Article Data

  • Views 849
  • Dowloads 149

Original Research

Open Access

Platinum rechallenge in second-line treatment for endometrial carcinoma

  • R. Pereira Souza1,†
  • G. Pinheiro Soares3,†
  • L. Valente Lage3
  • G. Baiocchi2
  • A.A.B.A. da Costa1,*,
  • M. del Pilar Eestevez Diz3

1,Medical Oncology Department (Brazil)

2Gynecologic Oncology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo(Brazil)

3Medical Oncology Department - Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo (Brazil)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4883.2019 Vol.40,Issue 6,December 2019 pp.963-969

Published: 10 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): A.A.B.A. da Costa E-mail: alebalieiro@uol.com.br

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Objectives: Metastatic endometrial carcinoma (EC) has a poor prognosis. Systemic treatment (hormone therapy or chemotherapy) has been used in first line, however, the best therapy as second-line therapy is not known. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge in second-line treatment for EC. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of patients with recurrent EC who were treated with second-line systemic therapy from April 2007 to April 2015 at two cancer centers. Clinical data included: age, histology, tumor grade, tumor stage at diagnosis, site of disease progression, ECOG performance status, adjuvant chemotherapy, first- and second-line chemotherapy for recurrent disease and comorbidities. Results: A total of 84 patients were evaluated. Median age was 66.2 years; most patients had endometrioid histology (67.9%) and grade 2 tumors (45.8%). Twenty-nine patients (34.5%) were treated with platinum rechallenge at second line. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (7.1-12.3 months; 95%CI). Longer OS was observed in platinum rechallenge group compared to non-re-exposed (13.8 months vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.005). Only platinum rechallenge was significantly associated to a better OS on multivariate analysis (HR 0.43 [95%CI 0.21-0.87, p = 0.019]). Platinum rechallenge was also associated with a higher progression-free survival (PFS) (4.9 months vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.008). Con-clusions: The present findings suggest a longer OS and PFS for patients treated with platinum rechallenge at second-line treatment for EC and add more evidence for adoption of this strategy in a scenario where there is little evidence of effective treatments.

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; Second-line therapy.

Cite and Share

R. Pereira Souza,G. Pinheiro Soares,L. Valente Lage,G. Baiocchi,A.A.B.A. da Costa,M. del Pilar Eestevez Diz. Platinum rechallenge in second-line treatment for endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(6);963-969.

References

[1] Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics, 2017”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2017, 67, 7.

[2] Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A.: “Global cancer statistics, 2012”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2015, 65, 87.

[3] Noone A.M., Howlader N., Krapcho M., Miller D., Brest A., Yu M., et al. (eds.): “SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015, National Cancer Institute”. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_ 2015/.

[4] National Cancer Institute (NIH) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: “Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer”. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html

[5] Aapro M.S.: “Doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cisplatin in en-dometrial carcinoma: definitive results of a randomised study (55872) by the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group”. Ann. Oncol., 2003, 14, 441.

[6] Thigpen J.T., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Malfetano J., DuBeshter B., Burger R.A., Liao S. et al.: “Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin With or Without Cisplatin in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gyne-cologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 3902.

[7] Fleming G.F., Filiaci V.L., Bentley R.C., Herzog T., Sorosky J., Vac-carello L., Gallion H.: “Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin + cisplatin versus doxorubicin + 24-h paclitaxel + filgrastim in en-dometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Ann. Oncol., 2004, 15, 1173.

[8] N. Colombo, C. Creutzberg, F. Amant, T. Bosse, A. González-Martín, J. Ledermann, et al., ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Con-ference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Annals of Oncology. 27 (2015) 16–41. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv484.

[9] D. Miller, V. Filiaci, G. Fleming, R. Mannel, D. Cohn, T. Matsumoto, et al., Late-Breaking Abstract 1: Randomized phase III noninferiority trial of first line chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study, Gynecologic On-cology. 125 (2012) 771. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.034.

[10] G.F. Fleming, Second-Line Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: The Need for Better Options, Jco. 33 (2015) 3535–3540. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.7225.

[11] S. McMeekin, D. Dizon, J. Barter, G. Scambia, L. Manzyuk, A. Lisyanskaya, et al., Phase III randomized trial of second-line ixabepi-lone versus paclitaxel or doxorubicin in women with advanced en-dometrial cancer, Gynecologic Oncology. 138 (2015) 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.026.

[12] S. Nagao, S. Nishio, H. Michimae, H. Tanabe, S. Okada, T. Otsuki, et al., Applicability of the concept of “platinum sensitivity” to recur-rent endometrial cancer: The SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study, Gynecologic Oncology. 131 (2013) 567–573. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.021.

[13] C. Aghajanian, V. Fillaci, D. Dizon, J. Carlson, M. Powell, A. Secord, et al., A randomized phase II study of paclitaxel/carboplatin/beva-cizumab, paclitaxel/carboplatin/temsirolimus and ixabepilone/carbo-platin/bevacizumab as initial therapy for measurable stage III or IVA, stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer, GOG-86P, Jco. 33 (2015) abstr 5500.

[14] D. Lorusso, G. Ferrandina, N. Colombo, S. Pignata, V. Salutari, G. Maltese, et al., Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin- paclitaxel (CP) compared to carboplatin- paclitaxel-bevacizumab (CP-B) in ad-vanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent endometrial cancer: The MITO END-2 trial, Jco. 33 (2015) abstr 5502.

[15] M.A. Powell, M.W. Sill, P.J. Goodfellow, D.M. Benbrook, H.A. Lankes, K.K. Leslie, et al., A phase II trial of brivanib in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study, Gynecologic Oncology. 135 (2014) 38–43. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.07.083.

[16] G.F. Fleming, V.L. Filiaci, B. Marzullo, R.J. Zaino, S.A. Davidson, M. Pearl, et al., Temsirolimus with or without megestrol acetate and tamoxifen for endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study, Gynecologic Oncology. 132 (2014) 585–592. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.015.

[17] B.M. Slomovitz, Y. Jiang, M.S. Yates, P.T. Soliman, T. Johnston, M. Nowakowski, et al., Phase II Study of Everolimus and Letrozole in Patients With Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma, Jco. 33 (2015) 930–936. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3401.

[18] D.T. Le, J.N. Uram, H. Wang, B.R. Bartlett, H. Kemberling, A.D. Eyring, et al., PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair De-ficiency, New England Journal of Medicine. 372 (2015) 2509–2520. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1500596.

[19] Buchanan D.D., Tan Y.Y., Walsh M.D., Clendenning M., Metcalf A. M., Ferguson K., et al.: “Tumor Mismatch Repair Immunohisto-chemistry and DNA MLH1Methylation Testing of Patients With En-dometrial Cancer Diagnosed at Age Younger Than 60 Years Opti-mizes Triage for Population-Level Germline Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Testing”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 32, 90.

[20] McMeekin D.S., Tritchler D.L., Cohn D.E., Mutch D.G., Lankes H. A., Geller M.A., et al.: “Clinicopathologic Significance of Mis-match Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2016, 34, 3062.

[21] Ott P.A., Bang Y-J., Berton-Rigaud D., Elez E., Pishvaian M.J., Rugo H. S, et al.: “Safety and Antitumor Activity of Pembrolizumab in Ad-vanced Programmed Death Ligand 1–Positive Endometrial Cancer: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2017, 35, 2535.

[22] Moore K.N., Tian C., McMeekin D.S., Thigpen J.T., Randall M.E., Gallion H.H.: “Does the progression-free interval after primary chemotherapy predict survival after salvage chemotherapy in ad-vanced and recurrent endometrial cancer?” Cancer, 2010, 116, 5407

[23] Ueda Y., Miyake T., Egawa-Takata T., Miyatake T., Matsuzaki S., Yokoyama T., et al.: “Second-line chemotherapy for advanced or re-current endometrial carcinoma previously treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin, with or without epirubicin”. Cancer Chemother. Phar-macol., 2010, 67, 829.

[24] Ball H.G., Blessing J.A, Lentz S.S., Mutch D.G.: “A Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Adenocarci-noma of the Endometrium: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 62, 278.

[25] Lincoln S., Blessing J.A., Lee R.B., Rocereto T.F.: “Activity of pa-clitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 88, 277.

[26] Makker V., Hensley M.L., Zhou Q., Lasonos A., Aghajanian CA.: “Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma With Doxorubicin in Patients Progressing After Paclitaxel/Carboplatin”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 929.

[27] McMeekin S., Dizon D., Barter J., Scambia G., Manzyuk L., Lisyan-skaya A., et al.: “Phase III randomized trial of second-line ixabepi-lone versus paclitaxel or doxorubicin in women with advanced endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 138, 18.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top