Article Data

  • Views 554
  • Dowloads 128

Original Research

Open Access

Survival rate and complications after different types of pelvic exenteration for gynecological cancer

  • K. Nedyalkov1,*,
  • N. Magunska2
  • B. Bechev1
  • I. Kostov1

1FSOGH “St. Sofia”, Sofia, Bulgaria

2Ob/Gyn Hospital “Dr. Shterev”, Sofia, Bulgaria

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4285.2019 Vol.40,Issue 1,February 2019 pp.69-73

Accepted: 01 August 2017

Published: 10 February 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): K. Nedyalkov E-mail: nadya.magunska@abv.bg

Abstract

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an operative method for one-moment removal of pelvic organs, including reproductive tract, bladder, and rectosidgmoid. It is most commonly indicated in gynecologic oncology for treatment of locally advanced cancer or recurrence with central localization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival rate and complications in different types of PEs performed for cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer and to report the authors’ experience. Patients undergoing PE for cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer (n=46) were prospectively collected. Operative techniques types included total PE (n=9), anterior PE (n=14), posterior PE (n=7), and modified posterior PE (n=16). Overall intra and postoperative complication rate was 34.8% for the series. Mild complications occurred in 28.2% and severe complications in 6.5%. Perioperative mortality was 2.2%. PE in patients with advanced stage of gynecological malignancies was associated with high complication rate and high perioperative mortality and morbidity. Therefore, operative techniques with proven safety should be used. Creating ureter anastomosis with incontinent urinary conduit from terminal ileum can be considered as such technique. Although all factors that impact negative on quality of life, PE remains an alternative for extending life of these types of patients.

Keywords

Pelvic exenteration; Cervical cancer; Ovarian cancer; Endometrial cancer; Complications

Cite and Share

K. Nedyalkov,N. Magunska,B. Bechev, I. Kostov. Survival rate and complications after different types of pelvic exenteration for gynecological cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(1);69-73.

References

[1] Brunschwig A.: “Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma - a one-stage abdominoperineal operation with end colostomy and bilateral ureteral implantation into the colon above the colostomy”. Cancer, 1948, 1, 177.

[2] Goldberg J.M., Piver M.S., Hempling R.E., Aiduk C., Blumenson L., Recio F.O.: “Improvements in pelvic exenteration: factors responsible for reducing morbidity and mortality”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 1998, 5, 399.

[3] Bricker E.M.: “Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration”. Surg. Clin. North Am., 1950, 30, 1511.

[4] Buhchsbaum H.J., White A.J.: “Omental sling for management of the pelvic floor following exenteration”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1973, 117, 407.

[5] Eisenkop S.M., Nalick R.H., Teng N.N.: “Modified posterior exenteration for ovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 78, 879.

[6] Diver E.J., Rauh-Hain J.A., Del Carmen M.G.: “Total pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies”. Int. J. Surg. Oncol., 2012, 2012, 693535.

[7] Guimaraes G.C., Baiocchi G., Ferreira F.O., Kumagai L.Y., Fallopa C.C., Aguiar S., et al.: “Palliative pelvic exenteraтion for patients with gynecological malignancies”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2011, 283, 1107.

[8] Kecmanovic D.M., Pavlov M.J., Kovacevic P.A., Sepetkovski A.V., Ceranic M.S., Stamenkovic A.B.: “Management of advanced pelvic cancer by exenteration”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2003, 29, 743.

[9] Berek J.S., Howe C., Lagasse L.D., Hacker N.F.: “Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 153.

[10] Fotopoulou C., Neumann U., Kraetschell R., Schefold J.C., Weidemann H., Lichtenegger W., Sehouli J.: “Long-term clinical outcome of pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies”. J. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 101, 507.

[11] Forner D.M., Lampe B.: “Pelvic exenteration in the treatment of Stage III/IV vulvar cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 124, 87.

[12] Benn T., Brooks R.A., Zhang Q., Powell M.A., Thaker P.H., Mutch D.G., Zighelboim I.: “Pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology: A single institution study over 20 years”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 122, 14.

[13] Khory-Collardo F., Einstein M.H., Bochner B.H., Alektiar K.M., Sonoda Y., Abu-Rustum N.R., et al.: “Pelvic exenteration with curative intent for recurrent uterine malignancies”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 124, 42.

[14] Barakat R.R., Goldman N.A., Patel D.A., Venkartaman E.S., Curtin J.P.: “Pelvic exenteration for recurrent endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 75, 99.

[15] Hockel M., Sclender K., Hamm H.: “Five–year experience, with combined operative and radiotherapeutic treatment of recurrent tumors infiltrating the pelvic wall”. Cancer, 1996, 77, 1918.

[16] Numa F., Ogata H., Suminami Y., Tsunaga N., Nakamura Y., Tamura H., et al.: “Pelvic exenteration for the treatment of gynecological malignancies”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 1997, 259, 133.

[17] Schmidt A.M., Imesch P., Fink D., Egger H.: “Pelvic Exenterations for Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Clinical Outcomes of 40 Patients”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2016, 26, 716.

[18] Marnitz S., Dowdy S., Lanowska M., Schneider A., Podratz K., Kohler C.: “Exenteration 60 year after first description - Rezults of a Survey among US and German Gynecologic Ongcology Centers”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2009, 19, 974.

[19] Westin S.N., Rallapalli V., Fellman B., Urbauer D.L., Pal N., Frumovitz M.M., et al.: “Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 134, 546.

[20] Sharma S., Odunsi K., Driscoll D., Lele S.: “Pelvic exenterations for gynecological malignancies: twenty-year experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 475.

[21] Penalver M.A., Angioli R., Mirhashemi R., Malik R.: “Management of early and late complications of ileocolonic continent urinary reservoir (Miami pouch)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 69, 185.

[22] Houvenaeghel G., Moutardier V., Karsenty G., Bladou F., Lelong B., Buttarelli M., Delpero J.R.: “Major complications of urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a 23- year mono-institutional experience in 124 patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 680.

[23] Karsenty G., Moutardier V., Lelong B., Guiramand J., Houvenaeghel G., Delpero J.R., Bladou F.: “Long-term follow-up of continent urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 97, 524.

[24] Roos E.J., Van Eijkeren M.A., Boon T.A., Heintz A.P.: “Pelvic exenteration as treatment of recurrent or advanced gynecologic and urologic cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 624.

[25] Ferenschild F.T., Vermaas M., Verhoef C., Ansink A.C., Kirkels W.J., Eggermont A.M., de Wilt J.H.: “Total Pelvic Exenteration for Primary and Recurrent Malignancies". World. J. Surg., 2009, 33, 1502.

[26] Tixier H., Fraisse J., Chauffert B., Mayer F., Causeret S., Loustalot C., et al.: “Evaluation of pelvic posterior exenteration in the management of advanced stage ovarian cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2010, 281, 505.

[27] Houvenaeghel G., Gutowski M., Buttarelli M., Cuisenier J., Narducci F., Dalle C., et al.: “Modified posterior pelvic exenteration for ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2009, 19, 986.

[28] Goldberg G.L., Sukumvanich P., Einstein M.H., Smith H.O., Anderson P.S., Fields A.L.: “Total pelvic exenteration: The Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Experience (1987 to 2003)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 101, 261.

[29] Girtanner R.E., De Campo T., Alleyn J.N., Averette H.E.: “Routine intensive care for pelvic exenterative operations”. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1981, 153, 657.

[30] Devereux D.F., Sears H.F., Ketcham A.S.: “Intestinal fistula following pelvic exenterative surgery: Predisposing causes and treatment”. J. Surg. Oncol., 1980, 14, 227.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top