The effect of different cervical transformation zone types on the colposcopic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Purpose: To analyze the effects of cervical transformation zone (TZ) on the colposcopic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively evaluated 482 patients who underwent conizaion between September 2012 and September 2016. The cytology, colposcopic impressions and histological diagnoses from biopsy and cone specimens were compared. Results: An agreement of 88.1% was observed between high-grade cytology and final histological diagnoses among the three TZ types. Significant differences between the colposcopic impressions and final histological diagnoses were observed for TZ types 1 and 2 vs. type 3. The overall agreement was 89.1% regarding the histology findings on colposcopically directed biopsy (CDB) and cone specimens, which correlated significantly with TZ (p = 0.004) and the number of cervical biopsies (p = 0.032). The agreement between histology results on endocervical curettage (ECC) and the final histology results was 28.24% in the patients with TZ type 3. Conclusions: Cervical TZ types variably influence colposcopically diagnostic accuracy for CIN, and TZ type 3 was associated with the lowest accuracy.

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Colposcopically directed biopsy; Colposcopy; Squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix; Transformation zone

[1] Bornstein J., Bentley J., Bösze P., Girardi F., Haefner H., Menton M., et al.: “2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 120, 166.

[2] Jeronimo J., Schiffman M.: “Colposcopy at a crossroads”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 195,349.

[3] Sorbye S.W., Arbyn M., Fismen S., Gutteberg T.J., Mortensen E.S.: “HPVE6/E7 mRNA testing is more specific than cytology in post-colposcopy follow-up of women with negative cervical biopsy”. PLoS One, 2011, 6, e26022.

[4] Zuchna C., Hager M., Tringler B., Georgoulopoulos A., Ciresa-Koenig A., Volgger B., et al.: “Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicentre study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 203, e1.

[5] Duesing N., Schwarz J., Choschzick M., Jaenicke F., Gieseking F., Issa R., et al.: “Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)”. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2012, 286, 1549.

[6] Baldauf J.J., Dreyfus M., Ritter J., Philippe E.: “An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1997, 76, 468.

[7] Furtado Y., Almeida G., Lima R., Silva K., Maldonado P.: “Microinvasive squamous carcinoma (FIGO stage 1A1) of the cervix: are there colposcopic criteria for the diagnosis?” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2011, 205, 360.e1.

[8] Xiao F.Y., Wang Q., Zheng R.L., Chen M., Su T.T., Sui L.: “Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases”. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 2016, 51, 186. [Article in Chinese, English abstract]

[9] Vallikad E., Siddartha P.T., Kulkarni K.A., Firtion C., Keswarpu P., Vajinepalli P., et al.: “Intra and Inter-Observer Variability of Transformation Zone Assessment in Colposcopy: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study”. J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 2017, 11, XC04.

[10] Müller K., Soergel P., Hillemanns P., Jentschke M.: “Accuracy of Colposcopically Guided Diagnostic Methods for the Detetion of Cervical Intraepithelia Neoplasia”. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd., 2016, 76, 182.

[11] Pretorius R.G., Belinson J.L., Burchette R.J., Hu S., Zhang X., Qiao Y.L.: “Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy”. J. Low. Genit. Tract. Dis., 2011, 15, 180.

[12] Wentzensen N., Walker J.L., Gold M.A., Smith K.M., Zuna R.E., Mathews C., et al.: “Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 33, 83.

[13] Nakamura Y., Matsumoto K., Satoh T., Nishide K., Nozue A., Shimabukuro K., et al.: “Optimizing biopsy procedures during colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 20, 579.

[14] Luyten A., Buttmann-Schweiger N., Hagemann I., Scherbring S., Boehmer G., Gieseking F., et al.: “Utility and Reproducibility of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Classification of Transformation Zones in Daily Practice: A Multi-center Study of the German Colposcopy Network”. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis., 2015, 19, 185.

[15] Solomon D., Stoler M., Jeronimo J., Khan M., Castle P., Schiffman M.: “Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities’. Obstet. Gynecol., 2007, 110, 288.

[16] Tidy J.: “NHS Cervical Screening Programme Colposcopy and Programme Management”. NHSCSP Publication number 20, Third Edition March 2016. Available at: https://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/NHSCSP_20_Colposcopy_and_Programme_Man agement_(3rd_Edition)_(2).pdf