Article Data

  • Views 522
  • Dowloads 103

Original Research

Open Access

Microarray gene expression profiling for identifying different responses to radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer

  • K. Chen1,2
  • J.J. Ge3
  • S.X. Yan1,*,
  • S.B. Ke1

1Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

2Department of Radiochemotherapy, Yinzhou Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningb, China

3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yinzhou Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3401.2017 Vol.38,Issue 1,February 2017 pp.106-112

Published: 10 February 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): S.X. Yan E-mail: senyanx@163.com

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical cancer, which is treated by radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), has high morbidity and mortality in women. This study aimed to identify differences in gene response to CRT and RT. Materials and Methods: GSE3578 was downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus including specimens from 20 RT-treated patients and 19 CRT-treated patients. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using siggenes package in R. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was visualized by cytoscape. MCODE and cytoscape was used separately to mine and construct modules in the PPI network. Transcription factor (TF)-DEG and miRNA-DEG pairs were predicted and then visualized by cytoscape. Results: Total 22 upregulated and 181 downregulated genes were identified in CRT samples. Several functions were enriched for these DEGs. A module involving ZNF449 and ZNF673 was mined from the PPI network of downregulated genes. In the TF-DEG regulatory networks, downregulated GATA3 (which was modulated by SP1) was also a TF, as well as upregulated CDK6 was regulated by several TFs (e.g. GATA3). Hsa-miR-17, hsa-miR-34a, hsa-miR-124, hsamiR-1185-2-3p, hsa-1185-1-3p, and hsa-let-7f-2-3p were identified as key miRNAs in the miRNA-DEG regulatory network. Conclusion: CRT might cure cervical cancer by acting on those molecules that were more sensitive to CRT than CT.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Radiotherapy; Chemoradiotherapy; Protein-protein interaction network; Regulatory network.

Cite and Share

K. Chen,J.J. Ge,S.X. Yan,S.B. Ke. Microarray gene expression profiling for identifying different responses to radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(1);106-112.

References

[1] Bray F., Jemal A., Grey N., Ferlay J., Forman D.: “Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008– 2030): a population-based study”. Lancet Oncol., 2012, 13, 790.

[2] World Health Organization: “World cancer report, 2014”. Geneva: WHO Report 2014.

[3] Bygbjerg I.: “Double burden of noncommunicable and infectious diseases in developing countries”. Science, 2012, 337, 1499.

[4] Touboul C., Skalli D., Guillo E., Martin M., Mallaurie E., Mansouri D., et al.: “Treatment of cervical cancer”. Rev. Prat., 2014, 64, 802.

[5] Colombo N., Carinelli S., Colombo A., Marini C., Rollo D., Sessa C., ESMO Guidelines Working Group.: “Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann. Oncol., 2012, 23, vii27.

[6] Wei L.C., Wang N., Shi M., Liu J.Y., Li J.P., Zhang Y., et al.: “Clinical outcome observation of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/ radiotherapy alone in 174 Chinese patients with local advanced cervical carcinoma”. Onco. Targets Ther., 2013, 6, 67.

[7] Gondi V., Bentzen S.M., Sklenar K.L., Dunn E.F., Petereit D.G., Tannehill S.P., et al.: “Severe late toxicities following concomitant chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone in cervical cancer: an inter-era analysis”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2012, 84, 973.

[8] Yoshida K., Sasaki R., Nishimura H., Miyawaki D., Kawabe T., Okamoto Y., et al.: “Radiotherapy for Japanese elderly patients with cervical cancer: preliminary survival outcomes and evaluation of treatment-related toxicity. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2011, 284, 1007.

[9] Tewari K.S., Monk B.J.: “The rationale for the use of non-platinum chemotherapy doublets for metastatic and recurrent cervical carcinoma”. Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol., 2010, 8, 108.

[10] Obstetricians A.C.o., Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin: “Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Number 35, May 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists”. Int. J Gynaecol. Obstet., 2002, 78, 79.

[11] Eifel P.J.: “Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer”. Semin. Radiat. Oncol., 2006, 16, 177.

[12] Tan L., Zahra M.: “Long-term survival and late toxicity after chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer—the Addenbrooke's experience”. Clin. Oncol., 2008, 20, 358.

[13] Vale C., Tierney J., Davidson S., Drinkwater K., Symonds P.: “Substantial improvement in UK cervical cancer survival with chemora-Oncol., 2010, 22, 590.

[14] Iwakawa M., Ohno T., Imadome K., Nakawatari M., Ishikawa K., Sakai M., et al.: “The radiation-induced cell-death signaling pathway is activated by concurrent use of cisplatin in sequential biopsy specimens from patients with cervical cancer”. Cancer Biol. Ther., 2007, 6, 905.

[15] Barrett T., Troup D.B., Wilhite S.E., Ledoux P., Rudnev D., Evangelista C., et al.: “NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles--database and tools update”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35, D760.

[16] Edgar R., Domrachev M., Lash A.E.: “Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2002, 30, 207.

[17] Bolstad B.: “preprocessCore: a collection of pre-processing functions”. R package, version 2013, 1.

[18] Schwender H.: “siggenes: multiple testing using SAM and Efron's empirical Bayes approaches”. R package, version 2009, 1.

[19] Hulsegge I., Kommadath A., Smits M.A.: “Globaltest and GOEAST: two different approaches for Gene Ontology analysis”. BMC Proc., 2009, 3, S10.

[20] Kanehisa M., Goto S.: “KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2000, 28, 27.

[21] Dennis G. Jr., Sherman B.T., Hosack D.A., Yang J., Gao W., Lane H.C., et al.: “DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery”. Genome Biol., 2003, 4, P3.

[22] Franceschini A., Szklarczyk D., Frankild S., Kuhn M., Simonovic M., Roth A., et al.: “STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D808-15.

[23] Kohl M., Wiese S., Warscheid B. Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks”. Methods Mol. Biol., 2011, 696, 291.

[24] Bader G.D., Hogue C.W.: “An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks”. BMC Bioinformatics, 2003, 4, 2.

[25] Karolchik D., Hinrichs A.S., Furey T.S., Roskin K.M., Sugnet C.W., Haussler D., et al.: “The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32, D493.

[26] Papadopoulos G.L., Reczko M., Simossis V.A., Sethupathy P., Hatzigeorgiou A.G.: “The database of experimentally supported targets: a functional update of TarBase”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37, D155.

[27] Garcia D.M., Baek D., Shin C., Bell G.W., Grimson A., Bartel D.P.: “Weak seed-pairing stability and high target-site abundance decrease the proficiency of lsy-6 and other microRNAs”. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 2011, 18, 1139.

[28] Xiao F., Zuo Z., Cai G., Kang S., Gao X., Li T.: “miRecords: an integrated resource for microRNA-target interactions”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37, D105.

[29] Wang W., Guo M., Hu L., Cai J., Zeng Y., Luo J., et al.: “The zinc finger protein ZNF268 is overexpressed in human cervical cancer and contributes to tumorigenesis via enhancing NF-κB signaling”. J. Biol. Chem., 2012, 287, 42856.

[30] Huang R.L., Chang C.C., Su P.H., Chen Y.C., Liao Y.P., Wang H.C., et al.: “Methylomic analysis identifies frequent DNA methylation of zinc finger protein 582 (ZNF582) in cervical neoplasms”. PLoS One, 2012, 7, e41060.

[31] Keshari R.P., Wang W., Zhang Y., Wang D.D., Li Y.F., Yuan S.Q., et al.: “Decreased expression of the GATA3 gene is associated with poor prognosis in primary gastric adenocarcinoma”. PLoS One, 2014, 9, e87195.

[32] Chang A., Amin A., Gabrielson E., Illei P., Roden R.B., Sharma R., et al.: “Utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry in differentiating urothelial carcinoma from prostate adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix, anus, and lung”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2012, 36, 1472.

[33] Zhao L., Antic T., Witten D., Paner G.P., Taxy J.B., Husain A., et al.: “Is GATA3 expression maintained in regional metastases?: a study of paired primary and metastatic urothelial carcinomas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2013, 37, 1876.

[34] Liang W.S., Aldrich J., Nasser S., Kurdoglu A., Phillips L., Reiman R., et al.: “Simultaneous characterization of somatic events and HPV-18 integration in a metastatic cervical carcinoma patient using DNA and RNA sequencing”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 329.

[35] Wang F., Li Y., Zhou J., Xu J., Peng C., Ye F., et al.: “miR-375 is downregulated in squamous cervical cancer and inhibits cell migration and invasion via targeting transcription factor SP1. Am. J. Pathol., 2011, 179, 2580.

[36] Dell G., Gaston K.: “Human papillomaviruses and their role in cervical cancer”. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 2001, 58, 1923.

[37] Rundlöf A.K., Carlsten M., Arnér E.S.: “The core promoter of human thioredoxin reductase 1: cloning, transcriptional activity, and Oct-1, Sp1, and Sp3 binding reveal a housekeeping-type promoter for the AUrich element-regulated gene”. J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276, 30542.

[38] Grande L., Bretones G., Rosa-Garrido M., Garrido-Martin E.M., Hernandez T., Fraile S., et al.: “Transcription factors Sp1 and p73 control the expression of the proapoptotic protein NOXA in the response of testicular embryonal carcinoma cells to cisplatin”. J. Biol. Chem., 2012, 287, 26495.

[39] Kohrt D., Crary J., Zimmer M., Patrick A.N., Ford H.L., Hinds P.W., et al.: “CDK6 binds and promotes the degradation of the EYA2 protein”. Cell Cycle, 2014, 13, 62.

[40] Wilting S.M., van Boerdonk R.A., Henken F.E., Meijer C., Diosdado B., Meijer G.A., et al.: “Methylation-mediated silencing and tumour suppressive function of hsa-miR-124 in cervical cancer”. Mol. Cancer, 2010, 9, 167.

[41] Li B., Hu Y., Ye F., Li Y., Lv W., Xie X.: “Reduced miR-34a expression in normal cervical tissues and cervical lesions with high-risk human papillomavirus infection”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2010, 20, 597.

[42] Xiao S., Liao S., Zhou Y., Jiang B., Li Y., Xue M.: “High expression of octamer transcription factor 1 in cervical cancer”. Oncol. Lett., 2014, 7, 1889.

[43] Tsuchida A., Ohno S., Wu W., Borjigin N., Fujita K., Aoki T., et al.: “miR-92 is a key oncogenic component of the miR-17–92 cluster in colon cancer”. Cancer Sci., 2011, 102, 2264.

[44] Kang H.W., Wang F., Wei Q., Zhao Y.F., Liu M., Li X., et al.: “miR-20a promotes migration and invasion by regulating TNKS2 in human cervical cancer cells”. FEBS Lett., 2012, 586, 897.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top