Article Data

  • Views 493
  • Dowloads 141

Original Research

Open Access

Screening crucial genes involved in triple-negative breast cancer through bioinformatics analysis of microarray data

  • Wen-long Zhang1
  • Wan-ning Wang2
  • Yan-xia Sun1
  • Li-qi Bi3,*,

1Department of Hematology and Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun (China)

2Department of Nephrology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun (China)

3Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun (China)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3843.2018 Vol.39,Issue 1,February 2018 pp.101-107

Published: 10 February 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Li-qi Bi E-mail: biliqiqiqiqi@hotmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is breast cancer with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. TNBC patients have a high risk of distant recurrence and death. This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms of TNBC. Materials and Methods: GSE38959 downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database included 30 TNBC cells and 13 normal mammary gland ductal cells. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using limma package in a bioconductor and then annotated. Using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) tool, their functions were predicted through enrichment analysis. After the protein-protein interaction (PPI) interactions were searched using STRING database, PPI network and modules were constructed by Cytoscape software. Results: A total of 2,039 DEGs were identified in TNBC cells. Among the upregulated genes, there were 36 TFs and 78 TAGs. Among the downregulated genes, a total of 46 TFs and 89 TAGs were annotated. Three significant modules were identified from the PPI network for the DEGs. Enrichment analysis showed that CCNB1, CDK1, PLK1, BUB1, and BUB1B were enriched in cell cycle, meanwhile, PSMD4 was enriched in the proteasome pathway. Genes might also function in TNBC through interacting with others (e.g. CDK1-CCNB1, PSMD14-UCHL5, BUB1-PLK1, and BUB1-BUB1B). Conclusion: In conclusion, CDK1 and CCNB1 were the key genes involved in the proliferation and apoptosis of TNBC cells. BUB1, BUBR1, and PLK1 might play crucial roles in the chromosomal instability in TNBC development. The interaction between UCHL5 and PSMD14 might be the pivotal mechanism in the degradation of ER in TNBC.

Keywords

Triple-negative breast cancer; Differentially expressed genes; Enrichment analysis; Protein-protein interaction network.

Cite and Share

Wen-long Zhang,Wan-ning Wang,Yan-xia Sun,Li-qi Bi. Screening crucial genes involved in triple-negative breast cancer through bioinformatics analysis of microarray data. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(1);101-107.

References

[1] Lv M., Li B., Li Y., Mao X., Yao F., Jin F.: “Predictive role of molecular subtypes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients in Northeast China”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2011, 12, 2411.

[2] Carey L., Winer E., Viale G., Cameron D., Gianni L.: “Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?” Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 2010, 7, 683.

[3] Mosalpuria K., Hall C., Krishnamurthy S., Lodhi A., Hallman D.M., Baraniuk M.S., et al.: “Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients”. Mol. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 2, 845.

[4] Brady-West D.C., McGrowder D.A.: “Triple negative breast cancer: therapeutic and prognostic implications”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2011, 12, 2139.

[5] Dent R., Trudeau M., Pritchard K.I., Hanna W.M., Kahn H.K., Sawka C.A., et al.: “Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2007, 13, 4429.

[6] Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V.: “Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry”. Cancer, 2007, 109, 1721.

[7] Oakman C, Viale G, Di Leo A.: “Management of triple negative breast cancer”. Breast, 2010, 19, 312.

[8] Verlinden L, Bempt IV, Eelen G, Drijkoningen M, Verlinden I, Marchal K, et al.: “The E2F-Regulated Gene Chk1 Is Highly Expressed in Triple-Negative Estrogen Receptor−/Progesterone Receptor−/ HER-2− Breast Carcinomas”. Cancer Res., 2007, 67, 6574.

[9] Do K., Chen A.P.: “Molecular pathways: Targeting PARP in cancer treatment”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2013, 19, 977.

[10] Tun N.M., Villani G., Ong K., Yoe L., Bo Z.M.: “Risk of having BRCA1 mutation in high-risk women with triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis”. Clin. Genet., 2014, 85, 43.

[11] Komatsu M., Yoshimaru T., Matsuo T., Kiyotani K., Miyoshi Y., Tanahashi T., et al.: “Molecular features of triple negative breast cancer cells by genome-wide gene expression profiling analysis”. Int. J. Oncol., 2013, 42, 478.

[12] Diboun I., Wernisch L., Orengo C.A., Koltzenburg M.: “Microarray analysis after RNA amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma”. BMC Genomics, 2006, 7, 252.

[13] Matys V., Fricke E., Geffers R., Gößling E., Haubrock M., Hehl R., et al.: “TRANSFAC®: transcriptional regulation, from patterns to profiles”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31, 374.

[14] Zhao M., Sun J., Zhao Z.: “TSGene: a web resource for tumor suppressor genes”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2013, 41, D970.

[15] Chen J.S., Hung W.S., Chan H.H., Tsai S.J., Sun H.S.: “In silico identification of oncogenic potential of fyn-related kinase in hepatocellular carcinoma”. Bioinformatics, 2013, 29, 420.

[16] Arakawa K., Kono N., Yamada Y., Mori H., Tomita M.: “KEGGbased pathway visualization tool for complex omics data”. In Silico Biol., 2005, 5, 419.

[17] Hulsegge I., Kommadath A., Smits M.A.: “Globaltest and GOEAST: two different approaches for Gene Ontology analysis”. BMC Proc., 2009, 3, S10.

[18] Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A.: “Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources”. Nat Protoc, 2009, 4, 44.

[19] Franceschini A., Szklarczyk D., Frankild S., Kuhn M., Simonovic M., Roth A., et al.: “STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration”. Nucleic Acids Res., 2012, 41, D808.

[20] Kohl M., Wiese S., Warscheid B.: “Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks”. Methods Mol. Biol., 2011, 696, 291.

[21] Lee M.H., Yang H.Y.: “Regulators of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases and cancers”. Cancer Metastasis Rev., 2003, 22, 435.

[22] Kourea H.P., Koutras A.K., Scopa C.D., Marangos M.N., Tzoracoeleftherakis E., Koukouras D., et al.: “Expression of the cell cycle regulatory proteins p34cdc2, p21waf1, and p53 in node negative invasive ductal breast carcinoma”. Mol. Pathol., 2003, 56, 328.

[23] Moroy T, Geisen C. “Cyclin E”. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 2004, 36, 1424.

[24] Sutherland R.L., Musgrove E.A.: “Cyclins and breast cancer”. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 2004, 9, 95.

[25] Chae S.W., Sohn J.H., Kim D.H., Choi Y.J., Park Y.L., Kim K., et al.: “Overexpressions of Cyclin B1, cdc2, p16 and p53 in human breast cancer: the clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic implications”. Yonsei Med. J., 2011, 52, 445.

[26] Abaza M.S.I., Bahman A-M.A., Al-Attiyah R.J.: “Roscovitine synergizes with conventional chemo-therapeutic drugs to induce efficient apoptosis of human colorectal cancer cells”. World J. Gastroenterol., 2008, 14, 5162.

[27] Appleyard M.V.C., O’Neill M.A., Murray K.E., Paulin F.E., Bray S.E., Kernohan N.M., et al.: “Seliciclib (CYC202, Rroscovitine) enhances the antitumor effect of doxorubicin in vivo in a breast cancer xenograft model”. Int. J. Cancer, 2009, 124, 465.

[28] Horiuchi D., Kusdra L., Huskey N.E., Chandriani S., Lenburg M.E., Gonzalez-Angulo A.M., et al.: “MYC pathway activation in triplenegative breast cancer is synthetic lethal with CDK inhibition”. J. Exp. Med., 2012, 209, 679.

[29] Meyer N., Penn L.Z.: “Reflecting on 25 years with MYC”. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2008, 8, 976.

[30] Liu Y., Zhu Y-H., Mao C-Q., Dou S., Shen S., Tan Z-B., et al.: “Triple negative breast cancer therapy with CDK1 siRNA delivered by cationic lipid assisted PEG-PLA nanoparticles”. J. Controlled Release, 2014, 192, 114-21.

[31] Pandey J.P., Kistner-Griffin E., Namboodiri A.M., Iwasaki M., Kasuga Y., Hamada G.S., et al.: “Higher levels of antibodies to the tumor-associated antigen cyclin B1 in cancer-free individuals than in patients with breast cancer”. Clin. Exp. Immunol., 2014, 178, 75

[32] Yin X-Y., Grove L., Datta N.S., Katula K., Long M.W., Prochownik E.V.: “Inverse regulation of cyclin B1 by c-Myc and p53 and induction of tetraploidy by cyclin B1 overexpression”. Cancer Res., 2001, 61, 6487.

[33] Molinari M.: “Cell cycle checkpoints and their inactivation in human cancer”. Cell Prolif., 2000, 33, 261.

[34] Williams G.L., Roberts T.M., Gjoerup O.V.: “Bub1: escapades in a cellular world”. Cell Cycle, 2007, 6, 1699.

[35] Bolanos-Garcia V.M., Blundell T.L.: “BUB1 and BUBR1: multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle”. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2011, 36, 141.

[36] Yuan B., Xu Y., Woo J.H., Wang Y., Bae Y.K., Yoon D.S., et al.: “Increased expression of mitotic checkpoint genes in breast cancer cells with chromosomal instability”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2006, 12, 405.

[37] Izumi H., Matsumoto Y., Ikeuchi T., Saya H., Kajii T., Matsuura S.: “BubR1 localizes to centrosomes and suppresses centrosome amplification via regulating Plk1 activity in interphase cells”. Oncogene, 2009, 28, 2806.

[38] Lingle W.L., Barrett S.L., Negron V.C., D’Assoro A.B., Boeneman K., Liu W., et al.: “Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 2002, 99, 1978.

[39] Nawaz Z., Lonard D.M., Dennis A.P., Smith C.L., O’Malley B.W.: “Proteasome-dependent degradation of the human estrogen receptor”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 1999, 96, 1858.

[40] Tateishi Y., Kawabe Y., Chiba T., Murata S., Ichikawa K., Murayama A., et al.: “Ligand-dependent switching of ubiquitin-proteasome pathways for estrogen receptor”. EMBO J., 2004, 23, 4813.

[41] Balan K.V., Wang Y., Chen S.W., Pantazis P., Wyche J.H., Han Z.: “Down-regulation of estrogen receptor-alpha in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells after proteasome inhibition”. Biochem. Pharmacol., 2006, 72, 566.

[42] Lonard D.M., Nawaz Z., Smith C.L., O’Malley B.W.: “The 26S proteasome is required for estrogen receptor-alpha and coactivator turnover and for efficient estrogen receptor-alpha transactivation”. Mol. Cell, 2000, 5, 939.

[43] Verma R., Aravind L., Oania R., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R. 3rd, Koonin E.V., et al.: “Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome”. Science, 2002, 298, 611.

[44] Hamazaki J., Iemura S., Natsume T., Yashiroda H., Tanaka K., Murata S.: “A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes”. EMBO J., 2006, 25, 4524-36.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top