Article Data

  • Views 565
  • Dowloads 134

Original Research

Open Access

Low rate of cervical cancer among women with rising incidence of cervical cytological abnormalities. The unlearnt lesson

  • M.A. Freij1,*,
  • M.M. Khadra1
  • H.A.Abu Farsakh2
  • H.H. Saleh3
  • A.A. Ijmail2
  • B.O. Rahal1
  • M.H. Waldali4
  • N.S. Najeeb5
  • L.H. Tahtamouni5

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman (Jordan)

2The First Medical Laboratories, Amman

3 3 Elite Moms Clinic, Amman (Jordan)

4Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman (Jordan)

5Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, The Hashemite University, Zarqa (Jordan)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3722.2018 Vol.39,Issue 1,February 2018 pp.96-100

Published: 10 February 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): M.A. Freij E-mail: Mazen2k@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objectives: Cervical cancer is preceded by a group of epithelial cell abnormalities. However, there is insufficient data on cervical abnormalities in Jordan and the Middle East at large. The current study aimed at determining the prevalence of different cytological abnormalities in women in Jordan. In addition, it aimed at assessing the age specific cytological abnormalities in these women and analyzing the changing trends of epithelial cell abnormalities in cervical smear over a period of 15 years compared in three periods of five years each. Materials and Methods: 6,455 conventional cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) smear results obtained between January 2000 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Out of the 6,454 Pap smears analyzed, 5,645 (87.5%) were found adequate for reporting. A total number of 801 (14.2 %) cases had cervical epithelial abnormalities. A significant increase in cytological abnormalities was observed between 2000 and 2014. In addition, a significant increasing trend in cervical cytological abnormalities was noted between 2000 and 2014. The highest percentage of cytological abnormalities (20.1%) was found in women younger than 25 years old. In all of the age groups, the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) cytological abnormality was the most prevalent. Conclusions: Invasive cervical cancer is still a killer for young women in the developing countries. The present study may reflect a change in the sociosexual behavior over the last 15 years. The current work highlights the importance of awareness campaigns on the importance of cervical smear and the urgent need for initiating a cervical screening program in Jordan.

Keywords

Pap smear; Cervical cancer; HPV; Cervical screening program; Jordan.

Cite and Share

M.A. Freij,M.M. Khadra,H.A.Abu Farsakh,H.H. Saleh,A.A. Ijmail,B.O. Rahal,M.H. Waldali,N.S. Najeeb,L.H. Tahtamouni. Low rate of cervical cancer among women with rising incidence of cervical cytological abnormalities. The unlearnt lesson. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(1);96-100.

References

[1] Hikmat A., Attiga F., Mansour A.: “Cancer care in Jordan”. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Ther., 2015, 8, 64-70.

[2] Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., et al.: “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012”. Int. J. Cancer , 2015, 136, E359.

[3] Stewart S.L., Rim S.H., Gelb C.A.: “Physician knowledge and awareness of CA-125 as a screen for ovarian cancer in the asymptomatic, average-risk population”. Health Educ Behav., 2012, 39, 57.

[4] Ministry of Health Non-Communicable Diseases Directorate Jordan Cancer Registry: “Cancer Incidence in Jordan 2010”. Available at: http://www.moh.gov.jo/Documents/Annual Incidence of

cancer in Jordan 2010.pdf

[5] Guido R.: “Secondary prevention of cervical cancer part 2: initial management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test”. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 57, 292.

[6] Traut H.F., Papanicolaou G.N.: “Cancer of the teurus: the vaginal smear in its diagnosis”. Cal. West. Med., 1943, 59, 121.

[7] Cervical Screening Programme, England: 2000–01: “Statistical Bulletin 2001/22”. London: Government Statistical Service, 2001.

[8] Saslow D., Runowicz C.D., Solomon D., Moscicki A.B., Smith R.A., Eyre H.J., Cohen C.: “American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2002, 52, 342.

[9] Weinstock H., Stuart B., Cates W. Jr.: “Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates”. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health, 2004, 36, 6.

[10] Trottier H., Franco E.L.: “The epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infection”. Vaccine, 2006, 24, S1.

[11] Seoud M.: “Extended Middle East and North Africa: cervical cancer and human papillomavirus: can we make the case for prevention in this “relatively” low prevalence region?” Vaccine, 2013, 31 vii.

[12] El-Kak F.: “Sexuality and sexual health: constructs and expressions in the extended Middle East and North Africa”. Vaccine, 2013, 31, G45.

[13] Amarin Z.O., Badria L.F., Obeidat B.R.: “Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women”. East Mediterr. Health J., 2008, 14, 389.

[14] Burd E.M.: “Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer”. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 2003, 16, 1.

[15] Treacy A., Reynolds J., Kay E.W., Leader M., Grace A.: “Has the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy?” Diagn. Cytopathol., 2009, 37, 239.

[16] Coskun S., Can H., Turan S.: “Knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors and pap smear testing behavior among female primary health care workers: a study from south Turkey”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2013, 14, 6389.

[17] National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): “NHS Technol-ogy Appraisal Guidance 69. Guidance on the use of liquid-based cytology for cervical screening”. London, 2003. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta69/resources/guidance-on-theuse-of-liquidbased-cytology-for-cervical-screening-2294706450373

[18] Sigurdsson K.: “Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?” Cytopathology, 2013, 24, 254.

[19] Al Zaabi M., Al Muqbali S., Al Sayadi T., Al Ameeri S., Coetsee K., Balayah Z., Ortashi O.: “Age specific cytological abnormalities in women screened for cervical cancer in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2015, 16, 6375.

[20] Kapila K., Sharma P.N., George S.S., Al-Shaheen A., Al-Juwaiser A., Al-Awadhi R.: “Trends in epithelial cell abnormalities observed on cervical smears over a 21-year period in a tertiary care hospital in Kuwait”. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J., 2015, 15, e112-5.

[21] Al Nsour M., Brown D.W., Tarawneh M., Haddadin R., Walk H.: “Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in Jordan: findings from the behavioural risk factor surveillance system-2007”. TOPCANJ., 2012, 4, 1.

[22] Maaita M., Barakat M.: “Jordanian women’s attitudes towards cervical screening and cervical cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2002, 22, 421.

[23] Andersson S., Rylander E., Larsson B., Strand A., Silfversvard C.,Wilander E.: “The role of human papillomavirus in cervical adenocarcinoma carcinogenesis”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2001, 37, 246.

[24] Castellsague X., Diaz M., de Sanjose S., Munoz M., Herrero R., Franceschi S., et al.: “Worldwide human papillomavirus etiology of cervical adenocarcinoma and its cofactors: implications for screening and prevention. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2006, 98, 303.

[25] Ronco G., Dillner J., Elfstrom K.M., Tunesi S., Snijders P.J.F., Arbyn M., et al.: “Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials”. Lancet, 2014, 383, 524.

[26] Open Society Foundations: “Mapping Digital Media: Jordan”. Available at: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/mapping-digital-media-jordan-20131121.pdf

[27] Bosch F.X., Lorincz A., Muñoz .N, Meijer C.J., Shah K.V.: “The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer”. J. Clin. Pathol., 2002, 55, 244.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top