analyses and molecular phenotyping”. Breast J., 2012, 18, 303.

[6] Ahmed S.S., Thike A.A., Iqbal J., Yong W.S., Tan B., Madhukumar P., et al.: “Sentinel lymph nodes with isolated tumour cells and micrometastases in breast cancer: clinical relevance and prognostic significance”. J. Clin. Pathol., 2014, 67, 243.

[7] Berclaz B., Li S., Price K.N., Coates A.S., Castiglione-Gertsch M., Rudenstamm C.M, et al.: “Body mass index as a prognostic feature in operable breast cancer: the international breast cancer study group experience”. Ann. Oncol., 2004, 15, 875.

[8] Cserni G.: “The effect of sentinel lymph node biopsy on the Nottingham Prognostic Index in breast cancer patients”. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb., 2001, 46, 208.

[9] Dian D., Straub J., Scholz C., Mylonas I., Rack B., Sommer H., et al.: “Influencing factors for regional lymph node recurrence of breast cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2008, 277, 127.

[10] Kwast A.B., Groothuis-Oudshoorn K.C., Grandjean I., Ho V.K., Voogd A.C., Menke-Pluymers M.B., et al.: “Histological type is not an independent prognostic factor for the risk pattern of breast cancer recurrences”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2012, 135, 271.

[11] Wely van B.J., Smidt M.L., de Kievit I.M., Wauters C.A., Strobbe L.J.: “False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy”. Br. J. Surg., 2008, 95, 1352.

[12] Dabakuyo T.S., Bonnetain F., Roignot P., Poillot M.L.: “Populationbased study of breast cancer survival in Cote d'Or: prognostic factors and relative survival”. Ann. Oncol., 2008, 19, 276.

[13] Collan Y., Eskelinen M.J., Nordling S.A.: “Prognostic studies in breast cancer. Multivariate combination of nodal status, proliferation index, tumor size and DANN ploidity”. Acta Oncol., 1994, 33, 873.

[14] Madsen E.V., Elias S.G., van Dalen T., van Oort P.M., van Gorp J., Gobardhan P.D., Bongers V.: “Predictive factors of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer”. Breast, 2013, 22, 748.

[15] Goldhirsch A., Wood W.C., Gelber R.D.: “Progress and promise: highlight of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer”. Ann. Oncol., 2007, 28, 1133.

[16] Osborne C.K., Yochmowitz M.G.: “The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer”. Cancer, 1980, 46, 2884.

[17] Wang Y., Yao L., Liu Y.Q., Xu Y., Ou Y.T., Li J.F., Wang T.F.: “Different influence of Her-2 expression on the prognosis in node-positive and node-negative breast cancer”. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 2010, 32, 511.

[18] Hackney L., Williams S., Bajwa S., Morley-Davies A.J., Kirby R.M., Britton I.: “Influence of tumor histology on preoperative staging accuracy of breast metastases to the axilla”. Breast J., 2013, 19, 49.

[19] Jimbo K., Kinoshita T., Suzuki J., Asaga S., Hojo T., Yoshida M., Tsuda H.: “Sentinel and nonsentinel lymph node assessment using a combination of one-step nucleic acid amplification and conventional histological examination”. Breast, 2013, 22, 1194.

[20] Gloyeske N.C., Goreal W., O'Neil M., Connor C., Tawfik O.W., Fan F.: “Outcomes of breast cancer patients with micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes”. In Vivo, 2011, 25, 997.

[21] Gobhardhan P.D., Elias S.G., Madsen E.V., Bongers V., Ruitenberg H.J.M., Perre C.I., van Dalen T.: “Prognostic value of micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: a cohort study”. Ann. Oncol., 2009, 20, 41.

[22] Kim H.J., Son B.H., Park E.W., Lim W.S., Seo J.Y., Jang M.A., Ku B.K.: “Axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2009, 114, 301.

[23] Nagashima T., Sakakibara M., Nakano S., Tanabe N., Nakamura R., Nakatani Y., et al.: “Sentinel node micrometastasis and distant failure in breast cancer patients”. Breast Cancer, 2006, 13, 186.

[24] Cheng G., Kurita S., Torigian D.A., Alavi A.: “Current status of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer”. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 2011, 38, 562.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top