Article Data

  • Views 693
  • Dowloads 129

Original Research

Open Access

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of endometrial serous carcinoma

  • G.H. Yu1
  • J.Wang2
  • G.M. Qu1
  • Z.H. Gong3
  • P. Li3
  • J. Chen2,*,
  • H.B. Wang4

1 Pathology Department, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai(China)

2Central Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai(China)

3Oncology Department, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai(China)

4School of Pharmacy, Yantai University, Yantai (China)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3553.2018 Vol.39,Issue 1,February 2018 pp.53-57

Published: 10 February 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): J. Chen E-mail: chenjianyt@163.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To discuss the clinicopathological features, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC). Materials and Methods: The clinical information of 33 patients aged 44-73 years, admitted to Yantai Huhuangding Hospital for surgical treatment of ESC between January 2003 and December 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Immunohistochemistry analysis of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and mutant type p53 (MTP53) markers were performed and their correlation with the clinical features and prognosis of ESC were studied. Results: Among all cases, 81.82% were ER− / PR− and 72.73% were MTP53+. Expression of ER, PR, and MTP53 markers were not affected by age, tumor size, infiltration depth, tumor staging or metastasis. P53mutation might be closely related to the tumorigenesis of ESC and lymphatic metastasis was a predictive factor for poor prognosis. Conclusion: This study provided us a better understanding of this rare type of carcinoma and could benefit future works of gynecologists, oncologists, and pathologists.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Serous carcinoma; Mutant type p53; MTP53; Prognosis.

Cite and Share

G.H. Yu,J.Wang,G.M. Qu,Z.H. Gong,P. Li,J. Chen,H.B. Wang. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of endometrial serous carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(1);53-57.

References

[1] SGO Clinical Practice Endometrial Cancer Working Group, Burke W.M., Orr J., Leitao M., Salom E., Gehrig P., et al.: “Endometrial cancer: a review and current management strategies: part I”. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 134, 385.

[2] Porter S.: “Endometrial cancer”. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2002; 18:200.

[3] Berchuck A., Boyd J. “Molecular basis of endometrial cancer”. Cancer , 1995, 76, 2034.

[4] Wang Y., Xue F., Broaddus R.R., Tao X., Xie S.S., Zhu Y.: “Clinicopathological features in endometrial carcinoma associated with Lynch syndrome in China”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2009, 19, 651.

[5] Setiawan V.W., Yang H.P., Pike M.C., McCann S.E., Yu H., Xiang Y.B., et al.: “Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors?”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2013, 31, 2607.

[6] Park J.Y., Nam J.H., Kim Y.T., Kim Y.M., Kim J.H., Kim D.Y., et al.: “Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients”. Virchows. Arch., 2013, 462, 289.

[7] Oncology F.C.o.G: “Current FIGO staging for cancer of the vagina, fallopian tube, ovary, and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 3.

[8] Kiernan J.A.: Histological and Histochemical Methods: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Bloxham, UK: Scion, 2008.

[9] Sun D.Z., Xu L., Wei P.K., Liu L., He J.: “Syndrome differentiation in traditional Chinese medicine and E-cadherin/ICAM-1 gene protein expression in gastric carcinoma”. World J. Gastroenterol., 2007, 13, 4321.

[10] Daniilidou K., Frangou-Plemenou M., Grammatikakis J., Grigoriou O., Vitoratos N., Kondi-Pafiti A.: “Prognostic significance and diagnostic value of PTEN and p53 expression in endometrial carcinoma. A retrospective clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study”. J. BUON., 2013, 18, 195.

[11] Semaan A., Mert I., Munkarah A.R., Bandyopadhyay S., Mahdi H.S., Winer I.S., et al.: “Clinical and pathologic characteristics of serous carcinoma confined to the endometrium: a multi-institutional study”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2013, 32, 181.

[12] Garg G., Gao F., Wright J.D., Hagemann A.R., Zighelboim I., Mutch D.G., Powell M.A.: “The risk of lymph node metastasis with positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer , 2013, 23, 90.

[13] Owings R.A., Quick C.M.: “Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 2014, 138, 484.

[14] Semere L.G., Ko E., Johnson N.R., Vitonis A.F., Phang L.J., Cramer D.W., Mutter G.L.: “Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: clinical correlates and outcomes”. Obstet. Gynecol.,2011, 118, 21.

[15] Darvishian F., Hummer A.J., Thaler H.T., Bhargava R., Linkov I., Asher M., Soslow R.A.: “Serous endometrial cancers that mimic endometrioid adenocarcinomas: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a group of problematic cases”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2004, 28, 1568.

[16] Mhawech-Fauceglia P., Yan L., Liu S., Pejovic T.: “ER+ /PR+ /TFF3+ /IMP3- immunoprofile distinguishes endometrioid from serous and clear cell carcinomas of the endometrium: a study of 401 cases”. Histopathology, 2013, 62, 976.

[17] Silva E.G., Deavers M.T., Parlow A.F., Gershenson D.M., Malpica A.: “Calcifications in ovary and endometrium and their neoplasms”. Mod. Pathol., 2003, 16, 219.

[18] Singh P., Scurry J., Proietto A.: “Lethal endometrial recurrence after cone biopsy for microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2008, 34, 413.

[19] Hu W.W., Tao J.H., Li G.M., Xu X., Yang X.M.: “Value of ER, VIM, CEA and p16 detection in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas”. J. Southern. Med. Univ., 2010, 30, 526.

[20] Vang R., Whitaker B.P., Farhood A.I., Silva E.G., Ro J.Y., Deavers M.T.: “Immunohistochemical analysis of clear cell carcinoma of the gynecologic tract”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2001, 20, 252.

[21] Arai T., Watanabe J., Kawaguchi M., Kamata Y., Nishimura Y., Jobo T., Kuramoto H.: “Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is a biologically distinct entity from endometrioid adenocarcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2006, 16, 391.

[22] Marino-Enriquez A., Gonzalez-Rocha T., Burgos E., Stolnicu S., Mendiola M., Nogales F.F., Hardisson D.: “Transitional cell carcinoma of the endometrium and endometrial carcinoma with transitional cell differentiation: a clinicopathologic study of 5 cases and review of the literature”. Hum. Pathol., 2008, 39, 1606.

[23] Zhang A.M., Zhang L.X., Zhang H.J. “Transitional cell carcinoma of the endometrium: a clinicopathological study of 3 cases”. Chin. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol., 2007, 23, 524.

[24] Zhu J., Sun H.: “Respective analysis of 54 cases uterine serous carcinoma”. Fudan Univ. J. Med. Sci., 2008, 35, 914.

[25] Kovalev S., Marchenko N.D., Gugliotta B.G., Chalas E., Chumas J., Moll U.M.: “Loss of p53 function in uterine papillary serous carcinoma”. Hum. Pathol. 1998, 29, 613.

[26] King S.A., Adas A.A., LiVolsi V.A., Takahashi H., Behbakht K., Mc-Govern P., et al.: “Expression and mutation analysis of the p53 gene in uterine papillary serous carcinoma”. Cancer, 1995, 75, 2700.

[27] Zheng W., Cao P., Zheng M., Kramer E.E., Godwin T.A. “p53 overexpression and bcl-2 persistence in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of papillary serous and endometrioid subtypes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 61, 167.

[28] Li M.Z., Wang Z.Q., Zhao L.J., Li X.P., Wang J.L., Zhang C.F., Wei L.H.: “Predictors of recurrence and prognosis in patients with stage I and II endometrial carcinoma”. Chin. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 49, 455.

[29] Mhawech-Fauceglia P., Herrmann R.F., Kesterson J., Izevbaye I., Lele S., Odunsi K.: “Prognostic factors in stages II/III/IV and stages III/IV endometrioid and serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 36, 1195.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top