Article Data

  • Views 581
  • Dowloads 135

Original Research

Open Access

Intra-operative and postoperative complications depend on operating approach and body mass index in patients with malignant uterus body neoplasm

  • A. Mladěnka1
  • P. Mladěnka2
  • O. Simetka1
  • J. Klát1,*,

1Oncogynaecologic center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic

2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Prague, Czech Republic

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4487.2019 Vol.40,Issue 4,August 2019 pp.593-598

Accepted: 27 November 2017

Published: 10 August 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): J. Klát E-mail: jaroslav.klat@fno.cz

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer of the uterus body is the fourth most frequent tumor in females. The standard approach is a hysterectomy. Although laparoscopy (LPS) is advantageous, to date, no complex, conclusive data have compared the complication rates between LPS and laparotomy (LT) in real clinical settings, with a long-term follow up. This study aimed to compare these two approaches in terms of perioperative, and early postoperative, and late postoperative complications, and to analyze associations between complications and patient characteristics (e.g., body mass index). Materials and Methods: The outcomes of hysterectomy were retrospectively analyzed in 812 consecutive patients with uterus body tumors. Results: The frequency of peri-operative complications was similar between LPS (3.4%) and LT (2.9%). However, in the early postoperative period, complication rates were 26.6% for LT and only 3.4% for LPS (p < 0.001). A similar trend was found in the late complication rates (51.3 vs. 24.4%, respectively; p < 0.001). Higher degrees of obesity were associated with increased complication frequencies after LT in the early postoperative period (p = 0.03). Increases in BMI were linearly related to the risk of postoperative complications (p = 0.002). This relationship was not observed after LPS for any type of complication. Interestingly, the frequencies of incisional hernia and dehiscence were highly dependent on which surgeon performed the LT (p = 0.002). Conclusions: In extremely obese patients, the first method of choice should be LPS.

Keywords

Surgery complications; Uterus body; Neoplasm; Body mass index; Incisional hernia

Cite and Share

A. Mladěnka,P. Mladěnka,O. Simetka,J. Klát. Intra-operative and postoperative complications depend on operating approach and body mass index in patients with malignant uterus body neoplasm. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(4);593-598.

References

[1] R., Ferlay J.: “Worldwide burden of gynaecological cancer: the size of the problem”. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2006, 20, 207.

[2] Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic Epidemiology of malignant tumors in the Czech republic: “Malignant tumors of uterine body”. Available at: http://www.svod.cz/graph/?sessid=sa8534rieos2aclhqh76hjst 31&typ=incmor&diag=C54&pohl=z&kraj=&vek_od=1&vek_do=18&zobrazeni=table&incidence=1&mortalita=1&mi=0&vypocet=c& obdobi_od=1977&obdobi_do=2012&stadium=&t=&n=&m=&pt= &pn=&pm=&t=&n=&zije=&umrti=&lecba=

[3] Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic Epidemiology of malignant tumors in the Czech republic: “Malignant tumors of the uterine cervix”. Available at: http://www.svod.cz/ graph/?sessid=sa8534rieos2aclhqh76hjst31&typ=incmor&diag=C5 3&pohl=z&kraj=&vek_od=1&vek_do=18&zobrazeni=table&inci- dence=1&mortalita=0&mi=0&vypocet=c&obdobi_od=1977&ob- dobi_do=2012&stadium=&t=&n=&m=&pt=&pn=&pm=&t=&n=& zije=&umrti=&lecba=

[4] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Galli L., Podratz K.C.: “Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 76, 348.

[5] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Keeney G.L., Podratz K.C.: “Routes of lymphatic spread: a study of 112 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 81, 100.

[6] Galaal K., Bryant A., Fisher A.D., Al-Khaduri M., Kew F., Lopes A.D.: “Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer”. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2012, 9, CD006655.

[7] Obermair A., Janda M., Baker J., Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S., Brand A., Hogg R., et al.: “Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: Results from a randomised controlled trial”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2012, 48, 1147.

[8] Obermair A., Manolitsas T.P., Leung Y., Hammond I.G., McCartney A.J.: “Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 319.

[9] Volpi E., Ferrero A., Jacomuzzi M.E., Carus A.P., Fuso L., Martra F., et al.: “Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: feasibility and results”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2006, 124, 232.

[10] Pellegrino A., Signorelli M., Fruscio R., Villa A., Buda A., Beretta P., et al.: “Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic limphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2009, 279, 655.

[11] Tollund L., Hansen B., Kjer J.J.: “Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2006, 85, 1138.

[12] EHIS 2014 Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. Available at: http://www.uzis.cz/en/system/files/EHIS2014_3_ Zdravotni_determinanty.xlsx

[13] Perrone A.M., Di Marcoberardino B., Rossi M., Pozzati F., Pellegrini A., Procaccini M., et al.: “Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach to endometrial cancer”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2012, 33, 376.

[14] Bijen C.B.M., de Bock G.H., Vermeulen K.M., Arts H.J.G., ter Brugge H.G., van der Sijde R., et al.: “Laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferred over laparotomy in early endometrial cancer patients, however not cost effective in the very obese”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2011, 47, 2158.

[15] Eltabbakh G.H., Shamonki M.I., Moody J.M., Garafano L.L.: “Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 78, 329.

[16] Zullo F., Falbo A., Palomba S.: “Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 207, 94.

[17] Anthony T., Bergen P.C., Kim L.T., Henderson M., Fahey T., Rege R.V., et al.: “Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy”. World J. Surg., 2000, 24, 95.

[18] Manninen M.J., Lavonius M., Perhoniemi V.J.: “Results of incisional hernia repair. A retrospective study of 172 unselected hernioplasties”. Eur. J. Surg., 1991, 157, 29.

[19] Paul A., Korenkov M., Peters S., Kohler L., Fischer S., Troidl H.: “Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias”. Eur. J. Surg., 1998, 164, 361.

[20] Read R.C., Yoder G.: “Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation”. Arch. Surg., 1989, 124, 485.

[21] Hoer J., Lawong G., Klinge U., Schumpelick V.: “Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years”. Chirurg., 2002, 73, 474.

[22] Mudge M., Hughes L.E.: “Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes”. Br. J. Surg., 1985, 72, 70.

[23] van Ramshorst G.H., Eker H.H., Hop W.C., Jeekel J., Lange J.F.: “Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study”. Am. J. Surg., 2012, 204, 144.

[24] Caro-Tarrago A., Olona Casas C., Jimenez Salido A., Duque Guilera E., Moreno Fernandez F., Vicente Guillen V.: “Prevention of incisional hernia in midline laparotomy with an onlay mesh: a randomized clinical trial”. World J. Surg., 2014, 38, 2223.

[25] Nieuwenhuizen J., Eker H.H., Timmermans L., Hop W.C., Kleinrensink G.J., Jeekel J., et al.: “A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence”. BMC Surg., 2013, 13, 48.

[26] Timmermans L., Eker H.H., Steyerberg E.W., Jairam A., de Jong D., Pierik E.G., et al.: “Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture with primary glued mesh augmentation to prevent incisional hernia”. Ann. Surg., 2015, 261, 276.

[27] Devaja O., Samara I., Papadopoulos A.J.: “Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study”. Int. J. Gynecol Cancer, 2010, 20, 570.

[28] McIlwaine K., Manwaring J., Ellett L., Cameron M., Readman E., Villegas R., et al.: “The effect of patient body mass index on surgical difficulty in gynaecological laparoscopy”. Aust N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2014, 54, 564.

[29] Mahdi H., Jernigan A.M., Aljebori Q., Lockhart D., Moslemi-Kebria M.: “The impact of obesity on the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2015, 22, 94.

[30] Tinelli R., Litta P., Meir Y., Surico D., Leo L., Fusco A., et al.: “Advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in extremely obese women (BMI>35) with early-stage endometrial cancer: a multicenter study”. Anticancer Res., 2014, 34, 2497.

[31] Poulose B.K., Shelton J., Phillips S., Moore D., Nealon W., Penson D., et al.: “Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research”. Hernia, 2012, 16, 179.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top