Article Data

  • Views 544
  • Dowloads 152

Original Research

Open Access

Epithelial borderline ovarian tumors: clinicopathological characteristics, management options, and diagnostic role of intraoperative consultation

  • F. Atalay1,*,
  • K. Cetinkaya1

1Department of Gynecology, Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankar, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4591.2018 Vol.39,Issue 6,December 2018 pp.988-991

Published: 15 December 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): F. Atalay E-mail: atalayfundak@yahoo.com

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the present study was to evaluate clinicopathological and surgical features, accuracy of frozen section in patients with serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) treated in this clinic. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for BOTs at Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital between 2008 and 2015 was performed. Data were obtained from hospital records and from the patients by phone. Fifteen patients were identified. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 38.20 ± 7.37 (27-50) years. Sixty percent of the patients in this study were under 40 years of age. At the time of diagnosis, 93.4% of the patients had Stage I disease and 6,6% of the patients had advanced-stage disease. All patients underwent surgery. Serous histology was found in 73.3% of the patients. Forty-six percent of patients underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) and 53.3% radical surgery. Conclusion: BOTs have perfect prognosis, and FSS may be applied to patients at reproductive ages desiring to protect their fertility.

Keywords

Borderline ovarian tumors; Fertility-sparing surgery; Frozen section.

Cite and Share

F. Atalay,K. Cetinkaya. Epithelial borderline ovarian tumors: clinicopathological characteristics, management options, and diagnostic role of intraoperative consultation. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(6);988-991.

References

[1] Trillsch F., Mahner S., Vettorazzi E., Woelber L., Reuss A., Baumann K.: “Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): a subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study”. Br J Cancer, 2015, 112, 660.

[2] Seong S.J., Kim da H., Kim M.K., Song T.: “Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 26, 343.

[3] Vasconcelos I., de Sousa Mendes M.: “Conservative surgery in ovarian borderline tumours: a meta-analysis with emphasis on recurrence risk”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2015, 51, 620.

[4] Morice P.: “Borderline tumors of the ovary and fertility”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2006, 42, 149.

[5] Massad L.S. Jr., Hunter V.J., Szpak C.A., Clarke-Pearson D.L., Creasman W.T.: “Epithelial ovarian cancers of low malignant potential”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 78, 1027.

[6] Gungor T., Cetinkaya N., Yalcin H., Ozdal B., Ozgu E., Baser E.: “Retrospective evaluation f borderline ovarian tumors: single center experience of 183 cases”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2015, 291, 123.

[7] Loizzi V., Selvaggi L., Leone L., Latorre D., Scardigno D., Magazzino F , Cormio G.: “Borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary: Experience of 55 patients”. Oncol. Lett., 2015, 9, 912.

[8] McCluggage W.G.: “The pathology and controversial aspects of ovarian borderline tumors”. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 2010, 22, 462.

[9] Basaran D., Salman M.C., Calis P., Ozek A., Ozgul N., Usubutun A., Yuce K.: “Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative consultation (frozen section) in borderline ovarian tumours and factors associated with misdiagnosis”. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 34, 429.

[10] Ilvan S., Ramazanoğlu R., Ulker –Akyıldız E., Calay Z., Beşe T., Oruc N.: “The accuracy of frozen section(intraoperative consultation) in the diagnosis of ovarian masses”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 97, 395.

[11] Kayıkcıoglu F., Pata O., Cengiz S., Tulunay G., Boran N., Yalvac S., Kose F.: “Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in borderline ovarian malignancy”. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., 2000, 49, 187.

[12] Mederios L.R., Rosa D.D., Edelweiss M.I., Stein A.T., Bozzetti M.C., Zelmanowicz A., et al.: “Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diognosis of ovarian tumors: a systematic quantitative review”. Int. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 15, 192.

[13] Kim J.H., Kim T.J., Park Y.G., Lee S.H., Lee C.W., Song M.J., et al.: “Clinical analysis of intra-operative frozen-section proven borderline tumors of the ovary”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 20, 176.

[14] Tinelli R., Tinelli A., Tinelli F.G., Cicinelli E., Malvasi A.: “Conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors. A review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 100, 185.

[15] Boran N., Cil A.P., Tulunay G., Ozturkoglu E., Koc S., Bulbul D., Kose M.F.: “Fertility and recurrence results of conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 97, 845.

[16] Kristensen G.S., Schledermann D., Mogensen O., Jockhumsen K.M.: “The value of random biopsies, omentectomy, and hysterectomy in operations for borderline ovarian tumors”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 874.

[17] Harter P., Gerhenson D., Lhomme C., Lecuru F., Ledermann J., Provencher D.M., et al.: “Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup(GCIG) consensus review for ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (borderline ovarian tumors)”. Int. J. Gynecol. Oncol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 5.

[18] Kleppe M., Bruls J., Van Gorp T., Massuger L., Slangen B.F., Van de Vijver K.K., et al.: “Mucinous borderline tumours of the ovary and the appendix: a retrospective study and overview of the literature”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 133, 155.

[19] Romagnolo C., Gadduci A., Sartori E., Zola P., Maggino T.: “Management of borderline ovarian tumors: Results of an Italian multicenter study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 101, 255.

[20] Hannibal C.G., Vang R., Junge J., Frederiksen K., Kjaerbye-Thygesen A., Andersen K.K., et al.: “A nationwide study of serous “borderline” ovarian tumors in Denmark 1978-2002: centralized pathology review and overall survival compared with the general population”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 134, 267.

[21] Ziari K., Soleymani E., Alizadeh K.: “Survival analysis and prognosis for patients with serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: 14-year experience from a tertiary center in Iran”. Acta Med. Iran, 2015, 53, 199.

[22] Kane A., Uzan C., Rey A., Gouy S., Camatte S., Pautier P., et al.: “Prognostic factors in patients with ovarian serous low malignant potential (borderline)tumors with peritoneal implants”. Oncologist, 2009, 14, 591.

[23] Seidman J.D., Kurman R.J.: “Ovarian serous borderline tumors: a critical review of the literature with emphasis on prognostic indicators”. Hum. Pathol., 2000, 31, 539.

[24] Gershenson D.M., Silva E.G., Levy L., Burke T.W., Wolf J.K., Tornos C.: “Ovarian serous borderline tumors with invasive peritoneal implants”. Cancer, 1998, 82, 1096.

[25] Silva E.G., Gershenson D.M., Malpica A., Deavers M.: “The recurrence and the overall survival rates of ovarian serous borderline neoplasms with noninvasive implants in time dependent”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2006, 11, 1367.

[26] Guvenal T., Dursun P., Hasdemir P.S., Hanhan M., Guven S., Yetimalar H., et al.: “Effect of surgical staging on 539 patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 131, 546.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top