Article Data

  • Views 540
  • Dowloads 133

Original Research

Open Access

Application of combined intraperitoneal and intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy in senile patients with advanced ovarian cancer and massive ascites

  • E.L. Liu1,*,
  • R.R. Mi2
  • D.H. Wang 22
  • L.Q. Wang1
  • Y.M. Zhang1
  • W.M. Chen1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangshan Worker Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Tangshan, China

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3446.2017 Vol.38,Issue 2,April 2017 pp.209-213

Published: 10 April 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): E.L. Liu E-mail: enlingliu@126.com

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in senile patients with advanced ovarian cancer and ascites. Materials and Methods: One hundred eight senile patients with advanced ovarian cancer and ascites were randomly divided into two groups: experimental and control groups. Patients in the experimental group were treated with two courses of intraperitoneal combined with intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by cytoreductive surgery, and six courses of intravenous chemotherapy, while the patients in the control group only received cytoreductive surgery and six to eight courses of intravenous chemotherapy. Results: The operation duration, blood loss, ideal success rate of cytoreductive surgery, and prognosis of the two groups were then compared. Thirty-eight patients in the experimental group successfully received cytoreductive surgery, accounting for 74.14%, while only 23 patients in the control group received cytoreductive surgery successfully, accounting for 46%, showing significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0054). The mean blood loss and operation duration in the experimental group were significantly less than those in the control group (p < 0.001). However, the median survival and the median progression-free survival showed no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can obviously shorten the operation duration, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, and improve the ideal success rate of cytoreductive surgery, but does not obviously improve the prognosis.

Keywords

Abdominal combined with venous neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Senile patients; Advanced ovarian cancer; Ascites.

Cite and Share

E.L. Liu,R.R. Mi,D.H. Wang 2,L.Q. Wang,Y.M. Zhang,W.M. Chen. Application of combined intraperitoneal and intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy in senile patients with advanced ovarian cancer and massive ascites. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(2);209-213.

References

[1] National Center for Health Statistics.: “With special feature on socioeconomic status and health”. Hyattsville (MD). Health, United States, 2012, 2011, 1232.

[2] Tew W.P., Lichtman S.: “Ovarian cancer in older women”. Semin. Oncol., 2008, 35, 582.

[3] Tew W.P., Java J., Chi D., Menzin A., Lovecchio J.L., Bookman M.A., et al.: “Treatment outcomes for older women with advanced ovarian cancer: results from a phase III clinical trial (GOG182)”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2010, 28, 5030.

[4] Maas H.A., Kruitwagen R.F., Lemmens V.E., Goey S.H., Janssen- Heijnen M.L.: “The influence of age and co-morbidity on treatment and prognosis of ovarian cancer: a population-based study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 97, 104.

[5] Thigpen T., Brady M.F., Omura G.A., Creasman W.T., McGuire W.P., Hoskins W.J., et al.: “Ageasaprognostic factoring ovariancarcinoma. The Gynecologic Oncology Group experience”. Cancer, 1993, 71, 606.

[6] Hightower R.D., Nguyen H.N., Averette H.E., Hoskins W., Harrison T., Steren A.: “National survey of ovarian carcinoma. IV: patterns of care and related survival for older patients”. Cancer, 1994, 73, 377.

[7] Milam M.R., Tao X., Coleman R.L., Harrell R., Bassett R., Dos Reis R., et al.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with prolonged primary treatment intervals in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2011, 21, 66.

[8] Rowland M.R., Lesnock J.L., Farris C., Kelley J.L., Krivak T.C: “Cost-utility comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer in patients 65 years old or older”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2015, 212, 763.e1.

[9] Kehoe S., Hook J., Nankivell M., Jayson G.C., Kitchener H., Lopes T., et al.: “Chemotherapy or upfront surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: results from the MRC CHORUS trial”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2013, 31, abstr 5500.

[10] Poonawalla I.B., Lairson D.R., Chan W., Piller L.B., Du X.L.: “Costeffectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary surgery in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer”. Value Health, 2015, 18, 387.

[11] Seigal R., Naishadham D., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics”. CA. Cancer. J. Clin., 2012, 62, 10.

[12] Parkin D.M., Bray F., Ferlay J., Pisani P.: “Global cancer statistics”. CA Cancer. J. Clin., 2002, 2005, 74.

[13] Lopes J.A., Krikorian J.G., Reich S.D., Smyth R.D., Lee F.H., Issell B.F.: “Clinical pharmacology of intraperitoneal cisplatin”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1985, 20, 1.

[14] Markman M., Rowinsky E., Hakes T., Reichman B., Jones W., Lewis J.L. Jr., et al.: “Phase I trial of intraperitoneal taxol: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1992, 10, 1485.

[15] Markman M.: “Unresolve disease in the themotherapautic management of gynecologic malignanies”. Semin. Oncol., 2006, 33, S33.

[16] Elit L., Oliver T.K., Covens A., Kwon J., Fung M.F., Hirte H.W., et al.: “Intraperitoneal themtherapy in the first-line treatment of women with stage III epithealial ovarian cancer: a systemic review within metanalyses”. Cancer, 2007, 109, 692.

[17] Barrios M., Diaz J., Schroeder E., Estape R., Angel K., Estape R.: “Combination intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous and intraperitoneal Paclitaxel in the management of advanced-stage ovariancancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 123, 90S.

[18] Vergote I., Triope C.G., Amant F., Kristensen G.B., Ehlen T., Johnson N., et al.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, 363, 943.

[19] Zeimet A.G., Reimer D., Radl A.C., Reinthaller A., Schauer C., Petru E., et al.: “Pros and cons of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cance”. Anticancer. Res., 2009, 29, 2803.

[20] Berry E., Matthews K.S., Singh D.K., Buttin B.M., Lurain J.R., Alvarez R.D., et al.: “An outpatient intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen for advanced ovarian cancer”. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2009, 113, 63.

[21] Cascales Campos P., Gil J., Parrilla P.: “Morbidity and mortality outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients withprimary and recurrent advanced ovarian cancer”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2014, 40, 970.

[22] Fujiwara K., Nagao S., Aotani E., Hasegawa K.: “Principle and evolving role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer”. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother., 2013, 14, 1797.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top