Article Data

  • Views 663
  • Dowloads 115

Original Research

Open Access

Surgical site infection in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing open surgery

  • Y. Arakaki1
  • T. Nakasone1
  • Y. Kinjyo1
  • Y. Shimoji1
  • Y. Taira1
  • T. Nakamoto1
  • A. Wakayama1
  • T. Ooyama1
  • W. Kudaka1
  • Y. Aoki1,*,

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4501.2019 Vol.40,Issue 4,August 2019 pp.599-602

Accepted: 09 November 2017

Published: 10 August 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Aoki E-mail: yoichi@med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp

Abstract

Purpose: Women with endometrial cancer have several risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI). The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, SSIs in endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods: Women with endometrial cancer who underwent primary open surgery at this institute between 2012 and 2014 were analyzed. Patients with and without SSI were compared. Results: Of all 107 patients, ten (9.3%) were diagnosed with SSI. Univariate analyses assessed age, BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, postoperative body temperature, and serum albumin level as potential risk factors. There was no significant correlation between the mode of lymph node surgery and the occurrence of SSI. Multivariate analysis indicated that BMI was independently associated with a higher risk for SSI. Conclusions: Of all the tested, obesity exhibited the most significant risk factor for SSI in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing open surgery.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Surgical site infection; Open surgery; BMI; Risk factorEndometrial cancer; Surgical site infection; Open surgery; BMI; Risk factor

Cite and Share

Y. Arakaki,T. Nakasone,Y. Kinjyo,Y. Shimoji, Y. Taira,T. Nakamoto,A. Wakayama,T. Ooyama,W. Kudaka,Y. Aoki. Surgical site infection in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing open surgery. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(4);599-602.

References

[1] Boyce J.M., Potter-Bynoe G., Dziobek L.: Hospital reimbursement patterns among patients with surgical wound infections following open heart surgery. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 1990, 11, 89.

[2] Kirkland K.B., Briggs J.P., Trivette S.L., Wilkinson W.E., Sexton D.J.: The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 1999, 20, 725.

[3] Poulsen K.B., Bremmelgaard A., Sørensen A.I., Raahave D., Petersen J.V.: Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections. A case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol. Infect. 1994, 113, 283.

[4] Mangram A.J., Horan T.C., Pearson M.L., Silver L.C., Jarvis W.R.: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 1999, 20, 250.

[5] Santi A., Kuhn A., Gyr T., Eberhard M., Johann S., Günthert A.R., Mueller M.D.: Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A comparison of 240 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Surg. Endosc. 2010, 24, 939

[6] Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Dowdy S.C., Borah B.J., Haas L.R., Mariani A., Martin J.R., et al.: Predictors and costs of surgical site infections in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013, 130, 100.

[7] Erekson E.A., Yip S.O., Ciarleglio M.M., Fried T.R.: Postoperative complications after gynecologic surgery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 118, 785.

[8] Ko E.M., Walter P., Clark L., Jackson A., Franasiak J., Bolac C., et al.: The complex triad of obesity, diabetes and race in Type I and II endometrial cancers: prevalence and prognostic significance. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 133, 28.

[9] Korol E., Johnston K., Waser N., Sifakis F., Jafri H.S., Lo M., Kyaw M.H.: A systematic review of risk factors associated with surgical site infections among surgical patients. PLoS. One. 2013, 8, e83743.

[10] Kadija S., Stefanović A., Jeremić K., Tavcar J., Argirović R., Pantović S.: Malignant disease as a risk factor for surgical site infection. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 39, 53.

[11] Lake A.G., McPencow A.M., Dick-Biascoechea M.A., Martin D.K., Erekson E.A.: Surgical site infection after hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 2209, 490.e1.

[12] Giugale L.E., Di Santo N., Smolkin M.E., Havrilesky L.J., Modesitt S.C. Beyond mere obesity: effect of increasing obesity classifications on hysterectomy outcomes for uterine cancer/hyperplasia. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012, 127, 326.

[13] Rasmussen K.L., Neumann G., Ljungstrom B., Hansen V., Lauszus F.F.: The influence of body mass index on the prevalence of complications after vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2004, 83, 85.

[14] Ghezzi F., Cromi A., Bergamini V., Uccella S., Beretta P., Franchi M., Bolis P.: Laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in nonobese and obese women: A consecutive series. J. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol. 2006, 13, 269.

[15] Kodama J., Seki N., Ojima Y., Nakamura K., Hongo A., Hiramatsu Y.: Risk factors for early and late postoperative complications of patients with endometrial cancer. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006, 124, 222.

[16] NNIS System: “National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, Data Summary from January 1990-May 1999, issued June 1999. A report from the NNIS System”. Am. J. Infect. Control. 1999, 27, 520.

[17] Vamvakas E.C., Carven J.H.: Transfusion of white-cell containing allogeneic blood components and postoperative wound infection: effect of confounding factors. Transfus. Med. 1998, 8, 29.

[18] Jido T., Garba I.: Surgical-site Infection Following Cesarean Section in Kano, Nigeria. Ann. Med. Health. Sci. Res. 2012, 2, 33.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top