Article Data

  • Views 532
  • Dowloads 139

Original Research

Open Access

The role of preoperative routine computed tomography scanning in the estimation of high- risk factors in endometrial cancers

  • G. Coban1,*,
  • G. Erbay2
  • F. Kose3
  • S. Alemdaroglu1
  • C. Onal4
  • H. Celik1

11 Başkent University, Medical School, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, (Adana Campus), Adana, Turkey

2Başkent University, Medical School, Department of Radiology, (Adana Campus), Adana, Turkey

3Başkent University, Medical School, Department of Medical Oncology, (Adana Campus), Adana, Turkey

4Başkent University, Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, (Adana Campus), Adana, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4184.2018 Vol.39,Issue 4,August 2018 pp.590-594

Published: 10 August 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): G. Coban E-mail: drgoncacoban@ yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: To examine the role of preoperative computed tomography (CT) in estimation of the high-risk factors in endometrial cancer cases. Materials and Methods: The data from 161 cases who were diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma with endometrial biopsy, and staged surgically were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic performance of a whole abdominal CT scan in terms of tumor diameter, myometrial invasion, cervical, adnexal, omental involvement, as well as pelvic para-aortic nodal involvement was examined. In addition, extra-uterine and extra-nodal incidental signs were identified. Results: The accuracy rate of preoperative CT scanning was found to be 42%, 78%, 80%, 95%, 97%, 88%, 89%, and 88% for tumor diameter, myometrial invasion, cervical, adnexal, and omental involvement, as well as pelvic para-aortic nodal involvement, respectively. Extra-uterine and extra-nodal incidental signs were identified in 18% of the cases. Incidental findings entailed a modification of management only in one case (0.62%). Conclusion: Preoperative CT scan findings do not present an alternative to intraoperative frozen section analysis or surgical staging. However, based on the findings from the preoperative CT scan, accuracy of predictions about which patients require more complex procedures (lymphadenectomy) can be improved, and therefore preoperative CT scanning may prove useful in more effective use of operating rooms.

Keywords

Computed Tomography; Endometrioid endometrial cancer; Imaging.

Cite and Share

G. Coban,G. Erbay,F. Kose,S. Alemdaroglu,C. Onal,H. Celik. The role of preoperative routine computed tomography scanning in the estimation of high- risk factors in endometrial cancers. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(4);590-594.

References

[1] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Gostout B.S., Jones M.B., Wilson T.O., et al.: “Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 11.

[2] Colombo N., Creutzberg C., Amant F., Bosse T., González-Martín A., Ledermann J., et al.: “ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Followup”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2016, 26, 2.

[3] Kayikçioğlu F., Boran N., Meydanli M.M., Tulunay G., Köse F.M., Bülbül D.: “Is frozen-section diagnosis a reliable guide in surgical treatment of stage I endometrial carcinoma?” Acta Oncol., 2002, 41, 444.

[4] Kumar S., Medeiros F., Dowdy S.C., Keeney G.L., Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Podratz K.C., et al.: “A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 127, 525.

[5] Pelikan H.M., Trum J.W., Bakers F.C., Beets-Tan R.G., Smits L.J., Kruitwagen R.F.: “Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review”. Cancer Imaging, 2013, 13, 314.

[6] Haldorsen I.S, Salvesen H.B.: “What is the best preoperative imaging for endometrial cancer? Curr. Oncol. Rep., 2016, 18, 25.

[7] Tsili A.C., Tsampoulas C., Dalkalitsis N., Stefanou D., Paraskevaidis E., Efremidis S.C.: “Local staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of multidetector CT”. Eur. Radiol., 2008, 18, 1043.

[8] Connor J.P., Andrews J.I., Anderson B., Buller R.E.: “Computed tomography in endometrial carcinoma”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 95, 692.

[9] https://www.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/gyencological/English/uterine.pdf

[10] Kim S.H., Kim H.D., Song Y.S., Kang S.B., Lee H.P.: “Detection of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, CT, and MRI”. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1995, 19, 766.

[11] Hardesty L.A., Sumkin J.H., Hakim C., Johns C., Nath M.: “The ability of helical CT to preoperatively stage endometrial carcinoma”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 2001, 176, 603

[12] Bansal N., Herzog T.J., Brunner-Brown A., Wethington S.L., Cohen CJ, Burke W.M., Wright J.D.: “The utility and cost effectiveness of preoperative computed tomography for patients with uterine malignancies”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 208.

[13] Chan J.K., Urban R., Cheung M.K., Shin J.Y., Husain A., Teng N.N., et al.: “Lymphadenectomy in endometroid uterine cancer staging. How many lymph nodes are enough? A study of 11 443 patients”. Cancer, 2007, 109, 2454.

[14] Panici P.B., Basile S., Maneschi F., Lissoni A.A., Signorelli M., Scambia G., et al.: “Systemic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in earlystage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[15] Antonsen S.L., Jensen L.N., Loft A., Berthelsen A.K., Costa J., Tabor A., et.al.: “MRI, PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer - a multicenter prospective comparative study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 128, 300.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top