Article Data

  • Views 593
  • Dowloads 131

Original Research

Open Access

Patients’ and physicians’ expectations differ significantly during the follow-up period after completion of primary treatment of gynecological or breast cancer

  • M. Pakiž1
  • L. Lukman1
  • N. Kozar1,*,

1Department for Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, Division of Gynecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4680.2019 Vol.40,Issue 5,October 2019 pp.781-786

Accepted: 11 April 2018

Published: 10 October 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): N. Kozar E-mail: nejc.kozar@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: With increasing incidence, earlier detection, and better treatment of malignant diseases, the number of people with cancer is increasing. After the completion of primary treatment, patients enter the follow-up period. While numerous studies have been published regarding the influence of follow-up on survival, there is a lack of data regarding comparison of patients’ and physicians’ expectations. The aim of the study was to assess patients’ and physicians’ expectations about follow-up and evaluate potential discrepancies. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 122 patients after gynecological or breast cancer treatment at the Department of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Maribor, Slovenia, and 72 primary level gynecologists and general practitioners in the Maribor region. A questionnaire was used to compare the expectations of patients and physicians regarding the center and location of follow-up, the prognosis revealed, attitudes towards examinations, and sense of safety and stress. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were used. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: Patients consider it more important to be followed-up at the center of treatment, closest to their home, and to be exactly informed about the prognosis. Unlike their physicians, patients consider the sense of safety and stress caused by regular visits as more important, wish to have consultations with the nurse, and many of them would rather visit the physician when symptoms occur as opposed to on a regular basis. Conclusions: Given the lack of evidence-based improvement of survival with regular follow-up, in accordance with the present results, individualization of scheduling follow-up visits with the lowest acceptable frequency and intermediate nurse consultations might be associated with meeting patients’ expectations without compromising survival outcomes.

Keywords

Patients’ and physicians’ expectations; Breast cancer; Follow-up

Cite and Share

M. Pakiž,L. Lukman,N. Kozar. Patients’ and physicians’ expectations differ significantly during the follow-up period after completion of primary treatment of gynecological or breast cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(5);781-786.

References

[1] Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., et al.: “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012”. Int. J. Cancer, 2015, 136, E359.

[2] Zadnik V., Primic Zakelj M., Lokar K., Jarm K., Ivanus U., Zagar T.: “Cancer burden in Slovenia with the time trends analysis”. Radiol. Oncol., 2017, 51, 47.

[3] Landier W.: “Survivorship care: essential components and models of delivery”. Oncology (Williston Park), 2009, 2346. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bd9b/1ee8ab4c73f702042aab228d873 533522642.pdf

[4] “Survivorship: Integrated care model aims to cut costs, alleviate workload. The Oncology Watch: News in Review”. February 2009. Available at: https://books.google.si/booksid=WBjx4rSxIicC&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=Integrated+care+model+aims+to+cut+costs,+alleviate+workload.+The+Oncology+Watch:+News+in+Review.+February+2009&source=bl&ots=elKXECtRK6&sig=n0LdKGtmyJOGUZuD3euXHV6nBuk&hl=sl&sa=X&ved=2ahU

[5] Zola P., Macchi C., Cibula D., Colombo N., Kimmig R., Maggino T., et al.: “Follow-up in Gynecological Malignancies: A State of Art”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2015, 25, 1151.

[6] Caldas C., Yarden Y.: “Basic cancer research is essential for the success of personalized medicine”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2013, 49, 2619.

[7] Drusany K., Pavlović A., Zwitter M.: “Regular follow-up visits of cancer patients in long-term remission”. Medicinski razgledi, 2003, 42, 329. Available at: https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI: DOC-RPGL2WNS/?

[8] Leeson S.C., Beaver K., Ezendam N.P.M., Mačuks R., Martin-Hirsch P.L., Miles T., et al.: “The future for follow-up of gynaecological cancer in Europe. Summary of available data and overview of ongoing trials”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2017, 210, 376.

[9] Mayer D.K., Nekhlyudov L., Snyder C.F., Merrill J.K., Wollins D.S., Shulman L.N., “American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical expert statement on cancer survivorship care planning”. J. Oncol. Pract., 2014, 10, 345.

[10] Tompkins S.C., Ganz P.A., Vora S.R.: “Assuring quality of care for cancer survivors: The survivorship care plan”. UpToDate, Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Available at: http://www.uptodate.com (Accessed on November 8, 2017.)

[11] Grunfeld E., Julian J.A., Pond G., Maunsell E., Coyle D., Folkes A., “Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 29, 4755.

[12] van de Poll-Franse L.V., Nicolaije K.A., Vos M.C., Pijnenborg J.M., Boll D., Husson O.: “The impact of a cancer Survivorship Care Plan on gynecological cancer patient and health care provider reported outcomes (ROGY Care): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial”. Trials, 2011, 12, 256.

[13] Hershman D.L., Greenlee H., Awad D., Kalinsky K., Maurer M., Kranwinkel G., “Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2013, 138, 795.

[14] Brothers B.M., Easley A., Salani R., Andersen B.L.. “Do survivorship care plans impact patients’ evaluations of care? A randomized evaluation with gynecologic oncology patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 129, 554.

[15] “The public network of primary health care activities in the Republic of Slovenia”. Ministry of Health. 2013. Available at: http://www.mz.gov.si/fileadmin/mz.../Mreza_za_ZS_13-11-2013lektorirano.pdf

[16] Snoj Z.: “Duševne motnje ob diagnozi in spremenjena telesna samopodoba. Le ovinek na poti zǐ vljenja”. Ljubljana: Janssen-Cilag, Division of Johnson&Johnson, 2006. Available at: https://www.onkoi.si/fileadmin/onko/datoteke/dokumenti/Le_ ovinek_na_poti_zivljenjafinal.p

[17] Dernovšek M.H., Gorenc M., Jeriček H., Tavcar R.: “Stres, tesnoba in depresija pri bolnikih z rakom”. Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja RS, 2007. Available: http://www.worldcat.org/title/stres-tesnoba-in-depresija-pri-bolnikih-z-rakom/oclc/449240327#similar

[18] Borštnar S., Červek J., Ebert M.M., Kuhar Grašič C., Marinko T., Matos E., et al.: “Razsejan rak dojk”. Ljubljana: Onkološki inštitut, 2013. Available at: https://www.onko-i.si/fileadmin/onko/datoteke/dokumenti/Publikacije/Razsejan_rak_dojk.pdf

[19] Sheppard C.: “Breast cancer follow-up: Literature review and discussion”. Eur. J. Oncol. Nur., 2007, 11, 340.

[20] Stagl J.M., Lechner S.C., Carver C.S.: “A randomized controlled trial cognitive behavioral stress management and Breast Cancer: Survival and reccurence at 11-year follow up”. Rest. Treat. Breast Cancer, 2015, 154, 319.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top