Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Patients’ and physicians’ expectations differ significantly during the follow-up period after completion of primary treatment of gynecological or breast cancer
1Department for Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, Division of Gynecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4680.2019 Vol.40,Issue 5,October 2019 pp.781-786
Accepted: 11 April 2018
Published: 10 October 2019
*Corresponding Author(s): N. Kozar E-mail: nejc.kozar@gmail.com
Introduction: With increasing incidence, earlier detection, and better treatment of malignant diseases, the number of people with cancer is increasing. After the completion of primary treatment, patients enter the follow-up period. While numerous studies have been published regarding the influence of follow-up on survival, there is a lack of data regarding comparison of patients’ and physicians’ expectations. The aim of the study was to assess patients’ and physicians’ expectations about follow-up and evaluate potential discrepancies. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 122 patients after gynecological or breast cancer treatment at the Department of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Maribor, Slovenia, and 72 primary level gynecologists and general practitioners in the Maribor region. A questionnaire was used to compare the expectations of patients and physicians regarding the center and location of follow-up, the prognosis revealed, attitudes towards examinations, and sense of safety and stress. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were used. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: Patients consider it more important to be followed-up at the center of treatment, closest to their home, and to be exactly informed about the prognosis. Unlike their physicians, patients consider the sense of safety and stress caused by regular visits as more important, wish to have consultations with the nurse, and many of them would rather visit the physician when symptoms occur as opposed to on a regular basis. Conclusions: Given the lack of evidence-based improvement of survival with regular follow-up, in accordance with the present results, individualization of scheduling follow-up visits with the lowest acceptable frequency and intermediate nurse consultations might be associated with meeting patients’ expectations without compromising survival outcomes.
Patients’ and physicians’ expectations; Breast cancer; Follow-up
M. Pakiž,L. Lukman,N. Kozar. Patients’ and physicians’ expectations differ significantly during the follow-up period after completion of primary treatment of gynecological or breast cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(5);781-786.
[1] Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., et al.: “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012”. Int. J. Cancer, 2015, 136, E359.
[2] Zadnik V., Primic Zakelj M., Lokar K., Jarm K., Ivanus U., Zagar T.: “Cancer burden in Slovenia with the time trends analysis”. Radiol. Oncol., 2017, 51, 47.
[3] Landier W.: “Survivorship care: essential components and models of delivery”. Oncology (Williston Park), 2009, 2346. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bd9b/1ee8ab4c73f702042aab228d873 533522642.pdf
[4] “Survivorship: Integrated care model aims to cut costs, alleviate workload. The Oncology Watch: News in Review”. February 2009. Available at: https://books.google.si/booksid=WBjx4rSxIicC&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=Integrated+care+model+aims+to+cut+costs,+alleviate+workload.+The+Oncology+Watch:+News+in+Review.+February+2009&source=bl&ots=elKXECtRK6&sig=n0LdKGtmyJOGUZuD3euXHV6nBuk&hl=sl&sa=X&ved=2ahU
[5] Zola P., Macchi C., Cibula D., Colombo N., Kimmig R., Maggino T., et al.: “Follow-up in Gynecological Malignancies: A State of Art”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2015, 25, 1151.
[6] Caldas C., Yarden Y.: “Basic cancer research is essential for the success of personalized medicine”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2013, 49, 2619.
[7] Drusany K., Pavlović A., Zwitter M.: “Regular follow-up visits of cancer patients in long-term remission”. Medicinski razgledi, 2003, 42, 329. Available at: https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI: DOC-RPGL2WNS/?
[8] Leeson S.C., Beaver K., Ezendam N.P.M., Mačuks R., Martin-Hirsch P.L., Miles T., et al.: “The future for follow-up of gynaecological cancer in Europe. Summary of available data and overview of ongoing trials”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2017, 210, 376.
[9] Mayer D.K., Nekhlyudov L., Snyder C.F., Merrill J.K., Wollins D.S., Shulman L.N., “American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical expert statement on cancer survivorship care planning”. J. Oncol. Pract., 2014, 10, 345.
[10] Tompkins S.C., Ganz P.A., Vora S.R.: “Assuring quality of care for cancer survivors: The survivorship care plan”. UpToDate, Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Available at: http://www.uptodate.com (Accessed on November 8, 2017.)
[11] Grunfeld E., Julian J.A., Pond G., Maunsell E., Coyle D., Folkes A., “Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 29, 4755.
[12] van de Poll-Franse L.V., Nicolaije K.A., Vos M.C., Pijnenborg J.M., Boll D., Husson O.: “The impact of a cancer Survivorship Care Plan on gynecological cancer patient and health care provider reported outcomes (ROGY Care): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial”. Trials, 2011, 12, 256.
[13] Hershman D.L., Greenlee H., Awad D., Kalinsky K., Maurer M., Kranwinkel G., “Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2013, 138, 795.
[14] Brothers B.M., Easley A., Salani R., Andersen B.L.. “Do survivorship care plans impact patients’ evaluations of care? A randomized evaluation with gynecologic oncology patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 129, 554.
[15] “The public network of primary health care activities in the Republic of Slovenia”. Ministry of Health. 2013. Available at: http://www.mz.gov.si/fileadmin/mz.../Mreza_za_ZS_13-11-2013lektorirano.pdf
[16] Snoj Z.: “Duševne motnje ob diagnozi in spremenjena telesna samopodoba. Le ovinek na poti zǐ vljenja”. Ljubljana: Janssen-Cilag, Division of Johnson&Johnson, 2006. Available at: https://www.onkoi.si/fileadmin/onko/datoteke/dokumenti/Le_ ovinek_na_poti_zivljenjafinal.p
[17] Dernovšek M.H., Gorenc M., Jeriček H., Tavcar R.: “Stres, tesnoba in depresija pri bolnikih z rakom”. Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja RS, 2007. Available: http://www.worldcat.org/title/stres-tesnoba-in-depresija-pri-bolnikih-z-rakom/oclc/449240327#similar
[18] Borštnar S., Červek J., Ebert M.M., Kuhar Grašič C., Marinko T., Matos E., et al.: “Razsejan rak dojk”. Ljubljana: Onkološki inštitut, 2013. Available at: https://www.onko-i.si/fileadmin/onko/datoteke/dokumenti/Publikacije/Razsejan_rak_dojk.pdf
[19] Sheppard C.: “Breast cancer follow-up: Literature review and discussion”. Eur. J. Oncol. Nur., 2007, 11, 340.
[20] Stagl J.M., Lechner S.C., Carver C.S.: “A randomized controlled trial cognitive behavioral stress management and Breast Cancer: Survival and reccurence at 11-year follow up”. Rest. Treat. Breast Cancer, 2015, 154, 319.
Top