Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplastic outcome after primary treatment with low-dose methotrexate from 2005 to 2017
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4604.2019 Vol.40,Issue 5,October 2019 pp.770-774
Accepted: 31 January 2018
Published: 10 October 2019
*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Zhou E-mail: caddie1234@gmail.com
† These authors contributed equally.
Purpose: To retrospectively assess the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent methotrexate (MTX) regimen applied to patients treated in Anhui provincial hospital with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LR-GTN). Materials and Methods: Between 2005 and 2017, on the basis of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2000) criteria for staging and scoring system, 66 patients with LR-GTN were treated with single-agent MTX. The authors describe their clinical characteristics, resistance/remission/recurrence rates, and treatment toxicity. Results: All patients achieved remission and maintained disease-free status until the moment of analysis. The five-day MTX protocol can achieve a 63.6% remission rate. Resistance to this regimen was obviously related with age and higher pre-treatment hCG. Severe blood toxicity (grade 3 or 4) was shown in four (6.1%) of 66 cases, of which one (1.5%) case was grade 4. Conclusions: For patients diagnosed with LR-GTN, a five-day MTX regimen is an appropriate treatment associating a low rate of toxicity to a high rate of remission.
2000 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics scoring; Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; Methotrexate; Efficacy; Toxicity
Z. Shen,Y. Zhou,C. Zhu,L. Qian,W. Song,J. Wang,H. Liu,D. Feng,B. Ling,X. Zhang,D. Wu. Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplastic outcome after primary treatment with low-dose methotrexate from 2005 to 2017. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(5);770-774.
[1] Essel K.G., Bruegl A., Gershenson D.M., Ramondetta L.M., Naumann R.W., Brown J.: “Salvage chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: utility or futility?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 74, 146.
[2] Kong Y., Yang J., Jiang F., Zhao J., Ren T., Li J.: “Clinical characteristics and prognosis of ultra high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients: Aretrospective cohort study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 81, 146.
[3] Seckl M.J., Sebire N.J., Fisher R.A., Golfier F., Massuger L., Sessa C.: “Gestational trophoblastic disease: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann. Oncol., 2013, 39, 24.
[4] Stevens F.T., Katzorke N., Tempfer C., Kreimer U., Bizjak G.I., Fleisch M.C., Fehm T.N.: “Gestational Trophoblastic Disorders: An Update in 2015”. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2015, 1043, 75.
[5] Froeling F.E., Seckl M.J.: “Gestational trophoblastic tumours: an update for 2014”. Curr. Oncol. Rep., 2014, 408, 16.
[6] Miller C.R., CaitlinSledge N.P., LeathIII C.A., Phippen N.T., Havrilesky L.J., Barnett J.C.: “Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 125, 144.
[7] Kohorn E.I.: “The new FIGO 2000 staging and risk factor scoring system for gestational trophoblastic disease: description and critical assessment”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2001, 73, 11.
[8] Yarandi F., Eftekhar Z., Shojaei H., Kanani S., Sharifi A., Hanjani P.: “Pulse methotrexate versus pulse actinomycin D in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2008, 33, 103.
[9] Liu E., Nealon E., Klausner R.: “Perspective from the National Cancer Institute (NCI)”. Breast Dis., 1998, 29, 10.
[10] Ngan H.Y.: “The practicability of FIGO 2000 staging for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2004, 202, 14.
[11] Ngan H.Y., Bender H., Benedet J.L., Jones H., Montruccoli G.C., Pecorelli S.: “Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2003, 175, 83.
[12] Lee Y.J., Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Suh D.S., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., et al.: “Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate and actinomycin D as first-line single chemotherapy agents in low risk gestational trophoblastic disease”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 8, 28.
[13] Turkmen O., Basaran D., Karalok A., Kimyon G.C., Tasci T., Ureyen I., et al.: “Factors related to treatment outcomes in low-risk gestational neoplasia”. Tumori, 2017, 177, 103.
[14] Verhoef L., Baartz D., Morrison S., Sanday K., Garrett A.J.: “Outcomes of women diagnosed and treated for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at the Queensland Trophoblast Centre (QTC)”. Aust. N. z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2017, 458, 57.
[15] Hammond C.B, Weed J.J., Currie J.L.: “The role of operation in the current therapy of gestational trophoblastic disease.” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1980, 844, 136.
[16] Lurain J.R., Brewer J.I., Torok E.E., Halpern B.: “Gestational trophoblastic disease: treatment results at the Brewer Trophoblastic Disease Center”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1982, 354, 60.
[17] Mousavi A., Cheraghi F., Yarandi F., Gilani M.M., Shojaei H.: “Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D versus 5-day methotrexate for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2012, 39, 116.
[18] Soper J.T., Clarke-Pearson D.L., Berchuck A., Rodriguez G., Hammond C.B.: “5-day methotrexate for women with metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, 76, 54.
[19] Lurain J.R., Chapman-Davis E., Hoekstra A.V., Schink J.C.: “Actinomycin D for methotrexate-failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. J. Reprod. Med., 2012, 283, 57.
[20] Lurain J.R., Elfstrand E.P.: “Single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy for the treatment of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 574, 172.
[21] Chapman-Davis E., Hoekstra A.V., Rademaker A.W., Schink J.C., Lurain J.R.: “Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic lowrisk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 572, 125.
[22] McNeish I.A., Strickland S., Holden L., Rustin G.J., Foskett M., Seckl M.J., Newlands E.S.: “Low-risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: outcome after initial treatment with low-dose methotrexate and folinic acid from 1992 to 2000”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2002, 1838, 20.
[23] You B., Harvey R., Henin E., Mitchell H., Golfier F., Savage P.M., et al.: “Early prediction of treatment resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia using population kinetic modelling of hCG measurements”. Br. J. Cancer, 2013, 1810, 108.
[24] El-Helw L.M., Coleman R.E., Everard J.E., Tidy J.A., Horsman J.M., Elkhenini H.F., Hancock B.W.: “Impact of the revised FIGO/WHO system on the management of patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 306, 113.
[25] Chalouhi G.E., Golfier F., Soignon P., Massardier J., Guastalla J.P., Trillet-Lenoir V., Schott A.M., Raudrant D.: “Methotrexate for 2000 FIGO low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients: efficacy and toxicity”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 643, 200.
[26] McGrath S., Short D., Harvey R., Schmid P., Savage P.M., Seckl M.J.: “The management and outcome of women with post-hydatidiform mole ‘low-risk’ gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, but hCG levels in excess of 100 000 IU l(-1)”. Br. J. Cancer, 2010, 810, 102.
[27] Taylor F., Grew T., Everard J., Ellis L., Winter M.C., Tidy J., et al.: “The outcome of patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with single agent intramuscular methotrexate and oral folinic acid”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2013, 3184, 49.
[28] Sita-Lumsden A., Short D., Lindsay I., Sebire N.J., Adjogatse D., Seckl M.J., Savage P.M.: “Treatment outcomes for 618 women with gestational trophoblastic tumours following a molar pregnancy at the Charing Cross Hospital, 2000-2009”. Br. J. Cancer, 2012, 1810, 107.
[29] Gilani M.M., Yarandi F., Eftekhar Z., Hanjani P.: “Comparison of pulse methotrexate and pulse dactinomycin in the treatment of lowrisk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia”. Aust. N. z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2005, 161, 45.
[30] Osborne R.J., Filiaci V., Schink J.C., Mannel R.S., Secord A.A., Kelley J.L., et al.: “Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 825, 29.
[31] Seckl M.J., Sebire N.J., Berkowitz R.S.: “Gestational trophoblastic disease”. Lancet, 2010, 717, 376.
[32] Golfier F., Frappart L., Schott A.M., Raudrant D.: “Aplea for the creation of trophoblastic disease reference centers in France”. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris), 2000, 538, 29.
Top