Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
A case of uterine incarceration caused by carcinosarcoma accompanied with pyometra
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Kita-ku, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4392.2019 Vol.40,Issue 2,April 2019 pp.328-330
Accepted: 06 September 2017
Published: 10 April 2019
*Corresponding Author(s): S. Koyama E-mail: skoyama@gyne.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
Uterine incarceration is rare clinical condition which principally occurs after the first trimester during pregnancy. Main clinical symptoms of uterine incarceration are abdominal pain and urinary symptoms such as urinary retention. Until now, almost all cases of uterine incarceration have been associated with the gravid uterus. To the present authors’ knowledge, only a few reports of this condition associated with uterine leiomyoma have been reported in the English literature. They present the first case of uterine incarceration caused by malignant gynecologic neoplasm (carcinosarcoma) accompanied with pyometra. Inferring from the patient’s symptoms and vaginal examination findings, they clinically diagnosed her as uterine incarceration, thereafter magnetic resonance imaging revealed characteristic findings consistent with uterine incarceration. The clinical course of the present case and clinical considerations regarding uterine incarceration are discussed.
Carcinosarcoma; Pyometra; Retroverted uterus; Urinary retention; Uterine incarceration
S. Koyama,S. Fujiwara,M. Yagi,K. Kuritani,M. Watanabe,Y. Shiki. A case of uterine incarceration caused by carcinosarcoma accompanied with pyometra. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(2);328-330.
[1] Shnaekel K.L., Wendel M.P., Rabie N.Z., Magann E.F.: “Incarceration of the Gravid Uterus”. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv., 2016, 71, 613.
[2] Al Wadi K., Helewa M., Sabeski L.: “Asymptomatic uterine incarceration at term: a rare complication of pregnancy”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can., 2011, 33, 729.
[3] Kim S.C., Lee Y.J., Jeong J.E., Joo J.K., Lee K.S.: “Incarceration of gravid uterus by growing subserosal myoma: case report”. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol., 2016, 43, 131.
[4] Fernandes D.D., Sadow C.A., Economy K.E., Benson C.B.: “Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in uterine incarceration”. J. Ultrasound. Med., 2012, 31, 645.
[5] Gardner C.S., Jaffe T.A., Hertzberg B.S., Javan R., Ho L.M.: “The incarcerated uterus: a review of MRI and ultrasound imaging appearances”. Am. J. Roentgenol., 2013, 201, 223.
[6] Hankins G.D., Cedars M.I.: “Uterine incarceration associated with uterine leiomyomata: clinical and sonographic presentation”. J. Clin. Ultrasound, 1989, 17, 385.
[7] Haylen B.T.: “Urinary retention secondary to a uterine leiomyoma: is it nonpregnant incarceration of a retroverted uterus?” Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct., 2007, 18, 1247.
[8] Yazdany T., Bhatia N.N., Nguyen J.N.: “Urinary retention and voiding dysfunction in women with uterine leiomyoma: a case series”. J. Reprod. Med., 2012, 57, 384.
[9] Gottschalk E.M., Siedentopf J.P., Schoenborn I., Gartenschlaeger S., Dudenhausen J.W., Henrich W.: “Prenatal sonographic and MRI findings in a pregnancy complicated by uterine sacculation: case report and review of the literature”. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 32, 582.
[10] Cantrell L.A., Blank S.V., Duska L.R.: “Uterine carcinosarcoma: A review of the literature”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 137, 581.
[11] Newell S.D., Crofts J.F., Grant S.R.: “The incarcerated gravid uterus: complications and lessons learned”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 123, 423.
Top