Article Data

  • Views 538
  • Dowloads 142

Reviews

Open Access

Pelvic nerve injury during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: key anatomical zone

  • V. Balaya1,2,3,*,
  • R. Douard2,3,4
  • JF. Uhl2,3
  • L. Rossi1,3
  • C. Cornou1,3
  • C. Ngo1,3
  • C. Bensaid1
  • F. Guimiot5
  • AS. Bats1,3
  • V. Delmas2,3,5
  • F. Lecuru1,3

1Service de Chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Paris, France

2URDIA Anatomie EA 4465, Paris, France

3Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de médecine, Paris, France

4Service de Chirurgie générale, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Paris, France

5Service de foetopathologie, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4103.2017 Vol.38,Issue 5,October 2017 pp.657-666

Published: 10 October 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): V. Balaya E-mail: vbalaya@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: To precise key-points of surgical neuroanatomy of the female pelvis to improve nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (RH). Material and Methods: Review of the literature, computer-assisted anatomical dissection, and classic dissection of a female cadaver. Results: The superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) divides into two hypogastric nerves (HN). HN run postero-medially to the ureter and in the lateral part of the uterosacral ligament until the superior angle of the inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP). Pelvic splanchnic nerves (PSN) emerge from ventral rami of S2-S4 and join the posterior edge of the IHP. IHP passes lateral to the cervix and the vaginal fornix. Conclusions: Preservation of SHP necessitates an approach on the right side of the aorta and a blunt dissection of the promontory before lomboaortic lymphadenectomy. To preserve HN, only the medial part of the uterosacral ligament should be resected. The middle rectal artery, the deep uterine vein, and the ureter should be identified to preserve PSN and IHP during resection of paracervix.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Nerve-sparing; Radical hysterectomy; Pelvic female anatomy; Inferior hypogastric plexus.

Cite and Share

V. Balaya,R. Douard,JF. Uhl,L. Rossi,C. Cornou,C. Ngo,C. Bensaid,F. Guimiot,AS. Bats,V. Delmas, F. Lecuru. Pelvic nerve injury during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: key anatomical zone. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(5);657-666.

References

[1] Rob L., Halaska M., Robova H.: “Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical cancer”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 292.

[2] Chen C., Huang L., Liu P., Su G., Li W., Lu L., et al.: “Neurovascular quantitative study of the uterosacral ligament related to nervesparing radical hysterectomy”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2014, 172, 74.

[3] Dursun P., Ayhan A., Kuscu E.: “Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma”. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 2009, 70, 195.

[4] Piver M.S., Rutledge F., Smith J.P.: “Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1974, 44, 265.

[5] Querleu D., Morrow C.P.: “Classification of radical hysterectomy”. Lancet Oncol., 2008, 9, 297.

[6] Raspagliesi F., Ditto A., Hanozet F., Martinelli F., Solima E., Zanaboni F., et al.: “Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: evolution of concepts”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, S119.

[7] Laterza R.M., Sievert K.D., de Ridder D., Vierhout M.E., Haab F., Cardozo L., et al.: “Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer”. Neurourol. Urodyn., 2015, 34, 309.

[8] Magrina J.F., Pawlina W., Kho R.M., Magtibay P.M.: “Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 121, 605.

[9] Maas C.P., Trimbos J.B., DeRuiter M.C., van de Velde C.J.H., Kenter G.G.: “Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective”. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 2003, 48, 271.

[10] Zullo M.A., Manci N., Angioli R., Muzii L., Panici P.B.: “Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review”. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 2003, 48, 287.

[11] Possover M., Stöber S., Plaul K., Schneider A.: “Identification and Preservation of the Motoric Innervation of the Bladder in Radical Hysterectomy Type III”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 79, 154.

[12] Benedetti-Panici P., Zullo M.A., Plotti F., Manci N., Muzii L., Angioli R.: “Long-term bladder function in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type 3-4 radical hysterectomy”. Cancer, 2004, 100, 2110.

[13] Chen G-D., Lin L-Y., Wang P-H., Lee H-S.: “Urinary tract dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 85, 292.

[14] Liang Z., Chen Y., Xu H., Li Y., Wang D.: “Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 119, 202.

[15] Raspagliesi F., Ditto A., Fontanelli R., Solima E., Hanozet F., Zanaboni F., et al.: “Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 93, 307.

[16] Gil-Ibáñez B., Díaz-Feijoo B., Pérez-Benavente A., Puig-Puig O., Franco-Camps S., Centeno C., et al.: “Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results”. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. MRCAS, 2013, 9, 339.

[17] Ercoli A., Delmas V., Gadonneix P., Fanfani F., Villet R., Paparella P., et al.: “Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves”. Surg. Radiol. Anat. SRA, 2003, 25, 200.

[18] Axelsen S.M., Bek K.M., Petersen L.K.: “Urodynamic and ultrasound characteristics of incontinence after radical hysterectomy”. Neurourol. Urodyn., 2007, 26, 794.

[19] Yamaguchi K., Kobayashi M., Kato T., Akita K.: “Origins and distribution of nerves to the female urinary bladder: New anatomical findings in the sex differences”. Clin. Anat., 2011, 24, 880.

[20] Landi S., Ceccaroni M., Perutelli A., Allodi C., Barbieri F., Fiaccavento A., et al.: “Laparoscopic nerve-sparing complete excision of deep endometriosis: is it feasible?” Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl., 2006, 21, 774.

[21] Höckel M., Konerding M.A., Heussel C.P.: “Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 178, 971.

[22] Fujii S.: “Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, S33.

[23] Mauroy B., Demondion X., Bizet B., Claret A., Mestdagh P., Hurt C.: “The female inferior hypogastric (= pelvic) plexus: anatomical and radiological description of the plexus and its afferences—applications to pelvic surgery”. Surg. Radiol. Anat. SRA., 2007, 29, 55.

[24] Mauroy B., Bizet B., Bonnal J.L., Crombet T., Duburcq T., Hurt C.: “Systematization of the vesical and uterovaginal efferences of the female inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic): applications to pelvic surgery on women patients”. Surg. Radiol. Anat. SRA., 2007, 29, 209.

[25] Paraskevas G., Tsitsopoulos P., Papaziogas B., Natsis K., Martoglou S., Stoltidou A., et al.: “Variability in superior hypogastric plexus morphology and its clinical applications: a cadaveric study”. Surg. Radiol. Anat. SRA., 2008, 30, 481.

[26] Hounnou G-M., Uhl J-F., Plaisant O., Delmas V.: “Morphometry by computerized three-dimensional reconstruction of the hypogastric plexus of a human fetus”. Surg. Radiol. Anat. SRA., 2003, 25, 21.

[27] Moszkowicz D., Alsaid B., Bessede T., Penna C., Benoit G., Peschaud F.: “Female pelvic autonomic neuroanatomy based on conventional macroscopic and computer-assisted anatomic dissections”. Surg. Radiol. Anat. SRA, 2011, 33, 397.

[28] Kavallaris A., Hornemann A., Chalvatzas N., Luedders D., Diedrich K., Bohlmann M.K.: “Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: description of the technique and patients’ outcome”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 119, 198.

[29] Hoffman M.S.: “Extent of radical hysterectomy: evolving emphasis”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 94, 1.

[30] Yabuki Y., Asamoto A., Hoshiba T., Nishimoto H., Nishikawa Y., Nakajima T.: “Radical hysterectomy: An anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 77, 155.

[31] Ramanah R., Parratte B., Hubert N., Arbez-Gindre F., Maillet R., Riethmuller D.: “Anatomical and histological study of the uterosacral ligament: practical surgical consequences”. J Gynecol.Obstet. Biol. Reprod., 2009, 38, 304.

[32] Desai R., Puntambekar S.P., Lawande A., Kenawadekar R., Joshi S., Joshi G.A., et al.: “More with LESS: a novel report of nerve sparing radical hysterectomy performed using LESS”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2013, 20, 886.

[33] Fujii M., Sagae S., Sato T., Tsugane M., Murakami G., Kudo R.: “Investigation of the localization of nerves in the uterosacral ligament: determination of the optimal site for uterosacral nerve ablation”. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., 2002, 54, 11.

[34] Suh D.H., Kim J.W., Aziz M.F., Devi U.K., Ngan H.Y.S., Nam J-H., et al.: “Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 21, 137.

[35] Kanao H., Fujiwara K., Ebisawa K., Hada T., Ota Y., Andou M.: “Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies and their effects on bladder function”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 25, 198.

[36] Fujii S., Takakura K., Matsumura N., Higuchi T., Yura S., Mandai M., et al.: “Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, 4.

[37] Kato T., Murakami G., Yabuki Y.: “A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament”. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 2003, 33, 589.

[38] Baader B., Herrmann M.: “Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis”. Clin. Anat. N. Y. N., 2003, 16, 119.

[39] Katahira A., Niikura H., Kaiho Y., Nakagawa H., Kurokawa K., Arai Y., et al.: “Intraoperative electrical stimulation of the pelvic splanchnic nerves during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 98, 462.

[40] Cibula D., Velechovska P., Sláma J., Fischerova D., Pinkavova I., Pavlista D., et al.: “Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 116, 506.

[41] Charoenkwan K.: “A simplified technique for nerve-sparing type III radical hysterectomy: by reorganizing their surgical sequence, surgeons could more easily identify key nerves”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 203, 600.e1.

[42] Wang W., Li B., Zuo J., Zhang G., Yang Y., Zeng H., et al.: “Evaluation of pelvic visceral functions after modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy”. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), 2014, 127, 696.

[43] Li B., Li W., Sun Y-C., Zhang R., Zhang G-Y., Yu G-Z., et al.: “Nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy: a simplified technique of nervesparing radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer”. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), 2011, 124, 1807.

[44] Puntambekar S.P., Palep R.J., Puntambekar S.S., Wagh G.N., Patil A.M., Rayate N.V., et al.: “Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2007, 14, 682.

[45] Park N.Y., Cho Y.L., Park I.S., Lee Y.S.: “Laparoscopic pelvic anatomy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy”. Clin. Anat. N. Y. N., 2010, 23, 186.

[46] Ceccaroni M., Pontrelli G., Spagnolo E., Scioscia M., Bruni F., Paglia A., et al.: “Parametrial dissection during laparoscopic nervesparing radical hysterectomy: a new approach aims to improve patients’ postoperative quality of life”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 202, 320.e1.

[47] Kim H.S., Kim T.H., Suh D.H., Kim S.Y., Kim M.A., Jeong C.W., et al.: “Success factors of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for preserving bladder function in patients with cervical cancer: a protocolbased prospective cohort study”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2015, 22, 1987.

[48] Puntambekar S.P., Patil A., Joshi S.N., Rayate N.V., Puntambekar S.S., Agarwal G.A.: “Preservation of autonomic nerves in laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy”. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A., 2010, 20, 813.

[49] Fujii S., Takakura K., Matsumura N., Higuchi T., Yura S., Mandai M., et al.: “Precise anatomy of the vesico-uterine ligament for radical hysterectomy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 104, 186.

[50] Handgraaf H.J.M., Verbeek F.P.R., Tummers Q.R.J.G., Boogerd L.S.F., van de Velde C.J.H., Vahrmeijer A.L., et al.: “Real-time nearinfrared fluorescence guided surgery in gynecologic oncology: a review of the current state of the art”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 135, 606.

[51] Whitney M.A., Crisp J.L., Nguyen L.T., Friedman B., Gross L.A., Steinbach P., et al.: “Fluorescent peptides highlight peripheral nerves during surgery in mice”. Nat. Biotechnol., 2011, 29, 352.

[52] Gibbs-Strauss S.L., Nasr K.A., Fish K.M., Khullar O., Ashitate Y., Siclovan T.M., et al.: “Nerve-highlighting fluorescent contrast agents for image-guided surgery”. Mol. Imaging, 2011, 10, 91.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top