Article Data

  • Views 2172
  • Dowloads 155

Original Research

Open Access

Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplastic outcome after primary treatment with low-dose methotrexate from 2005 to 2017

  • Z. Shen1,†
  • Y. Zhou1,*,†,
  • C. Zhu1
  • L. Qian1
  • W. Song1
  • J. Wang1
  • H. Liu1
  • D. Feng2
  • B. Ling2
  • X. Zhang1
  • D. Wu1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4604.2019 Vol.40,Issue 5,October 2019 pp.770-774

Accepted: 31 January 2018

Published: 10 October 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Zhou E-mail: caddie1234@gmail.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent methotrexate (MTX) regimen applied to patients treated in Anhui provincial hospital with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LR-GTN). Materials and Methods: Between 2005 and 2017, on the basis of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2000) criteria for staging and scoring system, 66 patients with LR-GTN were treated with single-agent MTX. The authors describe their clinical characteristics, resistance/remission/recurrence rates, and treatment toxicity. Results: All patients achieved remission and maintained disease-free status until the moment of analysis. The five-day MTX protocol can achieve a 63.6% remission rate. Resistance to this regimen was obviously related with age and higher pre-treatment hCG. Severe blood toxicity (grade 3 or 4) was shown in four (6.1%) of 66 cases, of which one (1.5%) case was grade 4. Conclusions: For patients diagnosed with LR-GTN, a five-day MTX regimen is an appropriate treatment associating a low rate of toxicity to a high rate of remission.

Keywords

2000 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics scoring; Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; Methotrexate; Efficacy; Toxicity

Cite and Share

Z. Shen,Y. Zhou,C. Zhu,L. Qian,W. Song,J. Wang,H. Liu,D. Feng,B. Ling,X. Zhang,D. Wu. Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplastic outcome after primary treatment with low-dose methotrexate from 2005 to 2017. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(5);770-774.

References

[1] Essel K.G., Bruegl A., Gershenson D.M., Ramondetta L.M., Naumann R.W., Brown J.: “Salvage chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: utility or futility?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 74, 146.

[2] Kong Y., Yang J., Jiang F., Zhao J., Ren T., Li J.: “Clinical characteristics and prognosis of ultra high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients: Aretrospective cohort study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 81, 146.

[3] Seckl M.J., Sebire N.J., Fisher R.A., Golfier F., Massuger L., Sessa C.: “Gestational trophoblastic disease: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann. Oncol., 2013, 39, 24.

[4] Stevens F.T., Katzorke N., Tempfer C., Kreimer U., Bizjak G.I., Fleisch M.C., Fehm T.N.: “Gestational Trophoblastic Disorders: An Update in 2015”. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2015, 1043, 75.

[5] Froeling F.E., Seckl M.J.: “Gestational trophoblastic tumours: an update for 2014”. Curr. Oncol. Rep., 2014, 408, 16.

[6] Miller C.R., CaitlinSledge N.P., LeathIII C.A., Phippen N.T., Havrilesky L.J., Barnett J.C.: “Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 125, 144.

[7] Kohorn E.I.: “The new FIGO 2000 staging and risk factor scoring system for gestational trophoblastic disease: description and critical assessment”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2001, 73, 11.

[8] Yarandi F., Eftekhar Z., Shojaei H., Kanani S., Sharifi A., Hanjani P.: “Pulse methotrexate versus pulse actinomycin D in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2008, 33, 103.

[9] Liu E., Nealon E., Klausner R.: “Perspective from the National Cancer Institute (NCI)”. Breast Dis., 1998, 29, 10.

[10] Ngan H.Y.: “The practicability of FIGO 2000 staging for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2004, 202, 14.

[11] Ngan H.Y., Bender H., Benedet J.L., Jones H., Montruccoli G.C., Pecorelli S.: “Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2003, 175, 83.

[12] Lee Y.J., Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Suh D.S., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., et al.: “Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate and actinomycin D as first-line single chemotherapy agents in low risk gestational trophoblastic disease”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 8, 28.

[13] Turkmen O., Basaran D., Karalok A., Kimyon G.C., Tasci T., Ureyen I., et al.: “Factors related to treatment outcomes in low-risk gestational neoplasia”. Tumori, 2017, 177, 103.

[14] Verhoef L., Baartz D., Morrison S., Sanday K., Garrett A.J.: “Outcomes of women diagnosed and treated for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at the Queensland Trophoblast Centre (QTC)”. Aust. N. z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2017, 458, 57.

[15] Hammond C.B, Weed J.J., Currie J.L.: “The role of operation in the current therapy of gestational trophoblastic disease.” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1980, 844, 136.

[16] Lurain J.R., Brewer J.I., Torok E.E., Halpern B.: “Gestational trophoblastic disease: treatment results at the Brewer Trophoblastic Disease Center”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1982, 354, 60.

[17] Mousavi A., Cheraghi F., Yarandi F., Gilani M.M., Shojaei H.: “Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D versus 5-day methotrexate for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2012, 39, 116.

[18] Soper J.T., Clarke-Pearson D.L., Berchuck A., Rodriguez G., Hammond C.B.: “5-day methotrexate for women with metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, 76, 54.

[19] Lurain J.R., Chapman-Davis E., Hoekstra A.V., Schink J.C.: “Actinomycin D for methotrexate-failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. J. Reprod. Med., 2012, 283, 57.

[20] Lurain J.R., Elfstrand E.P.: “Single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy for the treatment of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 574, 172.

[21] Chapman-Davis E., Hoekstra A.V., Rademaker A.W., Schink J.C., Lurain J.R.: “Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic lowrisk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 572, 125.

[22] McNeish I.A., Strickland S., Holden L., Rustin G.J., Foskett M., Seckl M.J., Newlands E.S.: “Low-risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: outcome after initial treatment with low-dose methotrexate and folinic acid from 1992 to 2000”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2002, 1838, 20.

[23] You B., Harvey R., Henin E., Mitchell H., Golfier F., Savage P.M., et al.: “Early prediction of treatment resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia using population kinetic modelling of hCG measurements”. Br. J. Cancer, 2013, 1810, 108.

[24] El-Helw L.M., Coleman R.E., Everard J.E., Tidy J.A., Horsman J.M., Elkhenini H.F., Hancock B.W.: “Impact of the revised FIGO/WHO system on the management of patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 306, 113.

[25] Chalouhi G.E., Golfier F., Soignon P., Massardier J., Guastalla J.P., Trillet-Lenoir V., Schott A.M., Raudrant D.: “Methotrexate for 2000 FIGO low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients: efficacy and toxicity”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 643, 200.

[26] McGrath S., Short D., Harvey R., Schmid P., Savage P.M., Seckl M.J.: “The management and outcome of women with post-hydatidiform mole ‘low-risk’ gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, but hCG levels in excess of 100 000 IU l(-1)”. Br. J. Cancer, 2010, 810, 102.

[27] Taylor F., Grew T., Everard J., Ellis L., Winter M.C., Tidy J., et al.: “The outcome of patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with single agent intramuscular methotrexate and oral folinic acid”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2013, 3184, 49.

[28] Sita-Lumsden A., Short D., Lindsay I., Sebire N.J., Adjogatse D., Seckl M.J., Savage P.M.: “Treatment outcomes for 618 women with gestational trophoblastic tumours following a molar pregnancy at the Charing Cross Hospital, 2000-2009”. Br. J. Cancer, 2012, 1810, 107.

[29] Gilani M.M., Yarandi F., Eftekhar Z., Hanjani P.: “Comparison of pulse methotrexate and pulse dactinomycin in the treatment of lowrisk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Aust. N. z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2005, 161, 45.

[30] Osborne R.J., Filiaci V., Schink J.C., Mannel R.S., Secord A.A., Kelley J.L., et al.: “Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 825, 29.

[31] Seckl M.J., Sebire N.J., Berkowitz R.S.: “Gestational trophoblastic disease”. Lancet, 2010, 717, 376.

[32] Golfier F., Frappart L., Schott A.M., Raudrant D.: “Aplea for the creation of trophoblastic disease reference centers in France”. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris), 2000, 538, 29.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top