Article Data

  • Views 510
  • Dowloads 147

Original Research

Open Access

Role of nesfatin in endometrial cancers

  • M. Szarszewska1,*,
  • J. Markowska1
  • A. Gryboś2
  • A. Marszalek3
  • V. Filas3
  • J. Żurawski4
  • M. Jóźwik5
  • A. Olejek6
  • W. Bednarek7
  • R. Mądry1
  • R. Jach8
  • A. Markowska9

1Department of Oncology, Gynaecological Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

2Department of Gyneacology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Science, wroclaw Medical University, Poland

3Department of Tumour Pathology and Prophylaxis Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland

4Department of Biology and Environmental Protections, Division of Immnobiochemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

5Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Gynaecologic Endocrinology and Obstetrics, University of warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland

6Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics and Gynaecology Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland

7Chair and Clinic of Gynaecological Oncology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland

8Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

9Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4848.2019 Vol.40,Issue 5,October 2019 pp.825-830

Accepted: 28 August 2018

Published: 10 October 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Szarszewska E-mail: monika.szarszewska@gmail.com

Abstract

Aims: Endometrial cancers (ECs) represent a heterogeneous group of cancers with different types of histology, etiology, and prognosis. The largest risk factors for EC are obesity and diabetes. Nesfatin regulates food intake and glucose homeostasis. The aim of this multicentre study was closer recognition of nesfatin and other molecular factors in ECs. Materials and Methods: Using sections of paraffinembedded preparations and immunohistochemistry, the expression of nesfatin (NESF 1), estrogen receptors (ER α and β1), and progesterone receptor (PR) was examined in 146 cancer patients (115 EC type I and 33 type II). Results: In EC type I, a higher expression of PR, but lower ER β1 was found. No significant difference was detected in NESF 1 and ER α expression between the two types of ECs. ER α expression was higher in early stages of EC, and in more advanced cases ER β1 staining was weaker. In EC types I and II, a high expression of NESF 1 correlated with a high expression of ER α. Lower nesfatin expression correlated with low cells differentiation (grading) in EC type I. A tendency towards high expression of nesfatin was noted in patients with a lack of ER β1 expression. No correlation was found between the expression of NESF 1 and PR in any of the groups. Conclusions: The role of nesfatin in EC is still poorly understood. In EC type I, a high expression of NESF 1 seems to represent a favourable prognostic factor, while in type II its role is still unknown.

Keywords

Enodmetrial cancer; Nesfatin; Molecular factors

Cite and Share

M. Szarszewska,J. Markowska,A. Gryboś,A. Marszalek,V. Filas,J. Żurawski,M. Jóźwik,A. Olejek,W. Bednarek,R. Mądry,R. Jach,A. Markowska. Role of nesfatin in endometrial cancers. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(5);825-830.

References

[1] Colombo N., Creutzberg C., Amant F., Bosse T., González-Martín A., Ledermann J., et al.: “ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2016, 25, 1.

[2] Murali R., Soslow RA., Weigelt B: “Classification of endometrial carcinoma: more than two types”. Lancet Oncol., 2014, 15, e268.

[3] Globocan 2012: “Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012”. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr

[4] Bokhman J.V.: ‘Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1983, 15, 10.

[5] Tangjitgamol S., Khunnarong J., Srijaipracharoen S.: “Medical morbidities in endometrial cancer patients”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 1623.

[6] Huang M., Djordjevic B., Yates MS., Urbauer D., Sun C., Burzawa J., et al.: “Molecular pathogenesis of endometrial cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome”. Cancer, 2013, 119, 3027.

[7] Hapangama D.K., Kamal A.M., Bulmer J.N.: “Estrogen receptor β: the guardian of the endometrium”. Hum. Reprod. Update, 2015, 21, 174.

[8] Kreizman-Shefer H., Pricop J., Goldman S., Elmalah I., Shalev E.: “Distribution of estrogen and progesterone receptors isoforms in endometrial cancer”. Diagn. Pathol., 2014, 9, 77.

[9] Hampel H., Frankel W., Panescu J., Lockman J., Sotamaa K., Fix D., et al.: “Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis Colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients”. Cancer Res., 2006, 66, 7810.

[10] Sho T., Hachisuga T., Nguyen TT., Urabe R., Kurita T., Kagami S., et al.: “Expression of estrogen receptors-α as a prognostic factor in patients with uterine serous carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 102.

[11] Attias-Geva Z., Bentov I., Kidron D., Amichay K., Sarfstein R., Fishman A., et al.: “p53 regulates insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in uterine serous carcinoma and predicts responsiveness to an insulin-like growth factor-I receptor-directed targeted therapy”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2012, 48, 1570.

[12] Togami S., Sasajima Y., Oi T., Ishikawa M., Onda T., Ikeda S., et al.: “Clinicopathological and prognostic impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) and hormone receptor expression in uterine papillary serous carcinoma”. Cancer Sci., 2012, 103, 926.

[13] Rafii S., Dawson P., Williams S., Pascoe J.S., Nevin J.N., Sundar S., et al.: “Is uterine serous carcinoma a part of hereditary breast cancer syndrome?” J. Clin. Oncol., 31, 2013; abstr 5587.

[14] Bruchim I., Amichay K., Kidron D., Attias Z., Biron-Shental T., Drucker L., et al.: “BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Jewish patients with uterine serous carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2010, 20, 1148.

[15] Setiawan V.W., Yang H.P., Pike M.C., McCann S.E., Yu H., Xiang Y.B., et al.: “Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors?” J. Clin. Oncol., 2013, 31, 2607.

[16] ParK J.Y., Nam J.H., Kim Y.T., Kim Y.M, Kim J.H., Kim D.Y., et al.: “Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients”. Virchows Arch., 2013, 462, 289.

[17] The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network: “Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma”. Nature, 2013, 497, 67.

[18] Takagi K., Miki Y., Tanaka S., Hashimoto CH., Watanabe M., Sasano H., et al.: “Nucleobindin 2 (NUCB2) in human endometrial carcinoma: a potent prognostic factor associated with cell proliferation and migration”. Endocrin. J., 2016, 63, 297.

[19] Zhang Z., Li L., Yang M., Liu H., Boden G., Yang G., et al.: “Increased plasma levels of nesfatin-1 in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus”. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes, 2012, 120, 91.

[20] Ademoglu E.N., Gorar S., Carlıoglu A.,Yazıcı H., Dellal F.D., Berberoglu Z., et al.: “Plasma nesfatin-1 levels are increased in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome”. J. Endocrinol. Invest., 2014, 37, 715.

[21] Häring J., Schüler S., Lattrich C., Ortmann O., Treeck O.: “Role of estrogen receptor β in gynecological cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 127, 673.

[22] Chakravarty D., Srinivasan R., Ghosh S., Gopalan S., Rajwanshi A., Majumdar S.: “Estrogen receptor beta1 and the beta2/betacx isoforms in nonneoplastic endometrium and in endometrioid carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2007, 17, 905.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top