Article Data

  • Views 1888
  • Dowloads 141

Original Research

Open Access

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in assessment of surgical margin of cervical cancer after loop electrosurgical excision procedure

  • H.J. Qian1,2
  • T.G. Yu1,*,
  • G.F. Zhang2
  • Y. Yu3
  • D.Y. Geng1
  • E. Harris4
  • Y.M. Feng4

1Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai

2Department of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai

3Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin (China)

4Department of Radiation Oncology, East Carolina University, Grenville, NC (USA)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3394.2017 Vol.38,Issue 4,August 2017 pp.555-559

Published: 10 August 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): T.G. Yu E-mail: ytg630@163.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To investigate the value of magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and its derived parameter of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), in evaluating surgical margin for cervical cancer after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Materials and Methods: The authors included 50 cervical cancer patients as the LEEP group and 70 patients with no cervical lesions as the control group. All patients underwent routine pelvic MR and DWI examinations. The LEEP group was separated into two subgroups according to histopathological study results, i.e., negative surgical margin group and positive surgical margin group. The ADC values were calculated and compared between different groups. ROC curve was employed to investigate the discriminatory capability of the ADC values. Results: The mean ADC values in the control group, the negative surgical margin, and the positive surgical margin group were 1.393 ± 0.199×10-3 mm2 /S, 1.259 ± 0.157×10-3 mm2 /S, and 0.961 ± 0.179×10-3 mm2 /S, respectively. Significant difference was observed between any two of the three groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The application of DWI with ADC value analysis considerably improved the differentiation of normal cervix tissue from post-treatment inflammation reaction and residual tumor in cervical cancer patients after LEEP therapy.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; DWI; ADC; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Cite and Share

H.J. Qian,T.G. Yu,G.F. Zhang,Y. Yu,D.Y. Geng,E. Harris,Y.M. Feng. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in assessment of surgical margin of cervical cancer after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(4);555-559.

References

[1] Wright J.D., Chen L., Tergas A.I., Burke W.M., Hou J.Y., Neugut A.I., et al.: “Population-level trends in relative survival for cervical cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2015, 213, 670.e1.

[2] Egawa N., Egawa K., Griffin H., Doorbar J.: “Human papillomaviruses, epithelial tropisms, and the development of neoplasia”. Viruses, 2015, 7, 3863.

[3] Khan M.J., Smith-McCune K.K.: “Treatment of cervical precancers: back to basics”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 123, 1339.

[4] Patel D.A., Saraiya M., Copeland G., Cote M.L., Datta S.D., Sawaya G.F.: “Treatment patterns for cervical carcinoma in situ in Michigan, 1998–2003”. J. Registry Manag., 2013, 40, 84.

[5] Somoye G., Harry V., Semple S., Plataniotis G., Scott N., Gilbert F.J., et al.: “Early diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging can predict survival in women with locally advanced cancer of the cervix treated with combined chemoradiation”. Eur. Radiol., 2012, 22, 2319.

[6] Makino H., Kato H., Furui T., Morishige K.I., Kanematsu M.: “Predictive value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2013, 40, 1098.

[7] Nakamura K., Kajitani S., Joja I., Haruma T., Fukushima C., Kusumoto T., et al.: “The posttreatment mean apparent diffusion coefficient of primary tumor is superior to pretreatment ADC mean of primary tumor as a predictor of prognosis with cervical cancer”. Cancer Med., 2013, 2, 519.

[8] Testa M.L., Chojniak R., Sene L.S., Damascena A.S., Guimaraes M.D., Szklaruk J., et al.: “Is DWI/ADC a useful tool in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions suspected of malignancy?”. PLoS One, 2014, 9, e101944.

[9] Fu Z.Z., Peng Y., Cao L.Y., Chen Y.S., Li K., Fu B.H.: “Value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessing radiotherapy and chemotherapy success in cervical cancer”. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2015, 33, 516.

[10] Guldeniz AD, Turkan G, Murat BC.: “Is the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Necessary for Minor Cervical Cytological Abnormalities?”. Asian Pac. J Cancer Prev., 2014, 15, 305.

[11] Munro A., Leung Y., Spilsbury K., Stewart C.J.R., Semmens J., Codde J., et al.: “Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 137, 258.

[12] Latif N.A., Neubauer N.L., Helenowski I.B., Lurain J.R.: “Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization”. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis., 2014, 19, 97.

[13] Kuang F., Ren J., Zhong Q., Liyuan F., Huan Y., Chen Z.: “The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer”. Eur. Radiol., 2013, 23, 1050.

[14] Schieda N., Malone S.C., Dandan O.A., Ramchandani P., Siegelman E.S.: “Multi-modality organ-based approach to expected imaging findings, complications and recurrent tumour in the genitourinary tract after radiotherapy”. Insights Imaging, 2014, 5, 25.

[15] Lucas R., Dias J.L., Cunha T.M.: “Added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of cervical cancer recurrence: comparison with morphologic and dynamiccontrast-enhanced MRI sequences”. Diagn. Interv. Radiol., 2015, 21, 368.

[16] Liu Y., Ye Z., Sun H., Bai R.: “Grading of uterine cervical cancer by using the ADC difference value and its correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor”. Eur. Radiol., 2013, 23, 757.

[17] Charles-Edwards E., Morgan V., Attygalle A.D., Giles S.L., Ind T.E., Davis M., et al.: “Endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging of stage 1A/1B cervical cancer with A T2 and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance technique: effect of lesion size and previous cone biopsy on tumor detectability”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 120, 368.

[18] Schreuder S.M., Lensing R., Stoker J., Bipat S.: “Monitoring treatment response in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer by additional diffusion-weighted imaging: a systematic review.”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2014, 42, 572

[19] Bammer R.: “Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2003, 45, 69

[20] Hoogendam J.P., Klerkx W.M., de Kort G.A., Bipat S., Zweemer R.P., Sie-Go D.M., et al.: “The influence of the b-value combination on apparent diffusion coefficient based differentiation between malignant and benign tissue in cervical cancer”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2010, 32, 376.

[21] Padhani A.R., Liu G., Mu-Koh D., Chenevert T.L., Thoeny H.C., Takahara T., et al.: “Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations”. Neoplasia, 2009, 11, 102.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top