Article Data

  • Views 1782
  • Dowloads 153

Original Research

Open Access

Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in completely staged endometrioid type endometrial cancer

  • B. Ozdal1
  • M. Oz1,*,
  • H. Yalcin1
  • L. Sirvan2
  • T. Gungor1
  • M. M. Meydanli1

1Department of Gynecological Oncology,Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Education and Training Hospital, Ankara

2Department of Pathology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Education and Training Hospital, Ankara (Turkey)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3862.2018 Vol.39,Issue 2,April 2018 pp.205-209

Published: 10 April 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Oz E-mail: ozmurat@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: Majority of gynecologic oncologists perform low para-aortic dissection, while only one in ten incorporated para-aortic dissection to the level of renal vessels. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the necessity of para-aortic lymph node dissection (LND) in the surgical management of the endometrioid type endometrial cancer (EC). Materials and Methods: Endometrioid type EC patients who were operated at the present institution were included in the study. The patients were stratified according to the modified Mayo Clinic risk criteria. According to these criteria, the authors identified each patient as low risk or high risk for extra-uterine disease spread on final pathology reports. Low risk criteria for nodal disease were identified as grade 1 or 2 endometrioid type disease, equal or less than 1/2 myometrial invasion (MI), and greatest tumor diameter equal or less than 2 cm. Results: Three hundred eighty-six patients were operated with the diagnosis of endometrioid type EC. Two hundred forty-seven patients had high risk factors for extra-uterine disease; thus, complete surgical staging was performed to this group. The remaining 139 patients had low risk criteria. The median follow-up time was 35 months (minimum two months, maximum 97 months). Twenty-six patients (10.5%) died of disease during the follow-up period. Two hundred fifteen patients (87%) had negative nodes, while remaining 32 (12.6%) patients had pelvic and/or para-aortic LN metastasis. Thirteen patients (40.6%) had only pelvic LN involvement (Stage 3C1), 19 patients (59.4%) had either pelvic and/or para-aortic LN involvement (Stage 3C2), and six patients (18.6%) had isolated para-aortic LN involvement. Conclusion: The present authors advocate the value of para-aortic LND in surgical management of EC, and retroperitoneal LND should not be limited to pelvic nodes, a systematic para-aortic dissection up to left renal vein should be performed for the patients with at least one risk factor for nodal disease.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Nodal spread; Lymph node dissection; Endometrioid type.

Cite and Share

B. Ozdal,M. Oz,H. Yalcin,L. Sirvan,T. Gungor,M. M. Meydanli. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in completely staged endometrioid type endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(2);205-209.

References

[1] Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, Creasman WT, Heller P, Homesley HD, Graham JE.: “Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1991, 40, 55.

[2] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P,. Beller U., Benedet J.L., Heintz A.P., et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri”. J. Epidemiol. Biostat., 2001, 6, 47.

[3] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103.

[4] Soliman P.T., Frumovitz M., Spannuth W., Greer M.J., Sharma S., Schmeler K.M., et al.: “Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 119, 291.

[5] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Gostout B.S., Jones M.B., Wilson T.O., Podratz K.C.: “Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 11.

[6] Chi DS, Barakat RR, Palayekar MJ, Levine DA, Sonoda Y, Alektiar K, et al.: “The incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis by FIGO staging for patients with adequately surgically staged endometrial adenocarcinoma of endometrioid histology”. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2008, 18, 269.

[7] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Keeney G.L., Haddock M.G., Calori G., Podratz K.C.: “Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary?” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 182, 1506.

[8] Cragun J.M., Havrilesky L.J., Calingaert B., Synan I., Secord A.A., Soper J.T., et al.: “Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 23, 3668.

[9] Lutman C.V., Havrilesky L.J., Cragun J.M., Secord A.A., Calingaert B., Berchuck A., et al.: “Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 102, 92.

[10] Chan J.K., Cheung M.K., Huh W.K., Osann K., Husain A., Teng N.N., Kapp D.S.: “Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients”. Cancer, 2006, 107, 1823.

[11] Abu-Rustum N.R., Gomez J.D., Alektiar K.M., Soslow R.A., Hensley M.L., Leitao M.M. Jr., et al.: “The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 115, 236.

[12] Abu-Rustum N.R., Chi D.S., Leitao M., Oke E.A., Hensley M.L., Alektiar K.M., Barakat R.R., et al.: “What is the incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal recurrence in grade 1 endometrial carcinoma?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 46.

[13] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Keeney G.L., Podratz K.C.: “Routes of lymphatic spread: a study of 112 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 81, 100.

[14] Group A.S., Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M.K.: “Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.

[15] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G., et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[16] Uccella S., Podratz K.C., Aletti G.D., Mariani A.: “Re: Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2009, 101, 897.

[17] Naumann RW.: “The role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: was the ASTEC trial doomed by design and are we destined to repeat that mistake?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 126, 5.

[18] Creasman WT, Mutch DE, Herzog TJ.: “ASTEC lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy studies: are conclusions valid?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 116, 293.

[19] Lee T.S., Kim J.W., Seong S.J., Ryu H.S.: “Benefit of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: can the truth be obtained by randomized controlled trial after ASTEC?” Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer,

Submission Turnaround Time

Top