Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
A retrospective analysis of giant ovarian tumors weighing more than 5,000 grams
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4414.2019 Vol.40,Issue 4,August 2019 pp.563-566
Accepted: 26 October 2017
Published: 10 August 2019
*Corresponding Author(s): Yoshiya Miyahara E-mail: ymiya@med.kobe-u.ac.jp
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between pathology, operative complications, and giant ovarian tumor weighing more than 5,000 grams. Materials and Methods: The authors assessed 11 factors of 18 patients with giant ovarian tumors after surgery, including age, performance status (PS), total weight of the tumor, fluid weight of the tumor, pathology, side, preoperative serum D-dimer, rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), intraoperative complications, and rate of postoperative ICU management. The subjects were divided into two groups: tumor weight ≥ 10,000 grams (group ≥ 10,000 grmas) and tumor weight < 10,000 grams (group < 10,000 grams), and the same factors were compared between two groups. Results: The most frequent pathology of giant ovarian tumors weighing more than 5,000 grmas was found to be adenocarcinoma. Compared to 11 patients of group < 10,000 grmas, seven patients out of group ≥ 10,000 grmas had a significantly higher rate of intra-abdominal adhesion (85.7% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.05), blood loss weight (890 grams vs. 130 grams, p < 0.05), and rate of postoperative ICU management (85.7% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.05), respectively. Conclusions: Much attention should be paid to patients with giant ovarian tumors, and aggressive surgery is recommended due to a frequent incidence of cancer.
Giant ovarian tumor; Mucinous adenocarcinoma; Mucinous border line tumor
Yoshiya Miyahara,Hitomi Imafuku,Yuka Murata,Yasuhiko Ebina,Hideto Yamada. A retrospective analysis of giant ovarian tumors weighing more than 5,000 grams. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(4);563-566.
[1] Alobaid A., Memon A., Alobaid S., Aldakhil L.: “Laparoscopic management of huge ovarian cysts”. Obstet. Gynecol. Int., 2013, 380854.
[2] Salem HA.: “ Laparoscopic excision of large ovarian cysts”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2002, 28, 290.
[3] Manchanda R., Kriplani A.: “Giant malignant ovarian tumor: a case report”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 1135.
[4] Nakamura M., Saitoh M., Miyamoto S., Kubo Y., Tomita H., Andoh A.: “Case of a giant mucinous ovarian carcinoma with bone metastasis”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2005, 31, 576-578.
[5] Yanazume Y., Yoshinaga M., Yanazume S., Kamikihara T., Tokunaga M., Kamio M., et al.: “Giant ovarian cancer weighing 100 kg with poor prognosis”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2007, 33, 91-94.
[6] Kim Y.T., Kim J.W., Choe B.H.: “A case of huge ovarian cyst of 21-year-old young woman”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 1999, 25, 275-279.
[7] Kondi-Pafiti A., Bakalianou C., Dastamanis C., Papadias K., Iavazzo C., Liapis A.: “A giant ovarian mucinous cystic neoplasm weighing 8,500 grams with functional stroma. A case report and literature review”. Eur. J.Gynaecol. Oncol., 2009, 30, 704-706.
[8] Kobayashi H., Sumimoto K., Kitanaka T., Yamada Y., Sado T., Sakata M., et al.: “Ovarian endometrioma—risks factors of ovarian cancer development”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol.Reprod.Biol., 2008, 138, 187.
[9] Ottesen M., Rose M.: “Giant ovarian tumor masked by obesity”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1994, 73, 349.
[10] Karaman A., Azili M.N., Boduroğlu E.C., Karaman I., Erdoğan D., Cavuşoğlu Y.H., et al.: “A huge ovarian mucinous cystadenoma in a 14-year-old premenarchal girl: review on ovarian mucinous tumor in premenarchal girls”. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol., 2008, 21, 41.
[11] Cevik M., Guldur M.E.: “An extra-large ovarian mucinous cystadenoma in a premenarchal girl and a review of the literature”. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol., 2013, 26, 22.
[12] Ueda S., Yamada Y., Tsuji Y., Kawaguchi R., Haruta S., Shigetomi H., et al.: “Giant abdominal tumor of the ovary”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.Res., 2008, 34, 108.
Top