Article Data

  • Views 642
  • Dowloads 140

Original Research

Open Access

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in assessment of surgical margin of cervical cancer after loop electrosurgical excision procedure

  • H.J. Qian1,2
  • T.G. Yu1,*,
  • G.F. Zhang2
  • Y. Yu3
  • D.Y. Geng1
  • E. Harris4
  • Y.M. Feng4

1Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai

2Department of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai

3Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin (China)

4Department of Radiation Oncology, East Carolina University, Grenville, NC (USA)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3394.2017 Vol.38,Issue 4,August 2017 pp.555-559

Published: 10 August 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): T.G. Yu E-mail: ytg630@163.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To investigate the value of magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and its derived parameter of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), in evaluating surgical margin for cervical cancer after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Materials and Methods: The authors included 50 cervical cancer patients as the LEEP group and 70 patients with no cervical lesions as the control group. All patients underwent routine pelvic MR and DWI examinations. The LEEP group was separated into two subgroups according to histopathological study results, i.e., negative surgical margin group and positive surgical margin group. The ADC values were calculated and compared between different groups. ROC curve was employed to investigate the discriminatory capability of the ADC values. Results: The mean ADC values in the control group, the negative surgical margin, and the positive surgical margin group were 1.393 ± 0.199×10-3 mm2 /S, 1.259 ± 0.157×10-3 mm2 /S, and 0.961 ± 0.179×10-3 mm2 /S, respectively. Significant difference was observed between any two of the three groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The application of DWI with ADC value analysis considerably improved the differentiation of normal cervix tissue from post-treatment inflammation reaction and residual tumor in cervical cancer patients after LEEP therapy.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; DWI; ADC; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Cite and Share

H.J. Qian,T.G. Yu,G.F. Zhang,Y. Yu,D.Y. Geng,E. Harris,Y.M. Feng. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in assessment of surgical margin of cervical cancer after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(4);555-559.

References

[1] Wright J.D., Chen L., Tergas A.I., Burke W.M., Hou J.Y., Neugut A.I., et al.: “Population-level trends in relative survival for cervical cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2015, 213, 670.e1.

[2] Egawa N., Egawa K., Griffin H., Doorbar J.: “Human papillomaviruses, epithelial tropisms, and the development of neoplasia”. Viruses, 2015, 7, 3863.

[3] Khan M.J., Smith-McCune K.K.: “Treatment of cervical precancers: back to basics”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 123, 1339.

[4] Patel D.A., Saraiya M., Copeland G., Cote M.L., Datta S.D., Sawaya G.F.: “Treatment patterns for cervical carcinoma in situ in Michigan, 1998–2003”. J. Registry Manag., 2013, 40, 84.

[5] Somoye G., Harry V., Semple S., Plataniotis G., Scott N., Gilbert F.J., et al.: “Early diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging can predict survival in women with locally advanced cancer of the cervix treated with combined chemoradiation”. Eur. Radiol., 2012, 22, 2319.

[6] Makino H., Kato H., Furui T., Morishige K.I., Kanematsu M.: “Predictive value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2013, 40, 1098.

[7] Nakamura K., Kajitani S., Joja I., Haruma T., Fukushima C., Kusumoto T., et al.: “The posttreatment mean apparent diffusion coefficient of primary tumor is superior to pretreatment ADC mean of primary tumor as a predictor of prognosis with cervical cancer”. Cancer Med., 2013, 2, 519.

[8] Testa M.L., Chojniak R., Sene L.S., Damascena A.S., Guimaraes M.D., Szklaruk J., et al.: “Is DWI/ADC a useful tool in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions suspected of malignancy?”. PLoS One, 2014, 9, e101944.

[9] Fu Z.Z., Peng Y., Cao L.Y., Chen Y.S., Li K., Fu B.H.: “Value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessing radiotherapy and chemotherapy success in cervical cancer”. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2015, 33, 516.

[10] Guldeniz AD, Turkan G, Murat BC.: “Is the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Necessary for Minor Cervical Cytological Abnormalities?”. Asian Pac. J Cancer Prev., 2014, 15, 305.

[11] Munro A., Leung Y., Spilsbury K., Stewart C.J.R., Semmens J., Codde J., et al.: “Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 137, 258.

[12] Latif N.A., Neubauer N.L., Helenowski I.B., Lurain J.R.: “Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization”. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis., 2014, 19, 97.

[13] Kuang F., Ren J., Zhong Q., Liyuan F., Huan Y., Chen Z.: “The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer”. Eur. Radiol., 2013, 23, 1050.

[14] Schieda N., Malone S.C., Dandan O.A., Ramchandani P., Siegelman E.S.: “Multi-modality organ-based approach to expected imaging findings, complications and recurrent tumour in the genitourinary tract after radiotherapy”. Insights Imaging, 2014, 5, 25.

[15] Lucas R., Dias J.L., Cunha T.M.: “Added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of cervical cancer recurrence: comparison with morphologic and dynamiccontrast-enhanced MRI sequences”. Diagn. Interv. Radiol., 2015, 21, 368.

[16] Liu Y., Ye Z., Sun H., Bai R.: “Grading of uterine cervical cancer by using the ADC difference value and its correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor”. Eur. Radiol., 2013, 23, 757.

[17] Charles-Edwards E., Morgan V., Attygalle A.D., Giles S.L., Ind T.E., Davis M., et al.: “Endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging of stage 1A/1B cervical cancer with A T2 and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance technique: effect of lesion size and previous cone biopsy on tumor detectability”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 120, 368.

[18] Schreuder S.M., Lensing R., Stoker J., Bipat S.: “Monitoring treatment response in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer by additional diffusion-weighted imaging: a systematic review.”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2014, 42, 572

[19] Bammer R.: “Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2003, 45, 69

[20] Hoogendam J.P., Klerkx W.M., de Kort G.A., Bipat S., Zweemer R.P., Sie-Go D.M., et al.: “The influence of the b-value combination on apparent diffusion coefficient based differentiation between malignant and benign tissue in cervical cancer”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2010, 32, 376.

[21] Padhani A.R., Liu G., Mu-Koh D., Chenevert T.L., Thoeny H.C., Takahara T., et al.: “Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations”. Neoplasia, 2009, 11, 102.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top