Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in breast cancer – a review

The early detection of breast cancer is essential for its timely diagnosis and treatment. Many imaging modalities are continually being developed to screen and diagnose breast cancer at an early stage. Especially, ultrasound (US) is one of useful diagnostic tools to distinguish benign from malignant masses of the breast. However, the US image has some limitations, such as low resolution and low contrast, speckle noise, and blurry edges between various organs. Recent technological advancements in the area resulted in development of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) that could increase the diagnostic confidence for a physician and provide a possible solution to improve the positive predictive value of breast biopsy. The purpose of the present review article was to explore the advantages and technical advancements of ABVS for diagnosing breast cancer patients.

Breast cancer; ABVS; Ultrasound; Automation; Retraction; Ductal carcinoma.

[1] BCIA: “Breast Cancer Fact Sheet”, 2012. Available at: http://www. bcia.org.au/docview.aspx?id=92

[2] Kuni C.C.: “Mammography in the 1990s: a plea for objective doctors and informed patients”. Am. J. Prev. Med., 1993, 9, 185.

[3] Zhang Q., Hu B., Li W.B.: “Detection of breast lesions using an automated breast volume scanner system”. J. Int. Med. Res., 2012, 40, 300.

[4] Flobbe K., Nelemans P.J., Kessels A.G., Beets G.L., von Meyenfeldt M.F., van Engelshoven J.M.: “The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer: a systematic review”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2002, 38, 1044.

[5] Kaplan S.S.: “Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue”. Radiol., 2001, 221, 641.

[6] Wojcinski S., Farrokh A., Hille U., Wiskirchen J., Gyapong S., Soliman A.A., et al.: “The Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS): initial experiences in lesion detection compared with conventional handheld B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study of 50 cases”. Int. J. Womens Health, 2011, 3, 337.

[7] Wenkel E., Heckmann M., Heinrich M., Schwab S.A., Uder M., Schulz-Wendtland R., et al.: “Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification—a pilot study”. Rofo., 2008, 180, 804.

[8] Lin X., Wang J., Han F., Fu J., Li A.: “Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2011, 81, 873.

[9] Kelly K.M., Dean J., Lee S.J., Comulada W.S.: “Breast cancer detection: radiologists’ performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound”. Eur. Radiol., 2010, 20, 2557.

[10] Tozaki M., Fukuma E.: “Accuracy of determining preoperative cancer extent measured by automated breast ultrasonography”. Jpn. J. Radiol., 2010, 28, 771.

[11] Lin X., Wang J., Han F., Fu J., Li A.: “Analysis of eightyone cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound”. Euro. J. Radiol., 2012, 81, 873.

[12] Tozaki M., Isobe S., Yamaguchi M., Ogawa Y., Kohara M., Joo C., et al.: “Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner”. Jpn. J. Radiol., 2010, 28, 325.

[13] Ernster V.L., Barclay J., Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Henderson C.: “Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast”. JAMA, 1996, 275, 913.

[14] Soo M.S., Rosen E.L., Baker J.A., Vo T.T., Boyd B.A.: “Negative Predictive Value of Sonography with Mammography in Patients with Palpable Breast Lesions. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 2001, 177, 1167.

[15] Hofvind S., Ponti A., Patnick J., Ascunce N., Njor S., Broeders M., et al.: “False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes”. J. Med. Screen., 2012, 19, 57.

[16] Kopans D.B.: “Breast imaging”. 3rded. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.

[17] Kolb T.M., Lichy J., Newhouse J.H.: “Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations”. Radiology, 2002, 225, 165.

[18] Moss H.A., Britton P.D., Flower C.D., Freeman A.H., Lomas D.J., Warren R.M.: “How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?” Clin. Radiol., 1999, 54, 676.

[19] Novak D.: “Indications for and comparative diagnostic value of combined ultrasound and X-ray mammography”. Eur. J. Radiol., 1983, 3, 299.

[20] Taylor K.J., Merritt C., Piccoli C., Schmidt R., Rouse G., Fornage B., et al.: “Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses”. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 2002, 28, 19.

[21] Peart O.: “Mammography and breast imaging”. New York: McGraw- Hill, 2005.

[22] Langton C.M., Palmer S.B., Porter R.W.: “The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone”. Eng. Med., 1984, 13, 89.

[23] Tozaki M., Isobe S., Yamaquchi M., Ogawa Y., Kohara M., Joo C., Fukama E.: “Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner”. Jpn. J. Radiol., 2010, 28, 325.

[24] Xiao Y., Chen Z., Zhou Q., Wang Z.: “The efficacy of automated breast volume scanning over conventional ultrasonography among patients with breast lesions”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2015 131, 293.

[25] Grady I., Gorsuch-Rafferty H., Hansen P.: “Sonographic tomography for the preoperative staging of breast cancer prior to surgery”. J. Ultrasound, 2010, 13, 41.