Article Data

  • Views 577
  • Dowloads 132

Original Research

Open Access

Application of diffusion-weighted MRI for endometrial cancer diagnosis

  • Y. Zhou1
  • L. Jiang2
  • T. Nuerlan1,*,

1Department of CT, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

2Depatrment of Radiology, the People’s Hospital of Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3867.2018 Vol.39,Issue 4,August 2018 pp.655-658

Published: 10 August 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): T. Nuerlan E-mail: nuerlantuerxun@sina.com

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and to verify the feasibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to distinguish normal and endometrial cancer. Material and Methods: There were 24 patients with confirmed endometrial cancer enrolled into this study and underwent preoperative MRI and total hysterectomy. Twenty-two healthy volunteers were included as control. The apparent diffusion coefficient of endometrial cancer and normal endometrium were measured on the apparent diffusion coefficient map of each diffusion-weighted image and compared. The differences among the ADC values of normal endometrium, junctional zone, and endometrium were compared as well. Results: The ADC values of the 22 control groups were as follows: myometrium (1.50±0.08)×10-3 mm 2/s, junctional zone (0.95±0.08)×10-3 mm 2/s, and endometrium (1.33±0.09)×10-3 mm 2/s. The ADC values of endometrial cancer (0.77±0.08)×10-3 mm2/s was much lower than that of normal endometrium (p < 0.001). The mean ADC value for each histologic grade was 0.90±0.11(G1), 0.89±0. 3 (G2), and 0.69±0.09 (G3). The ADC value of grade 3 tumors was significantly lower than that of grade 1 tumors (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference among the ADC between cancer group and healthy individuals. Conclusion: The DW-MRI provides helpful information for evaluation of endometrial cancer.


Keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Cancer; Diffusion-weighted imaging; MRI; Uterus.

Cite and Share

Y. Zhou,L. Jiang,T. Nuerlan. Application of diffusion-weighted MRI for endometrial cancer diagnosis. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(4);655-658.

References

[1] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103.

[2] Tamai K., Koyama T., Saga T., Morisawa N., Fujimoto K., Mikami Y., Togashi K.: “The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas”. Eur. Radiol., 2008, 18, 723.

[3] Manfredi R., Gui B., Maresca G., Fanfani F., Bonomo L.: “Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging”. Abdom. Imaging, 2005, 30, 626.

[4] Le Bihan D., Turner R., Douek P., Patronas N.: “Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 1992, 159, 591.

[5] Lin G., Ng K.K., Chang C.J., Wang J.J., Ho K.C., Yen T.C., et al.: “Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging—initial experience”. Radiology, 2009, 250, 784.

[6] Takeuchi M., Matsuzaki K., Nishitani H.: “Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion”. Acta Radiol., 2009, 50, 947.

[7] Fujii S., Matsusue E., Kigawa J., Sato S., Kanasaki Y., Nakanishi J., et al.: “Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results”. Eur. Radiol., 2008, 18, 384.

[8] Rechichi G., Galimberti S., Signorelli M., Perego P., Valsecchi M.G., Sironi S.: “Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 1.5-T”. Eur. Radiol., 2010, 20, 754.

[9] Tamai K., Koyama T., Saga T., Umeoka S., Mikami Y., Fujii S., Togashi K.: “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2007, 26, 682.

[10] Shen S.H., Chiou Y.Y., Wang J.H., Yen M.S., Lee R.C., Lai C.R., Chang C.Y.: “Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 2008, 190, 481.

[11] Tsushima Y., Takano A., Taketomi-Takahashi A., Endo K.: “Body diffusion- weighted MR imaging using high b-value for malignant tumor screening: usefulness and necessity of referring to T2-weighted images and creating fusion images”. Acad. Radiol., 2007, 14, 643.

[12] Kwee T.C., Takahara T., Ochiai R., Katahira K., Van Cauteren M., Imai Y., et al.: “Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2009, 70, 409.

[13] Sugahara T., Korogi Y., Kochi M., Ikushima I., Shigematu Y., Hirai T., et al.: “Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1999, 9, 53.

[14] Rumboldt Z., Camacho D.L., Lake D., Welsh C.T., Castillo M.: “Apparent diffusion coefficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children”. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 2006, 27, 1362.

[15] Hayashida Y., Hirai T., Morishita S., Kitajima M., Murakami R., Korogi Y., et al.: “Diffusion-weighted imaging of metastatic brain tumors: comparison with histologic type and tumor cellularity”. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 2006, 27, 1419.

[16] Patterson D.M., Padhani A.R., Collins D.J.: “Technology insight: water diffusion MRI—a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy”. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol., 2008, 5, 220.

[17] Inada Y., Matsuki M., Nakai G., Tatsugami F., Tanikake M., Narabayashi I., et al.: “Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging?” Eur. J. Radiol., 2009, 70, 122.

[18] Kilickesmez O., Bayramoglu S., Inci E., Cimilli T., Kayhan A.: “Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones”. Acta Radiol., 2009, 50, 340.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top