Article Data

  • Views 557
  • Dowloads 132

Original Research

Open Access

Incidental appendectomy at the time of gynecologic surgery

  • M.F. Benoit1,*,
  • K.A. O’Hanlan2
  • M.S. Sten2
  • C.L. Kosnik1
  • D.M. Struck2
  • M.S. O’Holleran3
  • J. Cuff4
  • D.M. Halliday2
  • E.A. Kent1

1Division of Gynecologic Oncology Kaiser Permanente Washington, WA, USA

2Laparoscopic Institute for Gynecology and Oncology, Portola Valley, CA, USA

3Redwood Shores Surgery, Redwood City, CA, USA

4Peninsular Medical Group Pathologist, South San Francisco, CA , USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4244.2018 Vol.39,Issue 3,June 2018 pp.386-389

Published: 10 June 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): M.F. Benoit E-mail: benoit.m@ghc.org

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: This study was performed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of incidental appendectomy in a high risk gynecologic and gynecologic oncology patient population. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review evaluating 3,210 patients. Data reviewed included: age, preoperative diagnosis, route of surgery, procedure performed, length of stay, BMI, complications, and final diagnosis. Data was abstracted and analyzed; Mann-Whitney U and t-test were used to calculate outcomes. Significance was set at a p < 0.05 for each statistical test. Results: This study included 1,876 appendectomies that were performed at the time of gynecologic surgery. Eighty-two percent of procedures were performed laparoscopically. A high rate of abnormal pathology was identified: there were 32 (1.7%) primary appendiceal cancers identified, gynecologic cancer metastasis was identified in 71 (3.8%) patients, 12 (0.6%) patients had metastatic other cancer to the appendix, 40 (2.1%) patients had appendiceal endometriosis, and 25 (1.3%) patients had appendicitis. The total number of patients with significant appendiceal pathology was 221 (11.8%). No complications were attributed to the appendectomy procedure itself. BMI was not related to the ability to perform appendectomy (t-test, p = 0.9960), nor was route of surgery (t-test, p = 0.9256). Length of stay in the laparoscopic cohort was shorter for those who underwent appendectomy. Conclusions: Incidental appendectomy during gynecologic surgery is safe and feasible. This study documents that safety in an especially high risk gynecologic and oncologic patient cohort. This procedure can be routinely offered to address the increasing rate of acute appendicitis, occult malignancy, contribute to cancer debulking, and diagnose etiology of chronic pelvic pain in women concordant with their gynecologic surgery.

Keywords

Appendectomy; Incidental; Gynecology; Cancer; Feasible; Safe.

Cite and Share

M.F. Benoit,K.A. O’Hanlan,M.S. Sten,C.L. Kosnik,D.M. Struck,M.S. O’Holleran,J. Cuff,D.M. Halliday,E.A. Kent. Incidental appendectomy at the time of gynecologic surgery. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(3);386-389.

References

[1] Buckius M.T., McGrath B., Monk J., Grim R., Bell T., Ahuja V.: “Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008”. J. Surg. Res., 2012, 175, 185.

[2] Oliphant S.S., Jones K.A., Wang L., Bunker C.H., Lowder J.L.: “Trends over time with commonly performed obstetric and gynecologic inpatient procedures”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 116, 926.

[3] Connor S.J., Hanna G.B., Frizelle F.A.: “Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7970 appendectomies”. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1998, 41, 75.

[4] Chiarugi M., Buccianti P., Decanini L., Balestri R., Lorenzetti L., Franceschi M., et al.: “What you see is not what you get.” A plea to remove a ‘normal’ appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy”. Acta Chir. Belg., 2001, 101, 243.

[5] Addiss D.G., Shaffer N., Fowler B.S., Tauxe R.V.: “The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States”. Am. J. Epidemiol.,1990, 132, 910.

[6] National Cancer Institute: “SEER Stat Fact Sheets: “Endometrial Cancer”. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. National Institutes for Health, 2016. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html

[7] National Cancer Institute: “SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Ovarian Cancer”. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. National In-stitutes for Health, 2016.Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html

[8] National Cancer Institute: “SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Cervix Uteri Cancer”. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. National Institutes for Health, 2016. Avaialble at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html

[9] Luckmann R.: “Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age”. Am. J. Epidemiol.,1989, 129, 905.

[10] Lunca S., Bouras G., Romedea N.S.: “Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes”. Rom. J. Gastroenterol., 2004, 13, 299.

[11] Andersson A., Bergdahl L.: “Acute appendicitis in patients over sixty”. Am. Surg., 1978, 44, 445.

[12] Ryden C.I., Grunditz T., Janzon L.: “Acute appendicitis in patients above and below 60 years of age. Incidence rate and clinical course”. Acta Chir. Scand., 1983, 149, 165.

[13] Loeffler F., Stearn R.: “Abdominal hysterectomy with appendicectomy”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1967, 46, 435.

[14] Kovac S.R., Cruikshank S.H.: “Incidental appendectomy during vaginal hysterectomy”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 1993, 43, 62.

[15] Pearce C., Torres C., Stallings S., Adair D., Kipikasa J., Briery C., Fody E.: “Elective appendectomy at the time of cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 199, e491.

[16] Song J.Y., Yordan E., Rotman C.: “Incidental appendectomy during endoscopic surgery”. JSLS, 2009, 13, 376.

[17] Lyons T.L., Winer W.K., Woo A.: “Appendectomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain”. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 2001, 8, 542.

[18] Wie H.J., Lee J.H., Kyung M.S., Jung U.S., Choi J.S.: “Is incidental appendectomy necessary in women with ovarian endometrioma?” Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2008, 48, 107.

[19] Harris R.S., Foster W.G., Surrey M.W., Agarwal S.K.: “Appendiceal disease in women with endometriosis and right lower quadrant pain”. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 2001, 8, 536.

[20] Yoon J., Lee Y.S., Chang H.S., Park C.S.: “Endometriosis of the appendix”. Ann. Surg. Treat. Res., 2014, 87, 144.

[21] Carter J.E.: “Surgical treatment for chronic pelvic pain”. JSLS, 1998, 2, 129.

[22] Popović D., Kovjanić J., Milostic D., Kolar D., Stojaković D., Obradović Z., et al.: “Long-term benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy for chronic abdominal pain in fertile women”. Croat. Med. J.,

2004, 45, 171.

[23] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion: “Elective Coincidental Appendectomy. ACOG Comm Opin. No 323, Reaffirmed 2016”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 106, 1141.

[24] Strom P.R., Turkleson M.L., Stone H.H.: “Safety of incidental appendectomy”. Am. J. Surg., 1983, 145, 819.

[25] Salom EM1, Schey D, Peñalver M, Gómez-Marín O, Lambrou N, Almeida Z, Mendez L.: “The safety of incidental appendectomy at the time of abdominal hysterectomy”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 189, 1563.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top