Article Data

  • Views 519
  • Dowloads 108

Original Research

Open Access

Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors

  • B. Kocak1
  • U.K. Gulec2,*,
  • G. Khatib2
  • A.B. Guzel2
  • D. Gumurdulu3
  • S. Paydas4
  • M.A. Vardar2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hakkari Goverment Hospital, Hakkari, Turke

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey

3Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey

4Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3459.2017 Vol.38,Issue 5,October 2017 pp.769-774

Published: 10 October 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): U.K. Gulec E-mail: ukucukgoz@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: In this study the authors aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of sex-cord stromal tumors (SCST). Materials and Methods: The medical and pathological records of patients with SCST who were operated and followed up in a tertiary university clinic between March 1991 and October 2013 were reviewed. Clinical, surgical and pathological characteristics, follow-up data of the patients, and the effect of this parameters on survival were investigated. Results: One hundred and three women with a mean age of 45 ± 12.8 (range 16-78) were included. Histopathological diagnosis was found as granulosa cell tumor in 95 (92.2%), Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (SLCT) in six (5.8%), Leydig cell tumor (LCT) in one, and Sertoli cell tumor (SCT) in one of the cases. Sixty-eight percent of the patients had Stage I, 8.7% Stage II, 15.5% Stage III, and 6.8% had Stage IV disease. On univariate analysis; stage, age greater than 50 years, suboptimal cytoreduction, bilaterality, and non-BEP chemotherapy were determined as poor prognostic indicators. On multivariate analysis, age, stage, and optimal cytoreduction were found to be independent prognostic factors for overall survival, while only optimal cytoreduction was detected as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS). Fertility-sparing surgical procedures (FSS) were performed in 22 patients (21.4%). Among these 22 cases 16 (72.7%) pregnancies (13 resulted in a live birth and three in abortion) were achieved through a median period of 72 months (24-240). Conclusion: It was concluded that the most effective parameters on survival were stage and optimal cytoreduction. FSS is an effective approach for preserving the reproductive functions of young patients with SCST.

Keywords

Sex-cord stromal tumors; Granulosa cell tumor; Prognostic factor; Overall survival (OS); Disease-free survival (DFS); Fertility-sparing surgery.

Cite and Share

B. Kocak,U.K. Gulec,G. Khatib,A.B. Guzel,D. Gumurdulu,S. Paydas,M.A. Vardar. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(5);769-774.

References

[1] Haroon S., Zia A., Idress R., Memon A., Fatıma S., Kayani N.: “Clinicopathological spectrum of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors; 20 years’ retrospective study in a developing country”. J. Ovarian Res., 2013, 6, 87.

[2] Pectasides D., Pectasides E., Psyrri A.: “Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary”. Cancer Treat. Rev., 2008, 34, 1.

[3] Lawrence M.R.: “Recent advances in the pathology and classification of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2006, 25, 199.

[4] Sehouli J., Drescher F.S., Mustea A., Elling D., Friedmann W., Kühn W., et al.: “Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: 10 years follow-up data of 65 patients”. Anticancer Res., 2004, 24, 1223.

[5] Stuart G.C., Dawson L.M.: “Update on granulosa cell tumours of ovary”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 15, 33.

[6] Stenwig J.T., Hazekamp J.T., Beecham J.B.: “Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. A clinicopathological study off 118 cases with longterm follow-up”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1979, 7, 136.

[7] Sun H.D., Lin H., Jao M.S., Wang K.L., LiouW.S., Hung Y.C., et al.: “A long-term follow-up study of 176 cases with adult-type ovarian granulosa cell tumors”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 124, 244.

[8] Villella J., Herrmann F.R., Kaul S., Lele S., Marchetti D., Natiella J., et al.: “Clinical and pathological predictive factors in women with adult-type granulosa cell tumor of the ovary”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2007, 26, 154.

[9] Gui T., Cao D., Shen K., Yang J., Zhang Y., Yu Q., et al.: “A clinicopathological analysis of cases of ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 127, 384.

[10] Shim S.H., Lee S.J., Kim D.Y., Kim J., Kim S.N., Kang S.B., et al.: “A long-term follow-up study of 91 cases with ovarian granulosa cell tumors”. Anticancer Res., 2014, 34, 1001.

[11] Tangir J., Zelterman D., Ma W., Schwartz P.E.: “Reproductive function after conservative surgery and chemotherapy for malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 101, 251.

[12] Park J.Y., Jin K.L., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Kim K.R., et al.: “Surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of patient with adult granulosa cell tumors of the overy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 125, 80.

[13] Kleppe M., Amkreutz L.C., Van Gorp T., Slangen B.F., Kruse A.J., Kruitwagen R.F.: “Lymph-node metastasis in stage I and II sex cord stromal and malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary: a systematic review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 133, 124.

[14] Ranganath R., Sridevi V., Shirley S.S., Shantha V.: “Clinical and pathologic prognostic factors in adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2008, 18, 929.

[15] Stenberg W.H., Dhurandhar H.N.: “Functional ovarian tumors of stromal and sex cord origin”. Hum. Pathol., 1977, 8, 565.

[16] Fujimoto T., Sakuragi N., Okuyama K., Fujıno T., Yamashita K., Yamashiro S., et al.: “Histopathological prognostic factors of adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2001, 80, 1069.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top