Article Data

  • Views 508
  • Dowloads 127

Original Research

Open Access

Impact of age on the quality of care in endometrial cancer: a retrospective study of 145 patients

  • B. Ripamonti1,*,
  • C.R. Lacoste1
  • O. Le Saux2
  • T. Raia-Barjat1,3
  • C. Chauleur1,3

1Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France

2Service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France

3EA 3065, groupe de recherche sur la thrombose, Université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Étienne cedex, France

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3923.2018 Vol.39,Issue 3,June 2018 pp.408-414

Published: 10 June 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): B. Ripamonti E-mail: bertripa@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer and affects mostly the elderly. Advanced age is a poor prognostic factor but reasons are numerous and controversial. The objective of this study was to characterize the effect of age on endometrial cancer patients medical care. Materials and Methods: It was a descriptive and comparative study of a retrospective cohort of 145 patients having received care for endometrial cancer during ten years in the Gynecological Department of Saint-Etienne Hospital. The 145 patients studied were subdivided into three groups according to their age at diagnosis: < 70 (group 1), 70-79 (group 2), and > 80 (group 3). The data collected were: clinical characteristics; preoperative, operating and pathological data, and postoperative care. For each patient, the authors evaluated compliance to patient management guidelines. Results: Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common reason of first consultation and incidental diagnoses were more frequent in group 2 (13.8%). Concerning FIGO staging, there was an over-representation of Stages III and IV in group 1, while the distribution was more in favor of Stages I and II for older patients groups. No para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in patients from group 3 despite seven theoretical indications. This non-compliance to guidelines was detected in two-thirds of patients in group 3. Conclusion: Elderly patients from the present cohort showed less aggressive and advanced tumors compared to younger patients. Yet, they did not receive optimal surgical and adjuvant therapy according to guidelines. A multidisciplinary evaluation using standardized assessment is needed in order to help physicians in the decision-making process.

Keywords

Elderly patients; Gynecologic oncology; Endometrial cancer.

Cite and Share

B. Ripamonti,C.R. Lacoste,O. Le Saux,T. Raia-Barjat,C. Chauleur. Impact of age on the quality of care in endometrial cancer: a retrospective study of 145 patients. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(3);408-414.

References

[1] Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A.: “Global cancer statistics, 2012”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2015, 65, 87.

[2] Yancik R., Ries L.A.G.: “Cancer in older persons: an international issue in an aging world”. Semin. Oncol., 2004, 31, 128.

[3] Kosary C.L.: “FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina”. Semin. Surg. Oncol., 1994, 10, 31.

[4] Zaino R.J., Kurman R.J., Diana K.L., Morrow C.P.: “Pathologic models to predict outcome for women with endometrial adenocarcinoma: the importance of the distinction between surgical stage and clinical stage—a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Cancer, 1996, 77, 1115.

[5] Ahmed A., Zamba G., DeGeest K., Lynch C.F.: “The impact of surgery on survival of elderly women with endometrial cancer in the SEER program from 1992-2002”. Gynecol Oncol., 2008, 111, 35.

[6] Alektiar K.M., Venkatraman E., Abu-Rustum N., Barakat R.R.: “Is endometrial carcinoma intrinsically more aggressive in elderly patients?” Cancer, 2003, 98, 2368.

[7] Farley J.H., Nycum L.R., Birrer M.J., Park R.C., Taylor R.R.: “Agespecific survival of women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus”. Gynecol Oncol., 2000, 79, 86.

[8] Lee E-J., Kim T-J., Choi C.H., Lee J-W., Lee J-H., Bae D-S., et al.: Uterine endometrial carcinoma: 10 years’ experience with long-term follow-up at a single Korean institution”. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., 2012, 74, 313.

[9] Labastida R., Dexeus S., Fábregas R., Tresserra F., Fernández A.: “Endometrial cancer: factors affecting survival”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2003, 24, 381.

[10] Truong P.T., Kader H.A., Lacy B., Lesperance M., MacNeil M.V., Berthelet E., et al.: “The effects of age and comorbidity on treatment and outcomes in women with endometrial cancer”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 28, 157.

[11] Ouldamer L., Duquesne M., Arbion F., Barillot I., Marret H., Body G.: “The impact of therapeutic management on survival of elderly women with endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil., 2012, 40, 759. [Article in French]

[12] Okuma K., Yamashita H., Kawana K., Nakagawa S., Oda K., Nakagawa K.: “Advanced age is a significant determinant of poor prognosis in patients treated with surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy for endometrial cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2010, 36, 757.

[13] Fleming N.D., Lentz S.E., Cass I., Li A.J., Karlan B.Y., Walsh C.S.: “Is older age a poor prognostic factor in stage I and II endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 120, 189.

[14] Bittoni M.A., Fisher J.L., Fowler J.M., Maxwell G.L., Paskett E.D.: “Assessment of the effects of severe obesity and lifestyle risk factors on stage of endometrial cancer”. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 2013, 22, 76.

[15] Setiawan V.W., Yang H.P., Pike M.C., McCann S.E., Yu H., Xiang YB., et al.: “Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors?” J. Clin. Oncol., 2013, 31, 2607.

[16] Luber K.M., Boero S., Choe J.Y.: “The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2001, 184, 1496.

[17] Denschlag D., Ulrich U., Emons G.: “The diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer: progress and controversies”. Dtsch. Ärztebl. Int., 2010, 108, 571.

[18] Kumar S., Shah J.P., Bryant C.S., Seward S., Ali-Fehmi R., Morris R.T., et al.: “Radiation-associated endometrial cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 113, 319.

[19] Gayar O.H., Robbins J.R., Parikh K., Lu M., Buekers T., Munkarah A., et al.: “Hysterectomy for uterine adenocarcinoma in the elderly: tumor characteristics, and long-term outcome”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 123, 71.

[20] Lachance J.A., Everett E.N., Greer B., Mandel L., Swisher E., Tamimi H., et al.: “The effect of age on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 101, 470.

[21] Lindahl B., Ranstam J., Willén R.: “Five year survival rate in endometrial carcinoma stages I—II: influence of degree of tumour differentiation, age, myometrial invasion and DNA content”. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1994, 101, 621.

[22] Coronado P.J., Herraiz M.A., Magrina J.F., Fasero M., Vidart J.A.: “Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2012, 165, 289.

[23] Santi A., Kuhn A., Gyr T., Eberhard M., Johann S., Günthert A.R., et al.: “Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A comparison of 240 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer”. Surg. Endosc., 2010, 24, 939.

[24] Hauspy J., Jiménez W., Rosen B., Gotlieb W.H., Fung-Kee-Fung M., Plante M.: “Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a review”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can., 2010, 32, 570.

[25] Leitao M.M.: “Current and future surgical approaches in the management of endometrial carcinoma”. Future Oncol. Lond. Engl., 2008, 4, 389.

[26] Walker J.L., Piedmonte M.R., Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Mannel R.S., et al.: “Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 5331.

[27] Malinowski A., Majchrzak-Baczmańska D., Pogoda K., Maciołek- Blewniewska G., Antosiak B.: “Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers”. Ginekol. Pol., 2013, 84, 197.

[28] Huang C-Y., Ho C-M., Chen Y-L., You S-L., Chen C-A., Cheng WF.: “Impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine endometrioid carcinoma”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2013, 39, 350.

[29] O’Hanlan K.A., Pinto R.A., O’Holleran M.: “Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without lymph node dissection for uterine neoplasia”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2007, 14, 449.

[30] Cormier B., Sauthier P., Lussier C., Zang G., Mayrand M-H.: “Determinants of lymph node count in endometrial cancer surgical staging”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2012, 22, 1361.

[31] Aletti G.D., Dowdy S.C., Podratz K.C., Cliby W.A.: “Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2007, 197, 676.e1.

[32] Nout R.A., van de Poll-Franse L.V., Lybeert M.L.M., Wárlám-Rodenhuis C.C., Jobsen J.J., Mens J.W.M., et al.: “Long-term outcome and quality of life of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated with or without pelvic radiotherapy in the post operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma 1 (PORTEC-1) trial”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 29, 1692.

[33] Perri T., Katz T., Korach J., Beiner M.E., Jakobson-Setton A., Ben- Baruch G.: “Treating gynecologic malignancies in elderly patients”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 38, 278.

[34] Balducci L., Extermann M.: “Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach”. Oncologist, 2000, 5, 224.

[35] Pope D., Ramesh H., Gennari R., Corsini G., Maffezzini M., Hoekstra H.J., et al.: “Pre-operative assessment of cancer in the elderly (PACE): a comprehensive assessment of underlying characteristics of elderly cancer patients prior to elective surgery”. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 15, 189

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top