Article Data

  • Views 499
  • Dowloads 135

Original Research

Open Access

Post-operative fever in open compared with robotic hysterectomies for endometrial cancer

  • R. Drenchko1
  • C. Chung1
  • K.J. Manahan1
  • J.P. Geisler1,*,

1Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Newnan, GA, USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3615.2017 Vol.38,Issue 5,October 2017 pp.724-726

Published: 10 October 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): J.P. Geisler E-mail: Geisler.jp@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: There are numerous explanations behind the presence of post-operative fever that patients may experience. The aim of this study was to determine if temperatures ≥ 38.0°C were more common in patients undergoing open or robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: 150 women were retrospectively analyzed; half underwent robotic hysterectomy and the other half underwent an open approach. A febrile episode was a single temperature of ≥ 38.3°C or a sustained temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for more than one hour. Temperatures were recorded and compared for 48 hours postoperatively. Results: Febrile episodes of 38.0-38.3°C were seen in 33.3% of patients undergoing an open approach and 12% of patients undergoing robotic surgery (p = 0.003) within two days of surgery. Temperatures of ≥ 38.3°C were only seen in three patients in the open arm and one in the robotic arm (4% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.3). Those few who experienced temperatures ≥ 38.3°C were all found to have infections. Conclusions: There is a significantly decreased incidence of a post-operative fever in a patient who undergoes a robotic hysterectomy instead of an open abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Keywords

Robotic hysterectomy; Laparotomy; Fever.

Cite and Share

R. Drenchko,C. Chung,K.J. Manahan,J.P. Geisler. Post-operative fever in open compared with robotic hysterectomies for endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(5);724-726.

References

[1] Roberts J., Barnes W., Pennock M.: “Diagnostic accuracy of fever as a measure of postoperative pulmonary complications”. Heart Lung, 1988, 17, 166.

[2] Nayarun M., Medinilla S.P.: “Fever in postoperative patient”. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am., 2013, 31, 1045.

[3] Mavros M.N., Velmahos G.C., Falagas M.E.: “Atelectasis as a cause of postoperative fever: where is the clinical evidence?” Chest, 2011, 140, 418.

[4] Engoren M.: “Lack of association between atelectasis and fever”. Chest, 1995, 107, 81.

[5] Shields R.T.: “Pathogenesis of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis an experimental study”. Arch. Surg., 1949, 48, 489.

[6] Dauleh M.I., Rahman S., Townell N.H.: “Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of postoperative temperature”. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb., 1995, 40, 116.

[7] Hall J.C., Tarala R.A., Hall J.L.: “A case-control study of postoperative pulmonary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy”. J. Laparoendosc. Surg., 1996, 6, 87.

[8] Salom E.M., Schey D., Penalver M., Gomez-Marin O., Lambrou N., Almeida Z., et al.: “The safety of incidental appendectomy at the time of abdominal hysterectomy”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 189, 1563.

[9] US Department of Health and Human Services: “Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)”, Version 4.03. 2010.

[10] Fanning J., Sweetland D.J., Hilgers R.D.: “A prospective randomized trial of ampicillin sulbactam vs cefoxitin prophylaxis for radical gynecologic surgery”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1996, 6, 298.

[11] Fanning J., Neuhoff R.A., Brewer J.E., Castaneda T., Marcotte M.P., Jacobson R.L.: “Frequency and Yield of Postoperative Fever Evaluation”. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 6, 252.

[12] Vermeulen H., Storm-Versloot M.N., Goossens A.: “Diagnostic accuracy of routine postoperative body temperature measurements”. Clin. Infect. Dis., 2005, 40, 1404.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top