Article Data

  • Views 2408
  • Dowloads 118

Case Reports

Open Access

A rare case of false positive metastatic nodes detected at PET/CT scan six months after the laparoscopic treatment of a patient with endometrial cancer

  • R. Tinelli1,*,
  • S. Guicciardini1
  • S. Uccella2
  • E. Cicinelli3
  • F. Romano4
  • G. Trojano4

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,c“Perrino” Hospital, Brindisi

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical School “A. Gemelli”, Rome

32° Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari

4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Cannizzaro” Hospital, Catania (Italy)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4991.2019 Vol.40,Issue 6,December 2019 pp.1039-1040

Published: 10 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): R. Tinelli E-mail: raffaeletinelli@gmail.com

Abstract

A 61-year-old woman was admitted to this hospital with a diagnosis of a poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinoma with myometrial invasion greater than 50 % (IBG3) at MRI. A laparoscopic surgical treatment with peritoneal washing, a type A radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were programmed. Six months later the patient underwent a PET/CT scan that diagnosed a suspected recurrence into the lymph node tissue laterally to the left common iliac artery. Then, the patient underwent a second laparoscopic procedure for dissection of the positive tissue at PET/CT scan on the external site of common iliac artery. At histological examination the dissected two lymph nodes were negative for metastasis and the patient was regularly dis-charged three days after laparoscopy.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Laparoscopy; Lymphadenectomy; PET-CT; Recurrence.

Cite and Share

R. Tinelli,S. Guicciardini,S. Uccella,E. Cicinelli,F. Romano,G. Trojano. A rare case of false positive metastatic nodes detected at PET/CT scan six months after the laparoscopic treatment of a patient with endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(6);1039-1040.

References

[1] Asher R., Obermair A., Janda M., Gebski V.: “Disease-Free and Sur-vival Outcomes for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Compared With Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2018, 28, 529.

[2] O’Hanlan K.A., Sten M.S., Halliday D.M., Sastry R.B., Struck D.M., Uthman K.F.: “Comprehensive laparoscopic lymphadenectomy from the deep circumflex iliac vein to the renal veins: Impact on quality of life”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 144, 592.

[3] Monterossi G., Ghezzi F., Vizza E., Zannoni G.F., Uccella S., Cor-rado G., et al.: “Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?” J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2017, 24, 438.

[4] Uccella S., Bonzini M., Malzoni M., Fanfani F., Palomba S., et al.: “The effect of a uterine manipulator on the recurrence and mortality of endometrial cancer: a multi-centric study by the Italian Society of Gynecological Endoscopy”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2017, 216, 592. e1.

[5] Tinelli R., Cicinelli E., Tinelli A., Bettocchi S., Angioni S., Litta P.: “Laparoscopic treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer with and without uterine manipulator: our experience and review of litera-ture”. Surg. Oncol., 2016, 25, 98.

[6] Tinelli R., Litta P., Meir Y., Surico D., Leo L., Fusco A., Angioni S., Cicinelli E.: “Advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in ex-tremely obese women (BMI>35) with early-stage endometrial can-cer: a multicenter study”. Anticancer Res., 2014, 34, 2497.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top