Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Application of diffusion-weighted MRI for endometrial cancer diagnosis
1Department of CT, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
2Depatrment of Radiology, the People’s Hospital of Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
*Corresponding Author(s): T. Nuerlan E-mail: nuerlantuerxun@sina.com
Objective: To investigate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and to verify the feasibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to distinguish normal and endometrial cancer. Material and Methods: There were 24 patients with confirmed endometrial cancer enrolled into this study and underwent preoperative MRI and total hysterectomy. Twenty-two healthy volunteers were included as control. The apparent diffusion coefficient of endometrial cancer and normal endometrium were measured on the apparent diffusion coefficient map of each diffusion-weighted image and compared. The differences among the ADC values of normal endometrium, junctional zone, and endometrium were compared as well. Results: The ADC values of the 22 control groups were as follows: myometrium (1.50±0.08)×10-3 mm 2/s, junctional zone (0.95±0.08)×10-3 mm 2/s, and endometrium (1.33±0.09)×10-3 mm 2/s. The ADC values of endometrial cancer (0.77±0.08)×10-3 mm2/s was much lower than that of normal endometrium (p < 0.001). The mean ADC value for each histologic grade was 0.90±0.11(G1), 0.89±0. 3 (G2), and 0.69±0.09 (G3). The ADC value of grade 3 tumors was significantly lower than that of grade 1 tumors (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference among the ADC between cancer group and healthy individuals. Conclusion: The DW-MRI provides helpful information for evaluation of endometrial cancer.
Apparent diffusion coefficient; Cancer; Diffusion-weighted imaging; MRI; Uterus.
Y. Zhou,L. Jiang,T. Nuerlan. Application of diffusion-weighted MRI for endometrial cancer diagnosis. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(4);655-658.
[1] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103.
[2] Tamai K., Koyama T., Saga T., Morisawa N., Fujimoto K., Mikami Y., Togashi K.: “The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas”. Eur. Radiol., 2008, 18, 723.
[3] Manfredi R., Gui B., Maresca G., Fanfani F., Bonomo L.: “Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging”. Abdom. Imaging, 2005, 30, 626.
[4] Le Bihan D., Turner R., Douek P., Patronas N.: “Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 1992, 159, 591.
[5] Lin G., Ng K.K., Chang C.J., Wang J.J., Ho K.C., Yen T.C., et al.: “Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging—initial experience”. Radiology, 2009, 250, 784.
[6] Takeuchi M., Matsuzaki K., Nishitani H.: “Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion”. Acta Radiol., 2009, 50, 947.
[7] Fujii S., Matsusue E., Kigawa J., Sato S., Kanasaki Y., Nakanishi J., et al.: “Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results”. Eur. Radiol., 2008, 18, 384.
[8] Rechichi G., Galimberti S., Signorelli M., Perego P., Valsecchi M.G., Sironi S.: “Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 1.5-T”. Eur. Radiol., 2010, 20, 754.
[9] Tamai K., Koyama T., Saga T., Umeoka S., Mikami Y., Fujii S., Togashi K.: “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2007, 26, 682.
[10] Shen S.H., Chiou Y.Y., Wang J.H., Yen M.S., Lee R.C., Lai C.R., Chang C.Y.: “Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 2008, 190, 481.
[11] Tsushima Y., Takano A., Taketomi-Takahashi A., Endo K.: “Body diffusion- weighted MR imaging using high b-value for malignant tumor screening: usefulness and necessity of referring to T2-weighted images and creating fusion images”. Acad. Radiol., 2007, 14, 643.
[12] Kwee T.C., Takahara T., Ochiai R., Katahira K., Van Cauteren M., Imai Y., et al.: “Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2009, 70, 409.
[13] Sugahara T., Korogi Y., Kochi M., Ikushima I., Shigematu Y., Hirai T., et al.: “Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1999, 9, 53.
[14] Rumboldt Z., Camacho D.L., Lake D., Welsh C.T., Castillo M.: “Apparent diffusion coefficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children”. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 2006, 27, 1362.
[15] Hayashida Y., Hirai T., Morishita S., Kitajima M., Murakami R., Korogi Y., et al.: “Diffusion-weighted imaging of metastatic brain tumors: comparison with histologic type and tumor cellularity”. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 2006, 27, 1419.
[16] Patterson D.M., Padhani A.R., Collins D.J.: “Technology insight: water diffusion MRI—a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy”. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol., 2008, 5, 220.
[17] Inada Y., Matsuki M., Nakai G., Tatsugami F., Tanikake M., Narabayashi I., et al.: “Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging?” Eur. J. Radiol., 2009, 70, 122.
[18] Kilickesmez O., Bayramoglu S., Inci E., Cimilli T., Kayhan A.: “Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones”. Acta Radiol., 2009, 50, 340.
Top