Article Data

  • Views 554
  • Dowloads 117

Original Research

Open Access

Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer Stages III and IV: a single academic institution experience of 49 patients

  • V. Loizzi1
  • V. Del Vecchio1,*,
  • E. Pisani1
  • G. Ranieri3
  • L. Resta2
  • E. Cicinelli1
  • G. Cormio1,3

1Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Italy

2Department of Pathology, University of Bari

3Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II I.R.C.C.S., Bari (Italy)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo5160.2019 Vol.40,Issue 6,December 2019 pp.1000-1005

Published: 10 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): V. Del Vecchio E-mail: vittoria.delvecchiomd@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical and pathologic factors associated with survival in patients with advanced staged endometrial carcinoma. Matreials and Methods: Between 2005 and 2017 all patients with endometrial carcinoma type I were identified from tumor registry databases at this Academic hospital. The impact of clinical and pathologic risk factors on the survival of patients with endometrial carcinoma was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier life table analyses and log-rank tests. Results: Forty-nine patients with advanced endome-trial cancer were collected. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 42 months whereas the median overall sur-vival (OS) was 69 months for all patients. Univariate analysis was extended to all prognostic factors for all stages showed as statistically significant positive cytology and cervical invasion, whereas for Stage III only cervical invasion. For Stage IIIA the prognostic factors statistically significant were cervical invasion and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Furthermore, prognosis was worse in tumors belonging to Stage IV with positive cytology. Conclusion: Prognostic factors related to a lower survival rate in advanced stages of en-dometrial cancer are represented by cervical invasion, LVSI, and positive peritoneal cytology. These factors with respect to LVSI and positive peritoneal cytology should be included in FIGO 2009 surgical staging system because associated to a poor prognosis.

Keywords

Prognostic Factors; Uterine carcinoma; Endometrial carcinoma.

Cite and Share

V. Loizzi,V. Del Vecchio,E. Pisani,G. Ranieri,L. Resta,E. Cicinelli,G. Cormio. Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer Stages III and IV: a single academic institution experience of 49 patients. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(6);1000-1005.

References

[1] Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E HY, Xu J., Murray T., M.J. T. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2008, 58, 71.

[2] Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Koper P.C., Lybeert ML, Jobsen JJ, Wárlám-Rodenhuis C.C., et al.: “Surgery and postoperative ra-diotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma”. Lancet, 2000, 22,1404.

[3] Potish R.A., Twiggs L.B., Adcock L.L., Konald A..Prem M.D.: “Role of whole abdominal radiation therapy in the management of endome-trial cancer: Prognostic importance of factors indicating peritoneal metastases”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1985, 21, 80.

[4] Solmaz U., Mat E., Dereli M.L., Turan V., Ekin A., Tosun G., Dogan A., et al.: “Stage III and IV endometrial cancer: A single oncology centre review of 104 cases”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2016, 36, 81.

[5] Wang P.H., Wen K.C., Yen M.S.: “Challenges in the management of recurrent endometrial cancer”. J. Chin. Med. Assoc., 2016, 79, 171.

[6] Chan J.K., Sherman A.E., Kapp D.S., Zhang R., Osann K.E., Maxwell L., et al.: “Influence of gynecologic oncologists on the survival of patients with endometrial cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 29, 632.

[7] NCCN clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guide-lines): “Uterine neoplasm. Version 2.2016”.

[8] Jamison P.M., Altekruse S.F., Chang J.T., Zahn J., Lee R., Noone A. M., Barroilhet L.: “Site-specific factors for cancer of the corpus uteri from SEER registries: collaborative stage data collection sys-tem, version 1 and version 2”. Cancer, 2014, 120, 3836.

[9] Pecorelli S., Creasman W., Pettersson F., Benedet J.L., Shaperd J.H.: “FIGO annual report on the results of treatment in gynecologic can-cer”. J. Epidemiol. Biostat., 1998, 3, 35.

[10] Berman M.L., Ballon S.C., Lagasse L.D., Watring W.G.: “Prognosis and treatment of endometrial cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Oncol., 1984, 136, 679.

[11] Boronow R.C., Morrow C.P., Creasman W.T., Disaia P.J., Silverberg S. G., Miller A., Blessing J.A.: “Surgical staging in endometrial can-cer: clinical pathologic findings of a prospective study”. Obstet. Gy-necol., 1984, 63, 825.

[12] Creasman W.T., Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Homesley H.D., Graham J. E., Heller P.B.: “Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. Cancer, 1987, 60, 2035.

[13] Gal D., Recio F.O., Zamurovic D., Tancer M.L.:”Lymphvascular space involvement - a prognostic indicator in endometrial adenocar-cinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1991, 42, 142.

[14] Larson D.M., Connor G.P., Broste S.K., Krawisz B.R., Johnson K. K.: “Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 88, 394.

[15] Mazurka J.L., Krepart G.V., Lotocki R.J.: “Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal citology in endometrial carcinoma”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1988, 158, 303.

[16] Obermair A., Geramou M., Tripcony L., Nicklin J.L., Perrin L., Crandon A.J.: “Peritoneal cytology: impact on disease-free sur-vival in clinical stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus”. Cancer Lett., 2001, 164, 105.

[17] McLellan R., Dillon M.B., Currie J.L., Rosenshein N.B.: “Peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: a review”. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv., 1989, 44, 711.

[18] Lurain J.R.: “The significance of positive peritoneal cytology in en-dometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1992, 46, 143.

[19] Kadar N., Homesley H.D., Malfetano J.H.: “Positive peritoneal cytol-ogy is an adverse factor in endometrial carcinoma only if there is other evidence of extrauterine disease”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1992, 46, 145.

[20] Grimshaw R.N., Tupper W.C., Fraser R.C., Tompkins M.G., Jeffrey J. F.: “Prognostic value of peritoneal cytology in endometrial carci-noma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1990, 36, 97.

[21] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Beller U., Benedet J. L., Heintz A.P., et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri”. Int. J. Gy-naecol. Obstet., 2003, 83, 79.

[22] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gy-naecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103.

[23] Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Kurman R.J., Creasman W.T., Heller P., Homeseley H.D., Graham J.E.: “Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II car-cinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1991, 40, 55.

[24] Chen J.R., Chang T.C., Fu H.C., Lau H.Y., Chen I.H., Ke Y.M., et al.: “Outcomes of patients with surgicopathologically staged IIIA-IVB pure endometrioid-type endometrial cancer”. Medicine, 2016, 95, 1.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top