Article Data

  • Views 1818
  • Dowloads 139

Original Research

Open Access

Post-operative fever in open compared with robotic hysterectomies for endometrial cancer

  • R. Drenchko1
  • C. Chung1
  • K.J. Manahan1
  • J.P. Geisler1,*,

1Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Newnan, GA, USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3615.2017 Vol.38,Issue 5,October 2017 pp.724-726

Published: 10 October 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): J.P. Geisler E-mail: Geisler.jp@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: There are numerous explanations behind the presence of post-operative fever that patients may experience. The aim of this study was to determine if temperatures ≥ 38.0°C were more common in patients undergoing open or robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: 150 women were retrospectively analyzed; half underwent robotic hysterectomy and the other half underwent an open approach. A febrile episode was a single temperature of ≥ 38.3°C or a sustained temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for more than one hour. Temperatures were recorded and compared for 48 hours postoperatively. Results: Febrile episodes of 38.0-38.3°C were seen in 33.3% of patients undergoing an open approach and 12% of patients undergoing robotic surgery (p = 0.003) within two days of surgery. Temperatures of ≥ 38.3°C were only seen in three patients in the open arm and one in the robotic arm (4% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.3). Those few who experienced temperatures ≥ 38.3°C were all found to have infections. Conclusions: There is a significantly decreased incidence of a post-operative fever in a patient who undergoes a robotic hysterectomy instead of an open abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Keywords

Robotic hysterectomy; Laparotomy; Fever.

Cite and Share

R. Drenchko,C. Chung,K.J. Manahan,J.P. Geisler. Post-operative fever in open compared with robotic hysterectomies for endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(5);724-726.

References

[1] Roberts J., Barnes W., Pennock M.: “Diagnostic accuracy of fever as a measure of postoperative pulmonary complications”. Heart Lung, 1988, 17, 166.

[2] Nayarun M., Medinilla S.P.: “Fever in postoperative patient”. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am., 2013, 31, 1045.

[3] Mavros M.N., Velmahos G.C., Falagas M.E.: “Atelectasis as a cause of postoperative fever: where is the clinical evidence?” Chest, 2011, 140, 418.

[4] Engoren M.: “Lack of association between atelectasis and fever”. Chest, 1995, 107, 81.

[5] Shields R.T.: “Pathogenesis of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis an experimental study”. Arch. Surg., 1949, 48, 489.

[6] Dauleh M.I., Rahman S., Townell N.H.: “Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of postoperative temperature”. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb., 1995, 40, 116.

[7] Hall J.C., Tarala R.A., Hall J.L.: “A case-control study of postoperative pulmonary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy”. J. Laparoendosc. Surg., 1996, 6, 87.

[8] Salom E.M., Schey D., Penalver M., Gomez-Marin O., Lambrou N., Almeida Z., et al.: “The safety of incidental appendectomy at the time of abdominal hysterectomy”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 189, 1563.

[9] US Department of Health and Human Services: “Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)”, Version 4.03. 2010.

[10] Fanning J., Sweetland D.J., Hilgers R.D.: “A prospective randomized trial of ampicillin sulbactam vs cefoxitin prophylaxis for radical gynecologic surgery”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1996, 6, 298.

[11] Fanning J., Neuhoff R.A., Brewer J.E., Castaneda T., Marcotte M.P., Jacobson R.L.: “Frequency and Yield of Postoperative Fever Evaluation”. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 6, 252.

[12] Vermeulen H., Storm-Versloot M.N., Goossens A.: “Diagnostic accuracy of routine postoperative body temperature measurements”. Clin. Infect. Dis., 2005, 40, 1404.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top