Article Data

  • Views 553
  • Dowloads 136

Original Research

Open Access

Learning curve in colposcopic training among gynecologic oncology fellows

  • Y. Khongthip1
  • T. Manchana1,*,
  • S. Oranratanaphan1
  • R. Lertkhachonsuk1

1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4770.2019 Vol.40,Issue 4,August 2019 pp.647-651

Accepted: 11 June 2018

Published: 10 August 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): T. Manchana E-mail: Tarinee.M@chula.ac.th

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the learning curve of colposcopic training among gynecologic oncology fellows at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of colposcopic examinations during June 2014 -April 2017 was performed. The agreement between colposcopic impression (normal vs. low grade lesion vs. high grade lesion) and histopathology (benign vs. HPV/CIN1 vs. CIN2+) was defined as accuracy. Accuracy rate of attending staffs in the institute during the same period was used as the reference level. Cumulative mean proportion of accuracy rate at each consecutive case was plotted in graph and learning curve was generated. Result: Six hundred ninety-one patients were included. Overall accuracy rate of fellows after completion of training was comparable to the attending staffs, which was 68.1% (95% CI 63.4 - 72.4%) versus 68.0% (95% CI 61.9 -73.6%) Normal colposcopic impression correctly predicted normal histopathology in only 30.3% of cases. Colposcopic impression of low-grade and high-grade lesions correctly predicted low-and high-grade intraepithelial lesions on biopsy in 75.9% and 53.4% of cases, respectively. CIN2+ lesions were misdiagnosed in 2.9% of the patients with normal colposcopic impression and 37.2% of the patients with low-grade lesion. The learning curve showed a plateau after 50 cases at around 70% accuracy rate, which was the similar accuracy rate of attending staffs. Conclusion: Colposcopic examination is a procedure that requires comprehensive training. The minimum numbers of 50 colposcopic procedures were required to achieve optimal competency and maintain proficiency.

Keywords

Accuracy; Colposcopy; CIN; Learning curve; Training

Cite and Share

Y. Khongthip,T. Manchana,S. Oranratanaphan,R. Lertkhachonsuk. Learning curve in colposcopic training among gynecologic oncology fellows. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(4);647-651.

References

[1] International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012: “Cancer fact sheets: cervivcal cancver”. Available at: http://gco.iarc. fr/today/data/pdf/fact-sheets/cancers/cancer-fact-sheets-16.pdf

[2] Chaiwerawattana A., Sangrajrang S., Laowahutanont P., Petchlit W.: “Hospital-based cancer registry”. Bangkok: Pornsub Printing, 2017, 2.

[3] Massad L.S., Einstein M.H., Huh W.K., Katki H.A., Kinney W.K., Schiffman M., et al.: “2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 121, 829.

[4] Bornstein J., Bentley J., Bosze P., Girardi F., Haefner H., Menton M., et al.: “2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 120, 166.

[5] Collinet P., Delemer M., Jouve E., Regis C., Farine M.O., Vinatier D., et al.: “Fluorescence diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: A clinical feasability study”. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther., 2007, 4, 112.

[6] Ferris D.G., Miller M.D.: “Colposcopic accuracy in a residency training program: defining competency and proficiency”. J. Fam. Pract., 1993, 36, 515.

[7] Toglia M.R., Coburn K.M., Pearl M.L.: “Evaluation of colposcopic skills in an obstetrics and gynecology residency training program”. J. Lower Genit. Tract Dis., 1997, 1, 5.

[8] Brotzman G.L., Schellhase K.G.: “Colposcopic proficiency-disease spectrum in a single family practice colposcopists’ clinic”. WMJ, 2004, 103, 61.

[9] Baum M.E., Rader J.S., Gibb R.K., McAlister R.P., Powell M.A., Mutch D.G., et al.: “Colposcopic accuracy of obstetrics and gynecology residents”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 966.

[10] Massad L.S., Jeronimo J., Katki H.A., Schiffman M.: “The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. J. Lower Genit. Tract Dis., 2009, 13, 137.

[11] Kilic G., England J., Borahay M., Pedraza D., Freeman D., Snyder R., et al.: “Accuracy of physician and nurse practitioner colposcopy to effect improved surveillance of cervical cancer”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2012, 33, 183.

[12] Underwood M., Arbyn M., Parry-Smith W., De Bellis-Ayres S., Todd R., Redman C.W., et al.: “Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. BJOG, 2012, 119, 1293.

[13] Wright T.C. Jr., Stoler M.H., Behrens C.M., Apple R., Derion T., Wright T.L.: “The ATHENA human papillomavirus study: design, methods, and baseline results”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 206, 46.e1.

[14] Huh W.K., Sideri M., Stoler M., Zhang G., Feldman R., Behrens C.M.: “Relevance of random biopsy at the transformation zone when colposcopy is negative”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2014, 124, 670.

[15] Stewart Massad L., D’Souza G., Darragh T.M., Minkoff H., Wright R., Kassaye S., et al.: “Accuracy of colposcopy in HIV seropositive and seronegative women with abnormal Pap tests”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 135, 481.

[16] Brotzman G.L., Apgar B.S.: “Assessing colposcopic skills: the instructor’s handbook”. Fam. Med., 1998, 30, 350.

[17] Spitzer M., Apgar B.S., Brotzman G.L., Krumholz B.A.: “Residency training in colposcopy: a survey of program directors in obstetrics and gynecology and family practice”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2001, 185, 507.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top