Article Data

  • Views 542
  • Dowloads 107

Original Research

Open Access

Is adjuvant treatment in early-stage uterine sarcomas beneficial?

  • C. M. Sepúlveda-Rivera1,†
  • S. A. Barquet-Muñoz2,†
  • C. Pérez-Plascencia3
  • R. Salcedo-Hernández2
  • A. M. Ruiz-Beltrán1
  • D. Cantú de León1,*,

1Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México (INCan), Mexico City (Mexico)

2Department of Gynecologic Oncology, INCan, Mexico City

3 3Department of Basic Research, INCan, Mexico City (Mexico)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4020.2018 Vol.39,Issue 3,June 2018 pp.443-447

Published: 10 June 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): D. Cantú de León E-mail: 'dcantude@gmail.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free period (DFP) in patients with uterine sarcomas (US) in early stages with and without adjuvant treatment. Materials and Methods: One hundred sixteen clinical files with a diagnosis of US were reviewed. These were distributed into two groups: those who received adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy (CT) and/or radiotherapy (RT), and those who did not. Chi-square test was utilized for qualitative and the Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative variables. OS and the DFP were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: Forty-seven patients were identified with clinical Stages I and II, of whom 25 patients (53.1%) received adjuvant treatment and 22 (46.8%) did not. Of the first group, 18 (72%) were treated with RT and 12 (48%) received CT. Five-year OS in patients who received adjuvant treatment was 68.05% (CI: 41.27–84.58) in comparison with those who did not, which was 78.41% (CI: 51.99–91.36, p = 0.41). Five-year DFP in the group that received adjuvant treatment was 46.88% (95% CI, 25.21–65.94), and in the group that did not it was 52.89% (95% CI, 30.00–71.39, p = 0.56). Conclusion: In early stage US, the benefit in OS and DFP using adjuvant management is limited, therefore, it has to be offered cautiously or not offered to this particular group of patients. Larger number of patients needs to be evaluated and collaborative phase III trial conducted in order to establish the role of adjuvant CT or RT for these neoplasms.

Keywords

Sarcomas; Uterine neoplasm; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Adjuvant; Cytoreduction.

Cite and Share

C. M. Sepúlveda-Rivera,S. A. Barquet-Muñoz,C. Pérez-Plascencia,R. Salcedo-Hernández,A. M. Ruiz-Beltrán,D. Cantú de León. Is adjuvant treatment in early-stage uterine sarcomas beneficial?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(3);443-447.

References

[1] Cantú de León D., González H., Pérez-Montiel D., Coronel J., Pérez- Plasencia C., Villavicencio-Valencia V., et al.: “Uterine sarcomas: review of 26 years at The Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia of Mexico”. In.t J. Surg., 2013, 11, 518.

[2] Cárdenas Serrano O.E.: “Diagnóstico de sarcoma uterino, revisión de

11 casos”. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex., 2015, 83, 515. Available at: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/ginobsmex/gom2015/gom159b.pdf

[3] El-Khalfaoui K., du Bois A., Heitz F., Kurzeder C., Sehouli, J., Harter P.: “Current and future options in the management and treatment of uterine sarcoma”. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol., 2014, 6, 21.

[4] Tropé C.G, Abeler V.A., Kristensen G.B.: “Diagnosis and treatment of sarcoma of the uterus. A review”. Acta Oncol., 2012, 51, 694. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/

0284186X.2012.689111

[5] Mangionib C., Malmströmc H., Scarfoned G.: “Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study. Eur. J. Cancer, 2008, 44, 6, Pages 808–818Available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0959804908000580/1-s2.0-S0959804908000580-main.pdf?_tid=70e14b6c-fc12-11e5-a25a-00000aacb35f&acdnat=1459959363_15fce5ebfbeb987872bc6f93ca22d4e2

[6] Greer B.E.: “NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology; Uterine Neoplasms”. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA: Cancer Care Alliance. Version I.2014. Available at: https://www.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/gynecological/english/uterine.pdf

[7] Reichardt P.: “The treatment of uterine sarcomas”. Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Sarcoma Center Berlin-Brandenburg, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany. Ann. Oncol., 2012, 23,

151. Available at: http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/suppl_10/x151.full

[8] Martee L., Hensley M.D.: “Adjuvant therapy for high-grade, uteruslimited leiomyosarcoma”. Cancer, 2013, 119, 1555. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.27942/pdf

[9] Sorbe B.: “Radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment of uterine sarcomas”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1985, 20, 281. Available at: h t t p : / / a c . e l s - c d n . c o m / 0 0 9 0 8 2 5 8 8 5 9 0 2 0 9 4 / 1 - s 2 . 0 -0090825885902094-main.pdf?_tid=764aca48-fc16-11e5-81a0-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1459961090_2dffb85b830b4b90e57a0aa1e2bbafe0

[10] Ramondetta L.M., Bodurka D.C., Deavers M.T., Jhingran A.: “Uterine sarcomas”. Available at: http://eknygos.lsmuni.lt/springer/179/ 125-147.pdf

[11] D’Angelo E., Jaime Prat J.: “Uterine sarcomas: a review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 116, 131.

[12] Mancari R., Signorelli M.: Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I-II uterine leiomyosarcoma: a multicentric retrospective study of 140 patients. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 133, 531.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top