Article Data

  • Views 1438
  • Dowloads 123

Original Research

Open Access

UGT1A1 genotype-specific phase I and pharmacokinetic study for combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin: a Saitama tumor board study

  • M. Takano1,*,
  • T. Goto1
  • J. Hirata1
  • K. Furuya1
  • K. Horie2
  • M. Takahashi2
  • H. Yokota2
  • N. Kino2
  • K. Kudoh3
  • Y. Kikuchi4

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa

2Department of Gynecology, Saitama Cancer Center, Adachi-gun

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nishisaitama Chuo National Hospital, Tokorozawa

4Department of Gynecology, Ohki Memorial Kikuchi Cancer Clinic for Women, Tokorozawa, (Japan)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo340202 Vol.34,Issue 2,March 2013 pp.120-123

Published: 24 March 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Takano E-mail: mastkn@ndmc.ac.jp

Abstract

Introduction: Genotyping of UGT1A1 could be useful for prediction of severe toxicities for patients treated with irinotecan; however, genotype-based recommended dose (RD) has not been established. The aim of the present study was to determine the RD of irinotecan in combination with cisplatin (CPT-P) for individuals with or without UGT1A1 polymorphisms. Materials and Methods: According to polymorphisms of UGT1A1*28, *6, and *27, RDs were determined by three-case cohort methods for patients with wild-type and heterotype, and by inter-patient dose escalation for homotype patients. Pharmacokinetic studies were also evaluated. During May 2009 and July 2011, 18 Japanese patients were enrolled; 16 patients with ovarian carcinoma, and two cases with cervical cancer. The RD of irinotecan was determined as 50 mg/m2 for the patients with wild-type, 40 mg/m2 for those with heterotype, and 30 mg/m2 for homotype UGT1A1 genotype. Results: Patients with homotype UGT1A1 alleles had a significantly lower glucuronidation ratio in comparison with UGT1A1 wild-type and heterotype cases. Conclusion: UGT1A1 genotype-based RDs of irinotecan in CPT-P therapy were determined. Further studies to investigate efficacy of the RD including response evaluation are needed to confirm the present results.

Keywords

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1); UGT1A1*6; UGT1A1*28; Irinotecan; Cisplatin; Phase I.

Cite and Share

M. Takano,T. Goto,J. Hirata,K. Furuya,K. Horie,M. Takahashi,H. Yokota,N. Kino,K. Kudoh, Y. Kikuchi. UGT1A1 genotype-specific phase I and pharmacokinetic study for combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin: a Saitama tumor board study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2013. 34(2);120-123.

References

[1] Sugiyama T., Yakushiji M., Nishida T., Ushijima K, Okura N., Kigawa J., et al.: “Irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with cisplatin in patients with refractory or recurrent ovarian cancer”. Cancer Lett., 1998, 128, 211.

[2] Sugiyama T., Yakushiji M., Noda K., Ikeda M., Kudoh R., Yajima A., et al.: “Phase II study of irinotecan and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer”. Oncology 2000, 58, 31.

[3] Adachi S., Ogasawara T., Yamasaki N., Shibahara H., Kanazawa R., Tsuji Y., et al.: “A pilot study of CPT-11 and cisplatin for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma”. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 29, 434.

[4] Kita T., Kikuchi Y., Kudoh K., Takano M., Goto T., Hirata J., et al.: “Exploratory study of effective chemotherapy to clear cell carcinoma of the ovary”. Oncol. Rep., 2000, 7, 327.

[5] Takano M., Kikuchi Y., Yaegashi N., Suzuki M., Tsuda H., Sagae S., et al.: “Adjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride and cisplatin for clear cell carcinoma of the ovary”. Oncol. Rep., 2006, 16, 1301.

[6] http://gcig.igcs.org/files/JGOG3017_Protocol.pdf. accessed on June 13, 2012.

[7] Ando Y., Saka H., Ando M., Sawa T., Muro K., Ueoka H., et al.: “Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis”. Cancer Res., 2000, 60, 6921.

[8] Iyer L., Das S., Janisch L., Wen M., Ramírez J., Karrison T., et al.: “UGT1A1*28 polymorphism as a determinant of irinotecan disposition and toxicity”. Pharmacogenomics J., 2002, 2, 43.

[9] Innocenti F., Undevia S.D., Iyer L., Chen P.X., Das S., Kocherginsky M., et al.: “Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 1382.

[10] Marcuello E., Altés A., Menoyo A., Del Rio E., Gómez-Pardo M., Baiget M.: “UGT1A1 gene variations and irinotecan treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer”. Br. J. Cancer, 2004, 91, 678.

[11] Rouits E., Boisdron-Celle M., Dumont A., Guérin O., Morel A., Gamelin E.: “Relevance of different UGT1A1 polymorphisms in irinotecan-induced toxicity: a molecular and clinical study of 75 patients”.Clin. Cancer Res., 2004; 10, 5151.

[12] Hoskins J.M., Goldberg R.M., Qu P., Ibrahim J.G., McLeod H.L.: “UGT1A1*28 genotype and irinotecan-induced neutropenia: Dose matters”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 1290.

[13] Palomaki G.E., Bradley L.A., Douglas M.P., Kolor K., Dotson W.D.: ”Can UGT1A1 genotyping reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan? An evidence-based review”. Genet. Med. 2009, 11, 21.

[14] Liu J.Y., Qu K., Sferruzza A.D., Bender R.A.: “Distribution of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism in Caucasian and Asian populations in the US: a genomic analysis of 138 healthy individuals”. AntiCancer Drugs, 2007, 18, 693.

[15] Saito A., Kawamoto M., Kamatani N.: “Association study between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 199 drug-related genes and commonly measured quantitative traits of 752 healthy Japanese subjects”. J. Hum. Genet., 2009, 54, 317.

[16] Han J.Y., Lim H.S., Shin E.S., Yoo Y.K., Park Y.H., Lee J.E. et al.:” Comprehensive analysis of UGT1A polymorphisms predictive for pharmacokinetics and treatment outcome in patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer treated with irinotecan and cisplatin”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 2237.

[17] Sai K., Saito Y., Sakamoto H., Shirao K., Kurose K., Saeki M., et al.: “Importance of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1( *)6 for irinotecan toxicities in Japanese cancer patients”. Cancer Lett., 2008, 261, 165.

[18] Takano M., Kato M., Yoshikawa T., Sasaki N., Hirata J., Furuya K., et al.: ”Clinical significance of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6 for toxicities of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin in gynecologic cancers: a prospective multi-institutional study”. Oncology, 2009, 76, 315.

[19] Hasegawa Y., Sarashina T., Ando M., Kitagawa C., Mori A., Yoneyama M., et al.: “Rapid detection of UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms by newly developed Invader assay”. Clin. Chem., 2004, 50, 1479.

[20] Sparreboom A., de Brujin P., de Jonge M.J., Loos W.J., Stoter G., Verweij J., et al.: “Liquid chromatograpohic determination of irinotecan and three major metabolites in human plasma, urine, and feces”. J. Chromatogr. B. Biomed. Sci. Appl., 1998, 712, 225.

[21] Therasse P., Arbuck S.G., Eisenhauer E.A., Wanders J., Kaplan R.S., Rubinstein L., et al.: “New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors (RECIST) guidelines”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2000, 92, 205.

[22] http://www.flinders.edu.au/medicine/sites/clinical-pharmacology/ugt-homepage.cfm UDP Glucuronosyltransferase Homepage: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders University School of Medicine, Adelaide, Australia. accessed on June 13, 2012.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top