Article Data

  • Views 515
  • Dowloads 108

Original Research

Open Access

Surgical staging and differential protein expression in endometrial cancers

  • M. F. Benoit1,*,

1Kaiser Permanente Washington, Bellevue, WA, USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4669.2018 Vol.39,Issue 6,December 2018 pp.859-866

Published: 15 December 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): M. F. Benoit E-mail: benoit.m@ghc.org

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: The benefit of comprehensive surgical staging in type I versus type II tumors is investigated and translationally associated with differentially expressed proteins. Materials and Methods: A single institutional database was queried for all uterine cancer patients and sample data was abstracted. Proteins identified from microarray data were further investigated at the immunohistochemical (IHC) level and correlated with sample data. Results: Lymph node dissection did not result in a survival benefit for either type I or type II uterine cancer. L1CAM is differentially expressed between tumor types. GRB7 was found to correlate with stage in type II cancers. Thrombomodulin was expressed at higher levels in all lymph node (LN) positive cancers. Conclusions: LN dissection did not provide a therapeutic benefit in endometrial cancers, especially type II cancers. Protein correlations with stage and histology demonstrate specific biologic profiles. Novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets for differentially expressed tumor proteins are identified.

Keywords

Immunohistochemistry; Lymph node; Uterine cancer.

Cite and Share

M. F. Benoit. Surgical staging and differential protein expression in endometrial cancers. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(6);859-866.

References

[1] Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A.: “American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018”. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2018.

[2] Mendivil A., Schuler K.M., Gehrig P.A.: “Non endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus: a review of selected histological subtypes”. Cancer Control, 2009, 16, 46.

[3] Hendrickson M., Ross J., Eifel P., Martinez A., Kempson R.: “Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: a highly malignant form of endometrial adenocarcinoma”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 1982, 6, 93.

[4] Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M.K.: “Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.

[5] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G., et al.: “Systemic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[6] Goff B.A.: “Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: What have we learned over the past quarter century?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 98, 341.

[7] Kelly M.G., O’Mally D.M., Hui P., McAlpine J., Yu H., Rutherford T.J., et al.: “Improved survival in surgical stage I patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (USPC) treated with adjuvant platinum- based chemotherapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 98, 353.

[8] Risinger J.I., Maxwell G.L., Chandramouli G.V., Jazaeri A., Aprelikova O., Patterson T., et al.: “Microarray analysis reveals distinct gene expression profiles among different histologic types of endometrial cancer”. Cancer Res., 2003, 63, 6.

[9] Santin A.D., Zhan F., Cane’ S., Bellone S., Palmieri M., Thomas M., et al.: “Gene expression fingerprint of uterine serous papillary carcinoma: identification of novel molecular markers for uterine serous cancer diagnosis and therapy”. Br. J. Cancer, 2005, 92, 1561.

[10] Santin A.D., Diamandis E.P., Bellone S., Marizzoni M., Bandiera E., Palmieri M., et al.: “Overexpression of kallikrein 10 (hK10) in uterine serous papillary carcinomas”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 194, 1296.

[11] Konecny E., Agarwal R., Keeney G.A., Winterhoff B., Jones M.B., Mariani A., et al.: “Claudin-3 and claudin-4 expression in serous papillary, clear-cell, and endometrioid endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 263.

[12] Morrison C., Zanagnolo V., Ramirez N., Cohn D.E., Kelbick N., Copeland L., et al.: “HER-2 Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Endometrial Cancer: Association With Outcome in a Large Cohort of Surgically Staged Patients”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 2376.

[13] Havrilesky L.J., Cragun J.M., Calingaert B., Synan I., Secord A.A., Soper J.T., et al.: “Resection of lymph node metastases influences survival in stage IIIC endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 689.

[14] Chan J.K., Cheung M.K., Huh W.K., Osann K., Husain A., Teng N.N., Kapp D.S.: “Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients”. Cancer, 2006, 107, 1823.

[15] Lutman C.V., Havrilesky L.J., Cragun J.M., Secord A.A., Calingaert B., Berchuck A., et al.: “Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 102, 92.

[16] Goldstein H., Miller R.C., Abdah-Bortnyak R., Steiner M., Yildiz F., Meirovitz A., et al.: “Outcome after combined modality treatment of uterine papillary serous carcinoma: A study by the Rare Cancer Network (RCN)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 108, 298.

[17] Boo Y.J., Park J.M., Kim J., Chae Y.S., Min B.W., Um J.W., Moon H.Y.: “L1Expression as a Marker for Poor Prognosis, Tumor Progression, and Short Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2007, 14, 1703.

[18] Gavert N., Sheffer M., Raveh S., Spaderna S., Shtutman M., Brabletz T., et al.: “Expression of L1-CAM and ADAM10 in Human Colon Cancer Cells Induces Metastasis”. Cancer Res., 2007, 67, 7703.

[19] Heuberger J., Birchmeier W.: “Interplay of Cadherin-Mediated Cell Adhesion and Canonical Wnt Signaling”. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2010, 2, 1.

[20] Gutwein P., Stoeck A., Riedle S., Gast D., Runz S., Condon T.P., Marmé A., et al.: “Cleavage of L1 in exosomes and apoptotic membrane vesicles released from ovarian carcinoma cells”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2005, 11, 2492.

[21] Mechtersheimer S., Gutwein P., Agmon-Levin N., Stoeck A., Oleszewski M., Riedle S., Postina R., et al.: “Ectodomain shedding of L1 adhesion molecule promotes cell migration by autocrine binding to integrins”. J. Cell Biol., 2001, 155, 661.

[22] Vihinen P., Veli-Matti K.: “Matrix metalloproteinase’s in cancer: Prognostic markers and therapeutic targets”. Int. J. Cancer, 2002, 99, 157.

[23] Cao Q.J., Jones J.G., Li M.: “Expression of calretinin in human ovary, testis, and ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2001, 20, 346.

[24] AlHilli M.M., Podratz K.C., Dowdy S.C., Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Weaver A.L., McGree M.E., et al.: “Risk-scoring system for the individualized prediction of lymphatic dissemination in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 131, 103.

[25] Bendifallah S., Genin A.S., Naoura, I., Chabbert Buffet N., Clavel Chapelon F., Haddad B., et al.: “A nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis of presumed stage I and II endometrial cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 207, 197.e1

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top