Article Data

  • Views 596
  • Dowloads 151

Original Research

Open Access

Risk of cervical cancer and squamous intraepithelial lesions according to human papillomavirus high-risk serotypes detected by qualitative real-time in vitro PCR

  • R.J. Martinez-Portilla1,*,
  • M. Rial-Crestelo1
  • M.A. Mejia-Ugarte2
  • J.L. Lopez-Velazquez2

1Fetal Medicine Research Centre, BCNatal | Barcelona Centre for Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Medicine Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain

2Colposcopy Department, Adolfo Lopez Mateos Hospital, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4270.2019 Vol.40,Issue 1,February 2019 pp.19-22

Accepted: 26 June 2017

Published: 10 February 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): R.J. Martinez-Portilla E-mail: raifet@hotmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To establish the relationship between high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) serotypes and the odds of developing cervical intraepithelial lesions. Material and Methods: Retrospective cohort study using altered cervical cytology results and hrHPV test obtained by PCR. Groups were divided according to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and squamous cervical cancer (SCC) results, while hrHPV was divided according to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results in “other HR-HPV, HPV-16, and HPV-18. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the odds of each hrHPV serotype in developing squamous intraepithelial lesions or SCC. Results: A total of 252 samples were analysed, mean age was 42 ± 12.65 years. Prevalence of hrHPV infection was 60% (n=152). “Other HR-HPV” group was the most common infection in our population (39%); nonetheless, there were no increased odds for any HPV group and the risk for developing LSIL. The odds for HSIL were 4.58 and 7 for “other HR-HPV” and HPV-16, respectively. Odds for SCC were 11.29 and 7.35 for HPV-18 and HPV-16. There were no significant odds in HPV-18 for HSIL and “other HR-HPV” SCC. Conclusion: The present authors found a greater prevalence for “other HR-HPV” group in this population. Nonetheless, HPV-16 and HPV-18 contribute the highest probability of developing HSIL and SCC.

Keywords

Human papillomavirus; HPV; Prevalence; LSIL; HSIL; Cervical carcinoma

Cite and Share

R.J. Martinez-Portilla,M. Rial-Crestelo,M.A. Mejia-Ugarte, J.L. Lopez-Velazquez. Risk of cervical cancer and squamous intraepithelial lesions according to human papillomavirus high-risk serotypes detected by qualitative real-time in vitro PCR. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(1);19-22.

References

[1] Mukakalisa I., Bindler R., Allen C., Dotson J.: “Cervical cancer in developing countries: effective screening and preventive strategies with an application in Rwanda”. Health. Care. Women. Int., 2014, 35, 1065.

[2] Soler M.E., Gaffikin L., Blumenthal P.D.: “Cervical cancer screening in developing countries”. Prim. Care. Update. Ob. Gyns., 2000, 7, 118.

[3] Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., et al.: “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012”. Int. J. Cancer, 2015, 136, E359.

[4] Plummer M., de Martel C., Vignat J., Ferlay J., Bray F., Franceschi S.: “Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2012: a synthetic analysis”. Lancet. Glob. Health, 2016, 4, e609.

[5] Walboomers J.M., Jacobs M.V., Manos M.M., Bosch F.X., Kummer J.A., Shah K.V., et al.: “Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide”. J. Pathol., 1999, 189, 12.

[6] Orth G., Favre M., Croissant O.: “Characterization of a new type of human papillomavirus that causes skin warts”. J. Virol., 1977, 24, 108.

[7] Munoz N., Bosch F.X., de Sanjose S., Herrero R., Castellsague X., Shah K.V., et al.: “Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2003, 348, 518.

[8] Clifford G.M., Smith J.S., Aguado T., Franceschi S.: “Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: a meta-analysis”. Br. J. Cancer, 2003, 89, 101.

[9] Coser J., Boeira Tda.R., Wolf J.M., Cerbaro K., Simon D., Lunge V.R.: “Cervical human papillomavirus infection and persistence: a clinic-based study in the countryside from South Brazil”. Braz. J. Infect. Dis., 2016, 20, 61.

[10] Longatto-Filho A., Erzen M., Branca M., Roteli-Martins C., Naud P., Derchain S.F., et al.: “Human papillomavirus testing as an optional screening tool in low-resource settings of Latin America: experience from the Latin American Screening study”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2006, 16, 955.

[11] Mayrand M.H., Duarte-Franco E., Rodrigues I., Walter S.D., Hanley J., Ferenczy A., et al.: “Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 357, 1579.

[12] Massad L.S., Einstein M.H., Huh W.K., Katki H.A., Kinney W.K., Schiffman M., et al.: “2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 121, 829.

[13] WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee.: “WHO Guidelines for Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention-2”. Geneva, 2013.

[14] Solomon D., Davey D., Kurman R., Moriarty A., O’Connor D., Prey M., et al.: “The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology”. JAMA, 2002, 287, 2114.

[15] “Cervical cancer screening: quick reference guide, endocervical brush/spatula protocol”. Available at: http://wwwthinprepcom/hcp/ indexhtml.

[16] “Hologic, Inc. ThinPrep® 2000 system”. Avaliable at: http://wwwthinprepcom/pdfs/thinprep_package_insertpdf

[17] “Roche Molecular Systems, Inc”. Available at: http://wwwaccess- datafdagov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/p100020cpdf

[18] Bruni L., Diaz M., Castellsague X., Ferrer E., Bosch F.X., de Sanjose S.: “Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings”. J. Infect. Dis., 2010, 202, 1789.

[19] Mu Mu S., Harano T., Okada S., Aye Aye W., Khin Saw A., Hlaing Myat T., et al.: “Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HRHPV) infection among women with normal and abnormal cervical cytology in Myanmar”. Acta. Med. Okayama, 2014, 68, 79.

[20] Hammouda D., Clifford G.M., Pallardy S., Ayyach G., Chekiri A., Boudrich A., et al.: “Human papillomavirus infection in a population-based sample of women in Algiers, Algeria”. Int. J. Cancer., 2011, 128, 2224.

[21] Smith J.S., Lindsay L., Hoots B., Keys J., Franceschi S., Winer R., et al.: “Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update”. Int. J. Cancer, 2007, 121, 621.

[22] Martinez-Portilla R.J., Lopez-Velazquez J.L., Martinez-Rojas G.C., Aguilar-Villagomez M.I., De la Torre-Rendon F.E, Villafan-Bernal J.R.: “Prevalence of HPV high-risk serotypes detected by PCR in patients with normal cervical cytology at the Hospital Regional Adolfo Lopez Mateos, ISSSTE”. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex., 2016, 84, 556.

[23] Xu H., Lin A., Shao X., Shi W., Zhang Y., Yan W.: “Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV genotyping in women with high-grade cervical lesions: evidence for improving the cervical cancer screening strategy in China”. Oncotarget, 2016, 7, 83775.

[24] Kay P., Soeters R., Nevin J., Denny L., Dehaeck C.M., Williamson A.L.: “High prevalence of HPV 16 in South African women with cancer of the cervix and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. J. Med. Virol., 2003, 71, 265.

[25] Ghosh A.K., Smith N.K., Stacey S.N., Glew S.S., Connor M.E., Arrand J.R., et al.: “Serological response to HPV 16 in cervical dysplasia and neoplasia: correlation of antibodies to E6 with cervical cancer”. Int. J. Cancer., 1993, 53, 591.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top