Article Data

  • Views 476
  • Dowloads 128

Original Research

Open Access

Histopathological correlation of splenic disease with radiological and surgical findings: should we incorporate splenectomy into standard procedures for disseminated Müllerian adenocarcinoma?

  • A. Phillips1,*,
  • R. Pounds1
  • J. Balega1
  • K. Singh1

1Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Birmingham City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3431.2016 Vol.37,Issue 5,October 2016 pp.678-684

Published: 10 October 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): A. Phillips E-mail: drandyphillips@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of both preoperative radiological and intraoperative identification of splenic disease in cases of advanced and recurrent gynaecological malignancy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of all splenectomies performed during surgeries for disseminated gynaecological malignancy at the Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre between May 21st, 2008 and January 31st, 2015. Results: Forty-one women were identified, most of whom had Stage 3C, high grade, serous Mullerian adenocarcinomas. Thirty-seven (90.2%) spleens were removed because of intraoperative suspicion of disease and the remaining four (9.8%) were removed following inadvertent injury. No spleens were detected radiologically that did not have obvious macroscopic disease. The PPV for the preoperative and intraoperative detection of splenic disease were 88.9% and 91.9%, respectively. Half of the spleens removed following inadvertent injury had disease identified following histopathological examination. Conclusion: Intraoperative identification of splenic disease correlates well with histopathological examination. However, in 50% of splenectomies performed following inadvertent trauma and where disease was not suspected, metastases were identified.

Keywords

Splenectomy; Gynaecological malignancy; Positive predictive value.

Cite and Share

A. Phillips,R. Pounds,J. Balega,K. Singh. Histopathological correlation of splenic disease with radiological and surgical findings: should we incorporate splenectomy into standard procedures for disseminated Müllerian adenocarcinoma? . European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(5);678-684.

References

[1] Eisenkop S.M., Friedman R.L., Wang H.J.: “Complete cytoreductive surgery is feasible and maximizes survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 69, 103.

[2] Chi D.S., Eisenhauer E.L., Zivanovic O., Sonoda Y., Abu-Rustum N.R., Levine D.A, et al.: “Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 114, 26.

[3] Colombo P.E., Mourregot A., Fabbro M., Gutowski M., Saint- Aubert B., Quenet F., et al.: “Aggressive surgical strategies in advanced ovarian cancer: a monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC andIV patients”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2009, 35, 135.

[4] Aletti G.D., Dowdy S.C., Gostout B.S., Jones M.B., Stanhope C.R., Wilson T.O., et al.: “Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 107, 77.

[5] Sehouli J., Senyuva F., Fotopoulou C., Neumann U., Denkert C.,Werner L., et al.: “Intra- abdominal tumor dissemination pattern and surgical outcome in 214 patients with primary ovarian cancer”. J. Surg. Oncol., 2009, 99, 424.

[6] Tanner E.J., Long K.C., Feffer J.B., Leitao M.M., Jr., Abu-Rustum N.R., Barakat R.R., et al.: “Parenchymal splenic metastasis is an independent negative predictor of overall survival in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 128, 28.

[7] Gemignani M.L., Chi D.S., Gurin C.C., Curtin J.P., Barakat R.R.: “Splenectomy in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 72, 407.

[8] Manci N., Bellati F., Muzii L., Calcagno M., Alon S.A., Pernice M., et al.: “Splenectomy during secondary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer disease recurrence: surgical and survival data”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 13, 1717.

[9] Uzan C., Bontoux L.M., Gouy S., Duvillard P., Pautier P., Lhomme C., et al.: “Correlation between macroscopic and microscopic diseases on splenectomies performed in the surgical management of ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2010, 20, 965.

[10] Eisenkop S.M., Spirtos N.M., Lin W.C.: “Splenectomy in the context of primary cytoreductive operations for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 100, 344.

[11] Waghorn D.J.: “Overwhelming infection in asplenic patients: current best practice preventive measures are not being followed”. J. Clin. Pathol., 2001, 54, 214.

[12] Davies J.M., Lewis M.P., Wimperis J., Rafi I., Ladhani S., Bolton- Maggs P.H., et al.: “Review of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen: prepared on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology by a working party of the Haemato-Oncology task force”. Br. J. Haematol., 2011, 155, 308.

[13] Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A.: “Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey”. Ann. Surg., 2004, 240, 205.

[14] Ayhan A., Al R.A., Baykal C., Demirtas E., Ayhan A., Yuce K.: “The influence of splenic metastases on survival in FIGO stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2004, 14, 51.

[15] McCann C.K., Growdon W.B., Munro E.G., Del Carmen M.G., Boruta D.M., Schorge J.O., et al.: “Prognostic significance of splenectomy as part of initial cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2011, 18, 2912.

[16] Morris M., Gershenson D.M., Burke T.W., Wharton J.T., Copeland L.J., Rutledge F.N.: “Splenectomy in gynecologic oncology: indications, complications, and technique”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1991, 43, 118.

[17] Nicklin J.L., Copeland L.J., O'Toole R.V., Lewandowski G.S.,Vaccarello L., Havenar L.P.: “Splenectomy as part of cytoredu ctive surgery for ovarian carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 58, 244.

[18] Scarabelli C., Gallo A., Campagnutta E., Carbone A.: “Splenectomyduring primary and secondary cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1998, 8, 215.

[19] Bilgin T., Ozerkan K., Ozan H.: “Splenectomy in cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.,2005, 271, 329. [20] Zapardiel I., Peiretti M., Zanagnolo V., Biffi R., Bocciolone L., Landoni F., et al.: “Splenectomy as part of primary cytoreductivesurgery for advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective coho rt study”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2012, 22, 968.

[21] Guidozzi F., Ball J.H.: “Extensive primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, 53, 326.

[22] Kuhn W., Florack G., Roder J., Schmalfeldt B., Pache L., Rust M., et al.: “The influence of upper abdominal surgery on perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced ovarian cancer FIGO III and FIGO IV”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1998, 8, 56.

[23] Goff B.A., Matthews B.J., Wynn M., Muntz H.G., Lishner D.M, Baldwin L.M.: “Ovarian cancer: patterns of surgical care across the United States”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 383.

[24] Eisenhauer E.L., Abu-Rustum N.R., Sonoda Y., Levine D.A.,Poynor E.A., Aghajanian C., et al.: “The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 1083.

[25] Magtibay P.M., Adams P.B., Silverman M.B., Cha S.S., Podratz K.C.: “Splenectomy as part of cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 102, 369.

[26] Kommoss S., Rochon J., Harter P., Heitz F., Grabowski J.P., Ewald-Riegler N., et al.: “Prognostic impact of additional extended surgical procedures in advanced-stage primary ovarian cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 17, 279.

[27] Vergote I., Trope C.G., Amant F., Kristensen G.B., Ehlen T., Johnson N., et al.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, 363, 943.

[28] Luyckx M., Leblanc E., Filleron T., Morice P., Darai E., Classe J.M., et al.: "Maximal cytoreduction in patients with FIGO stage IIIC to stage IV ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer in dayto- day practice: a Retrospective French Multicentric Study". Int.J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2012, 22, 1337.

[29] Barton D.P., Adib T., Butler J.: “Surgical practice of UK gynaecological oncologists in the treatment of primary advanced epithelialovarian cancer (PAEOC): a questionnaire survey”.

Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 131, 347.

[30] Gerestein C.G., Damhuis R.A., Burger C.W., Kooi G.S.: “Postoperative mortality after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 114, 523.

[31] Prehn R.T.: “The paradoxical effects of splenectomy on tumor growth”. Theor. Biol. Med. Model., 2006, 3, 23

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top