Article Data

  • Views 3175
  • Dowloads 178

Original Research

Open Access

Platinum rechallenge in second-line treatment for endometrial carcinoma

  • R. Pereira Souza1,†
  • G. Pinheiro Soares3,†
  • L. Valente Lage3
  • G. Baiocchi2
  • A.A.B.A. da Costa1,*,
  • M. del Pilar Eestevez Diz3

1,Medical Oncology Department (Brazil)

2Gynecologic Oncology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo(Brazil)

3Medical Oncology Department - Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo (Brazil)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4883.2019 Vol.40,Issue 6,December 2019 pp.963-969

Published: 10 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): A.A.B.A. da Costa E-mail: alebalieiro@uol.com.br

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Objectives: Metastatic endometrial carcinoma (EC) has a poor prognosis. Systemic treatment (hormone therapy or chemotherapy) has been used in first line, however, the best therapy as second-line therapy is not known. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge in second-line treatment for EC. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of patients with recurrent EC who were treated with second-line systemic therapy from April 2007 to April 2015 at two cancer centers. Clinical data included: age, histology, tumor grade, tumor stage at diagnosis, site of disease progression, ECOG performance status, adjuvant chemotherapy, first- and second-line chemotherapy for recurrent disease and comorbidities. Results: A total of 84 patients were evaluated. Median age was 66.2 years; most patients had endometrioid histology (67.9%) and grade 2 tumors (45.8%). Twenty-nine patients (34.5%) were treated with platinum rechallenge at second line. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (7.1-12.3 months; 95%CI). Longer OS was observed in platinum rechallenge group compared to non-re-exposed (13.8 months vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.005). Only platinum rechallenge was significantly associated to a better OS on multivariate analysis (HR 0.43 [95%CI 0.21-0.87, p = 0.019]). Platinum rechallenge was also associated with a higher progression-free survival (PFS) (4.9 months vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.008). Con-clusions: The present findings suggest a longer OS and PFS for patients treated with platinum rechallenge at second-line treatment for EC and add more evidence for adoption of this strategy in a scenario where there is little evidence of effective treatments.

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; Second-line therapy.

Cite and Share

R. Pereira Souza,G. Pinheiro Soares,L. Valente Lage,G. Baiocchi,A.A.B.A. da Costa,M. del Pilar Eestevez Diz. Platinum rechallenge in second-line treatment for endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(6);963-969.

References

[1] Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics, 2017”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2017, 67, 7.

[2] Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A.: “Global cancer statistics, 2012”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2015, 65, 87.

[3] Noone A.M., Howlader N., Krapcho M., Miller D., Brest A., Yu M., et al. (eds.): “SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015, National Cancer Institute”. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_ 2015/.

[4] National Cancer Institute (NIH) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: “Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer”. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html

[5] Aapro M.S.: “Doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cisplatin in en-dometrial carcinoma: definitive results of a randomised study (55872) by the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group”. Ann. Oncol., 2003, 14, 441.

[6] Thigpen J.T., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Malfetano J., DuBeshter B., Burger R.A., Liao S. et al.: “Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin With or Without Cisplatin in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gyne-cologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 3902.

[7] Fleming G.F., Filiaci V.L., Bentley R.C., Herzog T., Sorosky J., Vac-carello L., Gallion H.: “Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin + cisplatin versus doxorubicin + 24-h paclitaxel + filgrastim in en-dometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Ann. Oncol., 2004, 15, 1173.

[8] N. Colombo, C. Creutzberg, F. Amant, T. Bosse, A. González-Martín, J. Ledermann, et al., ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Con-ference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Annals of Oncology. 27 (2015) 16–41. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv484.

[9] D. Miller, V. Filiaci, G. Fleming, R. Mannel, D. Cohn, T. Matsumoto, et al., Late-Breaking Abstract 1: Randomized phase III noninferiority trial of first line chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study, Gynecologic On-cology. 125 (2012) 771. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.034.

[10] G.F. Fleming, Second-Line Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: The Need for Better Options, Jco. 33 (2015) 3535–3540. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.7225.

[11] S. McMeekin, D. Dizon, J. Barter, G. Scambia, L. Manzyuk, A. Lisyanskaya, et al., Phase III randomized trial of second-line ixabepi-lone versus paclitaxel or doxorubicin in women with advanced en-dometrial cancer, Gynecologic Oncology. 138 (2015) 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.026.

[12] S. Nagao, S. Nishio, H. Michimae, H. Tanabe, S. Okada, T. Otsuki, et al., Applicability of the concept of “platinum sensitivity” to recur-rent endometrial cancer: The SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study, Gynecologic Oncology. 131 (2013) 567–573. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.021.

[13] C. Aghajanian, V. Fillaci, D. Dizon, J. Carlson, M. Powell, A. Secord, et al., A randomized phase II study of paclitaxel/carboplatin/beva-cizumab, paclitaxel/carboplatin/temsirolimus and ixabepilone/carbo-platin/bevacizumab as initial therapy for measurable stage III or IVA, stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer, GOG-86P, Jco. 33 (2015) abstr 5500.

[14] D. Lorusso, G. Ferrandina, N. Colombo, S. Pignata, V. Salutari, G. Maltese, et al., Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin- paclitaxel (CP) compared to carboplatin- paclitaxel-bevacizumab (CP-B) in ad-vanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent endometrial cancer: The MITO END-2 trial, Jco. 33 (2015) abstr 5502.

[15] M.A. Powell, M.W. Sill, P.J. Goodfellow, D.M. Benbrook, H.A. Lankes, K.K. Leslie, et al., A phase II trial of brivanib in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study, Gynecologic Oncology. 135 (2014) 38–43. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.07.083.

[16] G.F. Fleming, V.L. Filiaci, B. Marzullo, R.J. Zaino, S.A. Davidson, M. Pearl, et al., Temsirolimus with or without megestrol acetate and tamoxifen for endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study, Gynecologic Oncology. 132 (2014) 585–592. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.015.

[17] B.M. Slomovitz, Y. Jiang, M.S. Yates, P.T. Soliman, T. Johnston, M. Nowakowski, et al., Phase II Study of Everolimus and Letrozole in Patients With Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma, Jco. 33 (2015) 930–936. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3401.

[18] D.T. Le, J.N. Uram, H. Wang, B.R. Bartlett, H. Kemberling, A.D. Eyring, et al., PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair De-ficiency, New England Journal of Medicine. 372 (2015) 2509–2520. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1500596.

[19] Buchanan D.D., Tan Y.Y., Walsh M.D., Clendenning M., Metcalf A. M., Ferguson K., et al.: “Tumor Mismatch Repair Immunohisto-chemistry and DNA MLH1Methylation Testing of Patients With En-dometrial Cancer Diagnosed at Age Younger Than 60 Years Opti-mizes Triage for Population-Level Germline Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Testing”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 32, 90.

[20] McMeekin D.S., Tritchler D.L., Cohn D.E., Mutch D.G., Lankes H. A., Geller M.A., et al.: “Clinicopathologic Significance of Mis-match Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2016, 34, 3062.

[21] Ott P.A., Bang Y-J., Berton-Rigaud D., Elez E., Pishvaian M.J., Rugo H. S, et al.: “Safety and Antitumor Activity of Pembrolizumab in Ad-vanced Programmed Death Ligand 1–Positive Endometrial Cancer: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2017, 35, 2535.

[22] Moore K.N., Tian C., McMeekin D.S., Thigpen J.T., Randall M.E., Gallion H.H.: “Does the progression-free interval after primary chemotherapy predict survival after salvage chemotherapy in ad-vanced and recurrent endometrial cancer?” Cancer, 2010, 116, 5407

[23] Ueda Y., Miyake T., Egawa-Takata T., Miyatake T., Matsuzaki S., Yokoyama T., et al.: “Second-line chemotherapy for advanced or re-current endometrial carcinoma previously treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin, with or without epirubicin”. Cancer Chemother. Phar-macol., 2010, 67, 829.

[24] Ball H.G., Blessing J.A, Lentz S.S., Mutch D.G.: “A Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Adenocarci-noma of the Endometrium: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 62, 278.

[25] Lincoln S., Blessing J.A., Lee R.B., Rocereto T.F.: “Activity of pa-clitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 88, 277.

[26] Makker V., Hensley M.L., Zhou Q., Lasonos A., Aghajanian CA.: “Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma With Doxorubicin in Patients Progressing After Paclitaxel/Carboplatin”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 929.

[27] McMeekin S., Dizon D., Barter J., Scambia G., Manzyuk L., Lisyan-skaya A., et al.: “Phase III randomized trial of second-line ixabepi-lone versus paclitaxel or doxorubicin in women with advanced endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 138, 18.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top