Article Data

  • Views 546
  • Dowloads 129

Original Research

Open Access

Histopathologic features of advanced stage endometrial carcinoma

  • S. Kabukcuoglu1,*,
  • B. Hayit1

1Department of Pathology, The University of Eskisehir Osmangazi School of Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4553.2019 Vol.40,Issue 4,August 2019 pp.614-618

Accepted: 10 January 2018

Published: 10 August 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): S. Kabukcuoglu E-mail: skabukcuoglu@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: Four to six percent of endometrial cancer (EC) cases have been diagnosed at an advanced stage. The aim of the study is to show the role of immunohistochemistry in the new endometrial carcinoma classification. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine advanced Stage EC cases which were admitted to the Eskisehir Osmangazi Hospital were included in the study. One grade 1, 18 grade 2, and ten grade 3 EC cases were detected. Ten EC cases showed focal or diffuse strong p53 expression and three cases had Lynch syndrome with the dual loss of MLH1 and PMS2. In those cases that were above 60-years-old, PTEN inactivation, loss of PAX-8, and strong p16 positivity were detected. Five cases had focal or complete e-cadherin loss or inactivation and ten cases had focal CDX-2 expression and/or β cathenin nuclear expression due to β-cathenin mutation. Results: Nine out of 22 cases who had deep myometrial invasion showed MELF pattern of myometrial invasion (p = 0.05). Fallopian tube involvements were associated with mild p53 positivity (p = 0.002) and peritoneal washing fluid positivities were correlated with serosal involvement (p = 0.013). Three cases (10.3%) showed recurrences and one case died from the disease during the study. Conclusions: Tubal endometriosis or adenomyomatous polyp were found in the other tube in ECs with tubal involvement and these case had superficial myometrial invasion. Strong p53 expression and Lynch syndrome coexisted with the e-cadherin and β-cathenin mutations in advanced stage ECs.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Immunohistochemistry; p53; MLH1; Advanced stage; Endometriosis

Cite and Share

S. Kabukcuoglu,B. Hayit. Histopathologic features of advanced stage endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(4);614-618.

References

[1] Malagon-Blackwell E.M., Seagle B.L., Nieves-Neira W., Shahabi S.: “The Hispanic paradox in endometrial cancer: A national cancer database study.’’ Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 146, 351.

[2] Morice P., Leary A., Creutzberg C., Abu-Rustum N., Darai E.: “Endometrial Cancer’’, Lancet, 2016, 387, 1094.

[3] Havrilesky L.J., Secord A.A., O’Malley D.M., Broadwater G., BaeJump V., Cohn D.E., Gehrig P.A.: Multicenter analysis of recurrence and survival in Stage IIIA endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 114, 279.

[4] Holman L.L., Pal N., Iglesias D.A., Soliman P.T., Balakrishnan N., Klopp A., Broaddus R.R., et al.: “Factors prognostic of survival in advanced-stage uterine serous carcinoma.’’ Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 146, 27.

[5] Velasco A., Pallares J., Santacana M., Yeramian A., Dolcet X., Eritja N., Puente S., et al.: “Loss of heterozygosity in endometrial carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2008, 27, 305.

[6] McCluggage W.G.: “Benign diseases of the endometrium”. In: Kurman R.J., Ellenson L.H., Ronett B.M. (eds). Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. 6th ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, 307.

[7] Malpica A., Deavers M.T.: “Ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma involving the cervix mimicking a cervical primary’’. Int. J. Gynaecol. Pathol., 2011, 30, 613.

[8] Sullivan L.M, Smolkin M.E, Frierson H.F, Galgano M.T.: “Comprehensive evaluation of CDX2 in invasive cervix adenocarcinomas. Immunopositivity in the absence of overt colerectal morphology’’. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2008, 32, 1608.

[9] Vang R., Gown A.M., Farinola M., Barry T.S., Wheeler D.T., Yemelnova A., Seidman J.D, et al.: “P16 expression in primary ovarian mucinous and endometrioid tumors and metastatic adenocarcinoma in the ovary. Utility for identification of metastatic HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinomas.’’ Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2007, 31, 653.

[10] Lu B., Chen Q., Zheng X., Cheng L.: “Serous carcinoma arising from adenomyoma/adenomyotic cyst of the cervical stump, report of 3 cases’’. Diagnos. Pathol., 2016, 11, 46-56.

[11] Ayhan A., Yalcin O.T., Tuncer Z.S, Gurgan T., Kucukali T.: “Synchronous primary malignancies of the female genital tract”. Eur. J. Obset. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol., 1992, 45, 63.

[12] Kabukcuoglu S., Soykan C.:“Peritumoral allergic response in epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2012, 33, 555.

[13] Kan O., Alkilic A., Turgay B., Gemici A., Atabekoglu C.S: “Triple synchronous malignancies in genital tract; primary endometrial, ovarian and fallopian tube carcinoma: A case report’’. J. Clin. Diagnos. Res., 2017, 11, 1.

[14] Urabe R., Hachisuga T., Kurita T., Kagami S., Kawagoe T., Matsuura Y., Shimajiri S.: “Prognostic significance of overexpression of p53 in uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas with an analysis of nuclear grade”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2014, 40, 812.

[15] Zaino R.J.:“Unusual patterns of endometrial carcinoma including MELF and its relation to epithelial mesenchymal transition”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2014, 33, 357.

[16] Rossi E.D., Bizzarro T., Monterossi G., Inzani F., Fanfani F., Scambia G., Zannoni G.F.: “Clinicopathological analysis of mixed endometrial carcinomas: clinical relevance of different neoplastic components”. Hum. Pathol., 2017, 62, 99.

[17] Kounelis S., Kapranos N., Kouri E., Coppola D., Papadaki H., Jones M.W.: “Immunohistochemical profile of endometrial adenocarcinoma: A study of 61 cases and review of the literature’’. Mod. Pathol., 2000, 13, 379.

[18] Carasco-Garcia E., Moreno M., Moreno-Cugnon L., Matheu A.: “Increased Arf/p53 activity in stem cells, aging and cancer”. Aging Cell, 2017, 16, 219.

[19] Wang G., Fu Y., Hu F., Lan J., Xu F., Yang X., Luo X.: “Loss of BRG1 induces CRC cell senescence by regulating p53/p21 pathway” Cell Death Dis., 2017, 8, E2607.

[20] Kato A., Sato N., Sugawara T., Takahashi K., Kito M., Kenichi M., Toshiharu S., et al.: “Isolated loss of PMS2 immunohistochemical expression is frequently caused by heterogenous MLH1 promotor hypermethylation in Lynch syndrome screening for endometrial cancer patients.’’ Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2016, 40, 770.

[21] Billingsley C.C., Cohn D.E., Mutch D.G., Stephens J.A., Saurez A.A., Goodfellow P.J.: “Polymerase ε (POLE) mutations in endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and implications for Lynch syndrome testing’’. Cancer, 2015, 121, 386.

[22] Horree N., Heintz A.P.M., Sie-Go D.M.D.S., vanDiest P.J.: “P16 is consistently expressed in endometrial tubal metaplasia”. Cellular Oncol., 2007, 29, 37.

[23] Simon R.A., Peng S.L., Liu F., Quddus M.R., Zhang C., Steinhoff M.M., et al.: “Tubal metaplasia of the endometrium with cytologic atypia: analysis of p53, Ki-67, TERT, and long term follow-up”. Mod. Pathol., 2011, 24, 1254.

[24] Laury A.R., Perets R., Piao H., Krane J.F., Barletta J.A. French C., et al.: “A comprehensive analysis of PAX8 expression in human epithelial tumors’’. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2011, 35, 816.

[25] Giordano G., Gnetti L., Merisio C., Melpignano M.: “Postmenopausal status hypertension and obesity as risk factors for malignant transformations for endometrial polyps.’’ Maturitas. 2007, 56, 190-197.

[26] Sinreih M., Stupar S., Cemazar L., Verdenik I., Grazio S.F., Smrkolj S., Rizner T.L.: “STAR and AKR1B10 are down-regulated in high-grade endometrial cancer.’’ J. Ster. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 2017, 171, 43.

[27] Murray S.K., Young R.H., Scully R.E.: “Unusual epithelial and stromal changes in myoinvasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a study of their frequency, associated diagnostic problems, and prognostic significance”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol, 2003, 22, 324.

[28] Stewart C.J., Crook M.L., Manso L.: “Fascin expression in lowgrade uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma: correlation with microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF)-type alteration at the deep invasive margin”. Histopathology, 2011, 59, 73.

[29] Pavlakis K., Messini I., Vrekoussis T., Panoskaltsis T., Chrysanthakis D., Yiannou P., Voulgaris Z.: “MELF invasion in endometrial cancer as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis”. Histopathology, 2011, 58, 966.

[30] Euscher E., Fox P., Basset R., Al-Ghawi H., Ali-Fehmi R., Barbuto D., et al.: “The pattern of myometrial invasion as a predictor of lymph node metastasis or extrauterine disease in low grade endometrial carcinoma”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2013, 37, 1728.

[31] Joehlin-Price A.S., McHugh K.E., Stephens J.A., Zaibo L., Backes F.J., Cohn D.E., et al.: “ The microcystic, elongated, and fragmented (MELF) pattern of invasion: A single institution report of 464 consecutive FIGO Grade 1 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2017, 41, 49.

[32] Ozkan N.T., Meydanli M.M., Sari M., Demirkiran F., Kahramanoglu I., Bese T., et al.: “Factors associated with survival after relapse with low risk endometrial cancer treated surgicaly alone”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 28, e65.

[33] Sanci M., Gungorduk K., Gulseren V., Karadeniz T., Kocaer M., Gungorduk O., Ozdemir I.A.: “MELF pattern for predicting lymph node involvement and survival in Grade I-II endometrioid type endometrium cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2018, 37, 17.

[34] Giordano G., Varotti E., Brigati F., Beretta R.: “The value of peritoneal washing cytology during intra-abdominal surgery for female genital tract”. Clin. Genitourinary. Can., 2014, 12, e95.

[35] Stewart C.J., Doherty D.A., Havlat M, Koay M.H., Leung Y.C., Naran A., et al.: “Transtubal spread of endometrial carcinoma: correlation of intra-luminal tumour cells with tumour grade, peritoneal fluid cytology, and extrauteruterine metastasis”. Pathology, 2013, 45, 382.

[36] Machida H., Maeda M., Cahoon S.S., Scanel C.A., Garcia-Sayre J., Roman L.D., Matsuo K.: “Endometrial cancer arising in adenomyosis versus endometrial cancer coexisting with adenomyosis: are these two different entites?’’ Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2017, 295, 1459.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top