Article Data

  • Views 524
  • Dowloads 123

Reviews

Open Access

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial and cervical cancer: current and controversial issues

  • T. Tantitamit1
  • K.-G. Huang2,*,

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhonnayok (Thailand)

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kweishan, Taoyuan ,Taiwan(China)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4664.2019 Vol.40,Issue 6,December 2019 pp.919-924

Published: 10 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): K.-G. Huang E-mail: kghuang@ms57.hinet.net

Abstract

The authors review the controversial issues regarding the management algorithms, the impact of ultrastaging to adjuvant treatment, and outcomes from the role of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in endometrial cancer (EC) and cervical cancer (CC). According to standard recommendation, side specific nodal resection is required in case of failed mapping. Alternative algorithms were proposed to reduce overtreatment in low risk EC and CC. The positive results of new algorithms may lead to a proper selection of patients in which pelvic lymphadenectomy could be avoided. Ultrastaging had an impact on accuracy by increasing the detection rate by 25-50%. Occult LN metastasis was associated with myometrial invasion in EC, but the relationships between other known factors of CC recurrence are un-clear. Prognosis for the patient with either EC or CC in SLN algorithm group was similar to those in the lymphadenectomy group while the latter group had shown a higher surgical morbidity.

Keywords

Algorithm; Cervical cancer; Endometrial cancer; Outcome; Sentinel lymph node; Ultrastaging.

Cite and Share

T. Tantitamit,K.-G. Huang. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial and cervical cancer: current and controversial issues. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(6);919-924.

References

[1] National Comprehensive Cancer Network: “Uterine Neoplasm (Ver-sion 1.2018)”. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf

[2] Barlin J.N., Khoury-Collado F., Kim C.H., Leitao M.M, Jr., Chi D.S., Sonoda Y., et al.: “The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes”. Gynecol Oncol., 2012, 125, 531.

[3] Sinno A.K., Peijnenburg E., Fader A.N., Temkin S.M., Stone R., Levinson K., et al.: ”Reducing overtreatment: A comparison of lymph node assessment strategies for endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 143, 281.

[4] Tanner E., Puechl A., Levinson K., Havrilesky L.J., Sinno A., Secord A. A., et al.: “Use of a novel sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm reduces the need for pelvic lymphadenectomy in low-grade endome-trial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 147, 535.

[5] Cormier B, Diaz JP, Shih K, Sampson RM, Sonoda Y, Park KJ, et al.: “Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer”. Gynecol Oncol., 2011, 122, 275.

[6] National Comprehensive Cancer Network: “Cervical Cancer (Ver-sion 1.2017)”. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf.

[7] Fagotti A., Pedone Anchora L., Conte C., Chiantera V., Vizza E., Tor-torella L., et al.: “Beyond sentinel node algorithm. Toward a more tailored surgery for cervical cancer patients”. Cancer Med., 2016, 5, 1725.

[8] Ferrandina G., Pedone Anchora L., Gallotta V., Fagotti A., Vizza E., Chiantera V., et al.: “Can We Define the Risk of Lymph Node Metas-tasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients? A Large-Scale, Ret-rospective Study”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2017, 24, 2311.

[9] Ballester M., Dubernard G., Lecuru F., Heitz D., Mathevet P., Marret H., et al.: “Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO)”. Lancet Oncol., 2011, 12, 469.

[10] Khoury-Collado F., Murray M.P., Hensley M.L., Sonoda Y., Alektiar K. M., Levine D.A., et al.: “Sentinel lymph node mapping for en-dometrial cancer improves the detection of metastatic disease to re-gional lymph nodes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 122, 251.

[11] Desai P.H., Hughes P., Tobias D.H., Tchabo N., Heller P.B., Dise C., et al.: “Accuracy of robotic sentinel lymph node detection (RSLND) for patients with endometrial cancer (EC)”. Gynecol Oncol. 2014, 135, 196.

[12] Naoura I., Canlorbe G., Bendifallah S., Ballester M., Darai E.: “Rel-evance of sentinel lymph node procedure for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 136, 60.

[13] Hagen B., Valla M., Aune G., Ravlo M., Abusland A.B., Araya E., et al.: “Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging of lymph nodes dur-ing robotic-assisted laparoscopic operation for endometrial cancer. A prospective validation study using a sentinel lymph node surgical algorithm”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 143, 479.

[14] How J., Gotlieb W.H., Press J.Z., Abitbol J., Pelmus M., Ferenczy A., et al.: “Comparing indocyanine green, technetium, and blue dye for sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 137, 436.

[15] Liu C.Y., Elias K.M., Howitt B.E., Lee L.J., Feltmate C.M.: “Sentinel lymph node mapping reduces practice pattern variations in surgical staging for endometrial adenocarcinoma: A before and after study:. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 145, 248.

[16] Paley P.J., Veljovich D.S., Press J.Z., Isacson C., Pizer E., Shah C.: “A prospective investigation of fluorescence imaging to detect sen-tinel lymph nodes at robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 215, 117.

[17] Altgassen C., Muller N., Hornemann A., Kavallaris A., Hornung D., Diedrich K., et al.: “Immunohistochemical workup of sentinel nodes in endometrial cancer improves diagnostic accuracy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 114, 284.

[18] Abu-Rustum NR.: “Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: a modern approach to surgical staging”. J. Nat. Compr. Canc. Netw., 2014, 12, 288.

[19] Cibula D., Zikan M., Slama J., Fischerova D., Kocian R., Germanova A., et al.: “Risk of micrometastases in non-sentinel pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 143, 83.

[20] Kim C.H., Soslow R.A., Park K.J., Barber E.L., Khoury-Collado F., Barlin J.N., et al.: “Pathologic ultrastaging improves micrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes during endometrial cancer stag-ing”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 964.

[21] Erkanli S., Bolat F., Seydaoglu G.: “Detection and importance of mi-crometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes in endometrial carcinoma”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2011, 32, 619.

[22] McCoy A., Finan M.A., Boudreaux F.T., Tucker J.A., Lazarchick J..J., Donnell R.M., et al.: “The incidence and clinical significance of lymph node micrometastases determined by immunohistochemi-924 cal staining in stage I - lymph node negative endometrial cancer”. Histol. Histopathol., 2012, 27, 181.

[23] St Clair C.M., Eriksson A.G., Ducie J.A., Jewell E.L., Alektiar K.M., Hensley M.L., et al.: “Low-Volume Lymph Node Metastasis Dis-covered During Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Carcinoma”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2016, 23, 1653.

[24] Plante M., Stanleigh J., Renaud M.C., Sebastianelli A., Grondin K., Gregoire J.: “Isolated tumor cells identified by sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Does adjuvant treatment matter?” Gynecol Oncol., 2017, 146, 240.

[25] Todo Y., Kato H., Okamoto K., Minobe S., Yamashiro K., Sakuragi N.: “Isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in regional lymph nodes in stage I to II endometrial cancer”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 27, e1.

[26] Wu Y., Li Z., Wu H., Yu J.: “Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis”. Mol. Clin. Oncol., 2013, 1, 1025.

[27] Lentz S.E., Muderspach L.I., Felix J.C., Ye W., Groshen S., Amezcua C. A.: “Identification of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of early-stage cervical cancer patients”. Obstet. Gy-necol., 2004, 103, 1204.

[28] Stany M.P., Stone P.J., Felix J.C., Amezcua C.A., Groshen S., Ye W., et al.: “Lymph Node Micrometastases in Early-Stage Cervical Can-cer are Not Predictive of Survival”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2015, 34, 379.

[29] Colturato L.F., Signorini Filho R.C., Fernandes R.C., Gebrim L.H., Oliani A.H.: “Lymph node micrometastases in initial stage cervical cancer and tumoral recurrence”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2016, 133, 69.

[30] Cibula D., Abu-Rustum N.R., Dusek L., Slama J., Zikan M., Zaal A., et al.: “Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: Lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 127, 462.

[31] Horn L.C., Hentschel B., Fischer U., Peter D., Bilek K.: “Detection of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes in patients with carcinoma of the cervix uteri using step sectioning: Frequency, topographic dis-tribution and prognostic impact”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 276.

[32] Leitao M.M., Jr., Khoury-Collado F., Gardner G., Sonoda Y., Brown C. L., Alektiar KM, et al.: “Impact of incorporating an algorithm that utilizes sentinel lymph node mapping during minimally invasive pro-cedures on the detection of stage IIIC endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 129, 38.

[33] Dari E, Dubernard G., Bats A.S., Heitz D., Mathevet P., Marret H., et al.: “Sentinel node biopsy for the management of early stage en-dometrial cancer: long-term results of the SENTI-ENDO study”. Gy-necol. Oncol., 2015, 136, 54.

[34] Zahl Eriksson A.G., Ducie J., Ali N., McGree M.E., Weaver A.L., Bogani G., et al.: “Comparison of a sentinel lymph node and a se-lective lymphadenectomy algorithm in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and limited myometrial invasion”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 140, 394.

[35] Lennox G.K., Covens A.: “Can sentinel lymph node biopsy replace pelvic lymphadenectomy for early cervical cancer?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 144, 16.

[36] Mathevet P., Lecuru F., Magaud L., Bouttitie F.: “Sentinel lymph node biopsy for early cervical cancer: Results of a randomized prospective, multicenter study (Senticol 2) comparing adding pelvic lymph node dissection vs sentinel node biopsy only”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 145, 2.

[37] Niikura H., Okamoto S., Otsuki T., Yoshinaga K., Utsunomiya H., Nagase S., et al.: “Prospective study of sentinel lymph node biopsy without further pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-negative cervical cancer. International journal of gyne-cological cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer., 2012, 22, 1244.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top