Article Data

  • Views 519
  • Dowloads 136

Original Research

Open Access

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer: our technique and experience

  • D. Limbachiya1,*,
  • P. Gandhi2
  • M. Kenkre1
  • S. Shah1
  • H. Chawla1
  • G. Agrawal1
  • S. Sonara1

1Advanced Endoscopy and Oncology Centre, EVA Women Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat (India)

2Department of Gynaecology, Scunthorpe General Hospital, Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Scunthorpe (United Kingdom)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4660.2019 Vol.40,Issue 3,June 2019 pp.394-401

Published: 10 June 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): D. Limbachiya E-mail: drdipaklimbachya@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To describe our technique of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in cervical cancer and share our experience. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of 53 non-consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IA2 (n=1), IB1 (n=26), and IB2 (n=26) cervical cancer. All patients underwent total LRH with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Harmonic shears were the primary instrument used for the dissection, transection, and maintenance of hemostasis. Hemostasis was also achieved using bipolar graspers if deemed necessary. This study was approved by the local institutional review board (Sangini Hospital Ethics Committee), IRB registration number IRB00008709. Results: The median age was 47 (range, 28-70) years, with a median body mass index of 25.7 (range, 16- 32) kg/m2 . The median operative time was 103 (range, 61-150) minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. Median blood loss was 30 (range 20-135) mL. None of the cases required conversion to laparotomy. Postoperative complication rate was seen in 18 (34%) patients. Urinary dysfunction was the most common postoperative complication seen in 13 (24.5%) patients. The median number of pelvic nodes resected was 20 (range, 8-55). The surgical margins were free of disease in all cases. The median length of stay was four (range, 2-8) days. Thirty-five patients required adjuvant therapy post surgery. The median follow-up in this study was 38 (range 0-97) months. Recurrence of the disease was seen in three patients. Four patients expired. The estimated three-year overall survival rate was 92.6% in patients with disease ≤ IB1 and 92.3% in those > IB1. Conclusion: The present technique of LRH is safe, feasible, and associated with less morbidity. It is associated with minimal intraoperative complications, blood loss, shorter operative time, and outcomes comparable to other studies. The present technique consists of simple steps, which are easily reproducible and replicable once the learning curve has been surpassed.

Keywords

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; Cervical cancer; Pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Cite and Share

D. Limbachiya,P. Gandhi,M. Kenkre,S. Shah,H. Chawla,G. Agrawal,S. Sonara. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer: our technique and experience. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(3);394-401.

References

[1] Canis M., Mage G., Wattiez A., Pouly J.L., Manhes H., Bruhat M.A.: “Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri”. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod., 1990, 19, 921.

[2] Nezhat C.R., Burrell M.O., Nezhat F.R., Benigno B.B., Welander C.E.: “Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1992, 166, 864.

[3] Salicrú S.R., de la Torre J.F., Gil-Moreno A.: “The surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 25, 312.

[4] Hong J.H., Choi J.S., Lee J.H., Eom J.M., Ko J.H, Bea J.W., Park J.H.: “Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2- IIA cervical cancer?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 127, 102.

[5] Yan X., Li G., Shang H., Wang G., Chen L., Han Y.: “Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy– experience of 117 patients”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2009, 19, 963.

[6] Querleu D., Morrow C.P.: “Classification of radical hysterectomy”. Lancet Oncol., 2008, 9, 297.

[7] Malzoni M., Tinelli R., Cosentino F., Perone C., Vicario V.: “Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2007, 14, 584.

[8] Puntambekar S.P., Palep R.J., Puntambekar S.S., Wagh G.N., Patil A.M., Nayate N.V., Agrawal G.A.: “Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2007, 14, 682.

[9] Yang L., Cai J., Dong W., Shen Y., Xiong Z., Wang H., et al.: “ Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy can be routinely used for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a single-institute experience with 404 patients”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2015, 22, 199.

[10] Bristow R.E.: “Section II: Gynecologic Oncology: Radical abdominal hysterectomy”. In: Cundiff G.W., Azziz R., Bristow R.E. Te Linde’s Atlas of Gynaecologic Surgery. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013, 79.

[11] Lin Y.S.: “Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer”. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol., 2003, 10, 80.

[12] Gil-Moreno A., Puig O., Perez-Benavente M.A., Diaz B., Verges R., De la Torre J., et al.: “Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2005, 12, 113.

[13] Kim D.H., Moon, J.S.: “Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early, invasive cervical carcinoma”. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 1998, 5, 411.

[14] Yan X., Li G., Shang H., Lin F., Yang X., Zheng F.: “Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol Cancer, 2012, 22, 286.

[15] Pellegrino A, Vizza E, Fruscio R, Villa A., Corrado G., Villa M., et al.: “Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2009, 35, 98.

[16] Pareja R., Nick A.M., Schmeler K.M., Frumovitz M., Soliman P.T., Buitrago C.A., et al.: “Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries: A comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 125, 326.

[17] Yan X., Li G., Shang H., Wang G., Han Y., Lin T., Zheng F.: “Twelve-year experience with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 120, 362.

[18] Panici P.B., Scambia G., Baiocchi G., Greggi S., Mancuso S.: “Technique and feasibility of radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynaecologic malignancies: a prospective study”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1991, 1, 133.

[19] Li, G., Yan, X., Shang, H. Wang G., Chen L., Han Y.: “A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 176.

[20] Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Ballon, S.C.: “Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2002, 187, 340.

[21] Malzoni M., Tinelli R., Cosentino F., Perone C., Luzzolino D., Rasile M., Tinelli A.: “Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our instruments and technique”. Surg. Oncol., 2009, 18, 289.

[22] Chen Y., Xu H., Li Y., Wang D., Li J., Yuan J., Liang Z.: “The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2008, 15, 2847.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top