Article Data

  • Views 558
  • Dowloads 142

Original Research

Open Access

Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage endometrial cancer

  • L. Nejkovic1,*,
  • D.K. Tepavcevic2
  • V. Pazin1
  • D. Opric3
  • D. Filimonovic1
  • R. Anicic1
  • R. Sparic4
  • S. Mihajlovic1

1University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic “Narodni front”, Belgrade

2University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Epidemiology, Belgrade

3University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, Belgrade

4University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade (Serbia)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3821.2017 Vol.38,Issue 4,August 2017 pp.596-600

Published: 10 August 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): L. Nejkovic E-mail: lnejkovic@sbb.rs

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection procedure in Serbian sample of women with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Materials and Methods: In the period from March, 2015 to May 2016, all consecutive patients with histologically confirmed EC, were considered for enrolment in the study. Exclusion criteria included preoperative FIGO Stages II-IV, previous surgery that could influence the uterine lymphatic drainage, history of congenital uterus anomalies, duplex malignancies or deep vein thrombosis on lower extremities, and allergies to the contrast agent. Finally, 27 patients underwent SLN detection, followed by systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic data on all patients were evaluated. Results: The SLNs were identified in 25 patients, with overall detection rate of 92.6%. Twenty-two (81.5%) patients had bilateral, while 11.15% had unilateral intraoperative visualization of SLNs. Of the seven females with positive SLNs, at definitive histology evaluation, pelvic non-SLNs were metastatic in four (57.1%) cases and negative in three (42.9%) cases. The false-negative rate of sentinel procedure was 0%. The evaluation of prognostic values of SLN status, for prediction of presence of metastases in non-SLNs showed the negative predicive value of 100%, and the positive predictive value of 57.1%. Additionally, the sensitivity of SLN method in sample of women with early-stage EC was 100%, while the specificity was 86.9%. Conclusions: SLN procedure has good diagnostic performance and is reliable in prediction of the metastatic status of the regional pelvic lymph nodes in women with early-stage EC.

Keywords

Sentinel nodes; Endometrial cancer; Pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Cite and Share

L. Nejkovic,D.K. Tepavcevic,V. Pazin,D. Opric,D. Filimonovic,R. Anicic,R. Sparic,S. Mihajlovic. Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(4);596-600.

References

[1] Cote M.L., Ruterbusch J.J., Olson S.H., Lu K., Ali-Fehmi R.: “The growing burden of endometrial cancer: a major racial disparity affecting black women”. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 2015, 24, 1407.

[2] Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies on Endometrial Cancer:E”ndometrial cancer and oral contraceptives: an individual participant meta-analysis of 27,276 women with endometrial cancer 599 Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage endometrial cancer from 36 epidemiological studies”. Lancet Oncol., 2015, 16, 1061.

[3] Mehasseb M.K., Latimer J.A.: “Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma: an update”. Obstet. Gynecol. Int., 2012, 2012, 676032.

[4] Anton C., di Fávero G.M., Köhler C., Carvalho F.M., Baracat E.C., Carvalho J.P.: “Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer in developing countries: reasons to consider systematic two-step surgical treatment”. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2015, 70, 470.

[5] Favero G., Köhler C., Carvalho J.P.: “Endometrial cancer in the developing world: Isn’t it reasonable to perform surgical treatment systematically in 2 steps?” Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 822.

[6] Bogani G., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Ghezzi F., Rossetti D., Frigerio L., Mariani A.: “Management of endometrial cancer: issues and controversies”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2016, 37, 6 .

[7] Press J.Z., Gotlieb W.H.: “Controversies in the treatment of early stage endometrial carcinoma”. Obstet. Gynecol. Int., 2012, 2012, 578490.

[8] Koskas M., Fournier M., Vanderstraeten A., Walker F., Timmerman D., Vergote I., Amant F.: “Evaluation of models to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: a multicentre study”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2016, 61, 52.

[9] Wright J.D., Huang Y., Burke W.M., Tergas A.I., Hou J.Y., Hu J.C., et al.: “Influence of lymphadenectomy on survival for early-stage endometrial cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2016, 127, 109.

[10] Dowdy S.C.: “Improving oncologic outcomes for women with endometrial cancer: realigning our sights”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 133, 370.

[11] Khoury-Collado F., St Clair C., Abu-Rustum N.R.: “Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: an update”. Oncologist, 2016, 21, 461.

[12] Bogani G., Ditto A., Martinelli F., Signorelli M., Perotto S., Lorusso D., Raspagliesi F.: “A critical assessment on the role of sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 26, 252.

[13] Farghali M.M., Allam I.S., Abdelazim I.A., El-Kady O.S., Rashed A.R., Gareer W.Y., Sweed M.S.: “Accuracy of sentinel node in detecting lymph node metastasis in primary endometrial carcinoma”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2015, 16, 6691.

[14] Cormier B., Rozenholc A.T., Gotlieb W., Plante M., Giede C., Communities of Practice (CoP) Group of Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC): “Sentinel lymph node procedure in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and proposal for standardization of future research”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 138, 478.

[15] Niebling M.G., Pleijhuis R.G., Bastiaannet E., Brouwers A.H., van Dam G.M., Hoekstra H.J.: “A systematic review and meta-analyses of sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer and melanoma, a plea for tracer mapping”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2016, 42, 466.

[16] Delpech Y., Coutant C., Darai E., Barranger E.: “Sentinel lymph node evaluation in endometrial cancer and the importance of micrometastases”. Surg. Oncol., 2008, 17, 237.

[17] Ballester M., Dubernard G., Lécuru F., Heitz D., Mathevet P., Marret H., et al.: “Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinelnode biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO)”. Lancet Oncol., 2011, 12, 469.

[18] Kadkhodayan S., Shiravani Z., Hasanzadeh M., Sharifi N., Yousefi Z., Fattahi A., Sadeghi R.: “Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer-a feasibility study using cervical injection of radiotracer and blue dye”. Nucl. Med. Rev. Cent. East. Eur., 2014, 17, 55.

[19] Papadia A., Imboden S., Siegenthaler F., Gasparri M.L., Mohr S., Lanz S., Mueller M.D.: “Laparoscopic Indocyanine Green Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2016, 23, 2206

[20] Plante M., Touhami O., Trinh X.B., Renaud M.C., Sebastianelli A., Grondin K., Gregoire J.: “Sentinel node mapping with indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer. A pilot study and review of the literature”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 137, 443.

[21] Desai P.H., Hughes P., Tobias D.H., Tchabo N., Heller P.B., Dise C., Slomovitz B.M.: “Accuracy of robotic sentinel lymph node detection (RSLND) for patients with endometrial cancer (EC)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 135, 196.

[22] Kang S., Yoo H.J., Hwang J.H., Lim M.C., Seo S.S., Park S.Y.: “Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: meta-analysis of 26 studies”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 123, 522.

[23] Hassanzade M., Attaran M., Treglia G., Yousefi Z., Sadeghi R.: “Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 130, 237.

[24] Tehranian S., Treglia G., Krag D.N., Dabbagh Kakhki V.R., Zakavi S.R., Sadeghi R., Keshtgar M.: “Sentinel node mapping in anal canal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis”. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis., 2013, 22, 321.

[25] Yabushita H., Shimazu M., Yamada H., Sawaguchi K., Noguchi M., Nakanishi M., Kawai M.: “Occult lymph node metastases detected by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry predict recurrence in nodenegative endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 80, 139.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top