Article Data

  • Views 577
  • Dowloads 125

Original Research

Open Access

Impact of surgical optimality on the survival for patients diagnosed with clear cell carcinoma of ovary: a propensity score analysis with long-term follow-up

  • C.H. Lu1,2,3,4
  • Y.H. Chang4,5
  • C.R. Lai6
  • W.H. Lee4,5
  • Y. Chang4,5
  • C.M. Chuang4,5,7,*,

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung

2Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung

3Rong-Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University,Taichung

4Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei

5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei

6Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei

7Department of National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei (Taiwan)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3650.2018 Vol.39,Issue 2,April 2018 pp.180-186

Published: 10 April 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): C.M. Chuang E-mail: cmjuang@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: The authors aimed to investigate the impact of surgical optimality on clear cell carcinoma (CCC) versus serous adenocarcinoma of ovary (SAC). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected healthcare database in a single institution, recruiting consecutive patients diagnosed with Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer between January 2001 and December 2010, was conducted. Results: For optimal disease, median overall survival (95% confidence interval) was 57.1 (42.5−78.6) months for SAC and 52.6 (35.3−61.1) months for CCC, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.28, p = 0.222). For suboptimal disease, the corresponding value was 43.3 (36.5−58.2) months for SAC and 24.6 (21.9−37.1) months for CCC, respectively (hazard ratio = 2.33, p < 0.001). Conclusion: For optimal residual disease, CCC shows equal survival to SAC, while for suboptimal residual disease, CCC still shows very dismal outcome compared to SAC, suggesting the urgent need to test novel drugs to treat this subset of patients.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Clear cell carcinoma; Serous carcinoma; Optimal disease.

Cite and Share

C.H. Lu,Y.H. Chang,C.R. Lai,W.H. Lee,Y. Chang,C.M. Chuang. Impact of surgical optimality on the survival for patients diagnosed with clear cell carcinoma of ovary: a propensity score analysis with long-term follow-up. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(2);180-186.

References

[1] Heintz A.P., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Quinn M.A., Benedet J.L., Creasman W.T., et al.: “Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2006, 95, S161.

[2] Kennedy A.W., Markman M., Biscotti C.V., Emery J.D., Rybicki L.A.: “Survival probability in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 74, 108.

[3] Recio F.O., Piver M.S., Hempling R.E., Driscoll D.L.: “Lack of improved survival plus increase in thromboembolic complications in patients with clear cell carcinoma of the ovary treated with platinum versus nonplatinum-based chemotherapy”. Cancer, 1996, 78, 2157.

[4] Behbakht K., Randall T.C., Benjamin I., Morgan M.A., King S., Rubin S.C.: “Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 70, 255.

[5] Jin Y., Li Y., Pan L.: “The target therapy of ovarian clear cell carcinoma”. Onco. Targets Ther., 2014, 7, 1647.

[6] Godwin A.K., Meister A., O’Dwyer P.J., Huang C.S., Hamilton T.C., Anderson M.E.: “High resistance to cisplatin in human ovarian cancer cell lines is associated with marked increase of glutathione synthesis”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1992, 89, 3070.

[7] Kuwano M., Toh S., Uchiumi T., Takano H., Kohno K., Wada M.: “Multidrug resistance-associated protein subfamily transporters and drug resistance”. Anticancer Drug Des., 1999, 14, 123.

[8] Tsuda H., Ito Y.M., Ohashi Y., Wong K.K., Hashiguchi Y., Welch W.R., et al.: “Identification of overexpression and amplification of ABCF2 in clear cell ovarian adenocarcinomas by cDNA microarray analyses”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2005, 11, 6880.

[9] Gram I.T., Lukanova A., Brill I., Braaten T., Lund E., Lundin E., et al.: “Cigarette smoking and risk of histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer in the EPIC cohort study”. Int. J. Cancer, 2012, 130, 2204.

[10] Mink P.J., Sherman M.E., Devesa S.S.: “Incidence patterns of invasive and borderline ovarian tumors among white women and black women in the United States. Results from the SEER Program, 1978- 1998”. Cancer, 2002, 95, 2380.

[11] Mizuno M., Kikkawa F., Shibata K., Kajiyama H., Ino K., Kawai M., et al.: “Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary”. J. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 94, 138.

[12] Sung P.L., Chang Y.H., Chao K.C., Chuang C.M., Task Force on Systematic R.: “Meta-analysis of Ovarian C. Global distribution pattern of histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer: a database analysis and systematic review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 133, 147.

[13] Pectasides D., Pectasides E., Psyrri A., Economopoulos T.: “Treatment issues in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a different entity?” Oncologist., 2006, 11, 1089.

[14] Omura G.A., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Yordan E., Major F.J., Buchsbaum H.J., Park R.C.: “Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1991, 9, 1138.

[15] Pectasides D., Fountzilas G., Aravantinos G., Kalofonos C., Efstathiou H., Farmakis D., et al.: “Advanced stage clear-cell epithelial ovarian cancer: the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 102, 285.

[16] Goff B.A., Sainz de la Cuesta R., Muntz H.G., Fleischhacker D., Ek M., Rice L.W., et al.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in stage III disease”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 60, 412.

[17] Sugiyama T., Kamura T., Kigawa J., Terakawa N., Kikuchi Y., Kita T., et al.: “Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy”. Cancer, 2000, 88, 2584.

[18] Poorolajal J., Cheraghi Z., Irani A.D., Rezaeian S.: “Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement”. Epidemiol. Health., 2011, 33, e2011005.

[19] Austin P.C.: “An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies”. Multivariate Behav. Res., 2011, 46, 399.

[20] Sturmer T., Joshi M., Glynn R.J., Avorn J., Rothman K.J., Schneeweiss S.: “A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods”. J. Clin. Epidemiol., 2006, 59, 437.

[21] Austin P.C.: “The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies”. Med. Decis. Making., 2009, 29, 661.

[22] Colombo P.E., Mourregot A., Fabbro M., Gutowski M., Saint-Aubert B., Quenet F., et al.: “Aggressive surgical strategies in advanced ovarian cancer: a monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC and IV patients”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2009, 35, 135.

[23] Hoskins W.J., Bundy B.N., Thigpen J.T., Omura G.A.: “The influence of cytoreductive surgery on recurrence-free interval and survival in small-volume stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1992, 47, 159.

[24] Thigpen J.T., Blessing J.A., Ball H., Hummel S.J., Barrett R.J.: “Phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with progressive ovarian carcinoma after platinum-based chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1994, 12, 1748.

[25] Austin P.C.: “A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003”. Stat. Med., 2008, 27, 2037.

[26] Ming K., Rosenbaum P.R.: “Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls”. Biometrics, 2000, 56, 118.

[27] Sturmer T., Schneeweiss S., Brookhart M.A., Rothman K.J., Avorn J., Glynn R.J.: “Analytic strategies to adjust confounding using exposure propensity scores and disease risk scores: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and short-term mortality in the elderly”. Am. J. Epidemiol., 2005, 161, 891.

[28] Austin P.C.: “The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios”. Stat. Med., 2013, 32, 2837.

[29] Burger R.A., Brady M.F., Bookman M.A., Fleming G.F., Monk B.J., Huang H., et al.: “Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2011, 365, 2473.

[30] Perren T.J., Swart A.M., Pfisterer J., Ledermann J.A., Pujade-Lauraine E., Kristensen G., et al.: “A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2011, 365, 2484.

[31] Aghajanian C., Blank S.V., Goff B.A., Judson P.L., Teneriello M.G., Husain A., et al.: “OCEANS: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2012, 30, 2039.

[32] Pujade-Lauraine E., Hilpert F., Weber B., Reuss A., Poveda A., Kristensen G., et al.: “Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: The AURELIA openlabel randomized phase III trial”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 32, 1302.

[33] Lim D., Oliva E.: “Precursors and pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma”. Pathology, 2013, 45, 229.

[34] Yamaguchi K., Mandai M., Oura T., Matsumura N., Hamanishi J., Baba T., et al.: “Identification of an ovarian clear cell carcinoma gene signature that reflects inherent disease biology and the carcinogenic processes”. Oncogene, 2010, 29, 1741.

[35] Okamoto T., Mandai M., Matsumura N., Yamaguchi K., Kondoh H., Amano Y., et al.: “Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta (HNF-1beta) promotes glucose uptake and glycolytic activity in ovarian clear cell carcinoma”. Mol. Carcinog., 2015, 54, 35.

[36] Matsumura N., Mandai M., Okamoto T., Yamaguchi K., Yamamura S., Oura T., et al.: “Sorafenib efficacy in ovarian clear cell carcinoma revealed by transcriptome profiling”. Cancer Sci., 2010, 101, 2658.

[37] Albano J.D., Ward E., Jemal A., Anderson R., Cokkinides V.E., Murray T., et al.: “Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2007, 99, 1384.

[38] Little R.J., Rubin D.B.: “Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches”. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 2000, 21, 121.

[39] Marcus S.M.: “Assessing non-consent bias with parallel randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials”. J. Clin. Epidemiol., 1997, 50, 823.

[40] Group GCIJGO [Internet]. Ovarian trial protocol version 3.1 (GCIG/JGOG3017) ; 2009. Available at: http://www.gcig.igcs.org/ files/JGOG3017_Protocol.pdf

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top