Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage for breast cancer-related lymphoedema: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
1Department of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, 730030 Lanzhou, Gansu, China
2School of Nursing, Evidence-based Nursing Center, Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China
3Department of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, 730030 Lanzhou, Gansu, China
DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2023.001 Vol.44,Issue 1,February 2023 pp.1-16
Submitted: 05 July 2022 Accepted: 08 October 2022
Published: 15 February 2023
*Corresponding Author(s): Wanqiang Chen E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
† These authors contributed equally.
There are several studies on the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) based on the manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) technique, making it a widely accepted conservative treatment for BCRL. In this study, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for systematic reviews (SRs) or meta-analyses (MAs) from inception till 28 March 2022. The methodological quality of the included SRs/MAs was evaluated using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), and the evidence quality of outcome measures using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) was used to describe the certainty of evidence from qualitative data. The study results identified 7 eligible SRs/MAs. Evaluation using AMSTAR-2 revealed only one moderate quality study, while the others were rated as low or critically low. The GRADE criteria identified 3 very-low-quality evidence studies, 1 low-quality evidence study, and 9 moderate-quality evidence studies. The GRADE-CERQual assessment showed the confidence for decision-making was either low or moderate. Overall, the results indicated that MLD could significantly reduce lymphedema in patients aged <60 years (standard mean difference (SMD): −1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): (−2.23 to −1.31)), and the optimal intervention duration was 1 month. Although MLD for BCRL might reduce lymphoedema volume, their effects were not well established, and therefore, we could not recommend the addition of MLD to complete decongestive therapy (CDT) or compression therapy for patients with BCRL. Thus, MLD treatment appeared to be an ambiguous but potentially effective BCRL treatment. Rigorously designed high-quality randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to further verify the effectiveness of MLD therapy in BCRL treatment.
Manual lymphatic drainage; Breast cancer-related lymphoedema; Effectiveness; Overview
Wenting Xing,Dan Duan,Caixia Ye,Cheng Chen,Yonggui Ge,Yuanyuan Li,Haijuan Lin,Jiqi Wu,Wanqiang Chen. Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage for breast cancer-related lymphoedema: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2023. 44(1);1-16.
 Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209–249.
 Stanton AW, Modi S, Mellor RH, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Recent advances in breast cancer-related lymphedema of the arm: lymphatic pump failure and predisposing factors. Lymphatic Research and Biology. 2009; 27: 29–45.
 Kaufman DI, Shah C, Vicini FA, Rizzi M. Utilization of bioimpedance spectroscopy in the prevention of chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2017; 166: 809–815.
 Shih YT, Xu Y, Cormier JN, Giordano S, Ridner SH, Buchholz TA, et al. Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009; 27: 2007–2014.
 Stout NL, Pfalzer LA, Springer B, Levy E, McGarvey CL, Danoff JV, et al. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: comparing direct costs of a prospective surveillance model and a traditional model of care. Physical Therapy. 2012; 92: 152–163.
 DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Oncology. 2013; 14: 500–515.
 Shaitelman SF, Cromwell KD, Rasmussen JC, Stout NL, Armer JM, Lasinski BB, et al. Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015; 65: 55–81.
 Lawenda BD, Mondry TE, Johnstone PAS. Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2009; 59: 8–24.
 Stuiver M, ten Tusscher M, Agasi-Idenburg C, Lucas C, Aaronson N, Bossuyt P. Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper-limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of developing lymphoedema after breast cancer therapy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 13: CD009765.
 Rio-Gonzalez A, Cerezo-Tellez E, Gala-Guirao C, Gonzalez-Fernandez L, Diaz-Meco Conde R, et al. Effects of different neck manual lymphatic drainage maneuvers on the nervous, cardiovascular, respiratory and musculoskeletal systems in healthy students. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 4062.
 Godoy JMPD, Pereira de Godoy HJ, Gracino de Marqui T, Spessoto LC, Godoy MDFG. Mobilization of fluids in the intensive treatment of primary and secondary lymphedemas. The Scientific World Journal. 2018; 2018: 1–4.
 Kim S, Yi C, Kwon O. Effect of complex decongestive therapy on edema and the quality of life in breast cancer patients with unilateral leymphedema. Lymphology. 2007; 40: 143–151.
 Vairo GL, Miller SJ, McBrier NM, Buckley WE. Systematic review of efficacy for manual lymphatic drainage techniques in sports medicine and rehabilitation: an evidence-based practice approach. The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2009; 17: e80–89.
 Torres Lacomba M, Yuste Sanchez MJ, Zapico Goni A, Prieto Merino D, Mayoral del Moral O, Cerezo Tellez E, et al. Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial. BMJ. 2010; 340: b5396–b5396.
 Tambour M, Holt M, Speyer A, Christensen R, Gram B. Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to complete decongestive therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial. British Journal of Cancer. 2018; 119: 1215–1222.
 Bougioukas KI, Liakos A, Tsapas A, Ntzani E, Haidich A. Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018; 93: 9–24.
 Shi J, Zhao L, Gao Y, Niu M, Yan M, Chen Y, et al. Associating the risk of three urinary cancers with obesity and overweight: an overview with evidence mapping of systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2021; 10: 58.
 Thomson D, Russell K, Becker L, Klassen T, Hartling L. The evolution of a new publication type: steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. 2010; 1: 198–211.
 Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; 349: g7647–g7647.
 Higgins JPT, Sally. G. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration: UK. 2011.
 Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358: j4008.
 Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, et al. An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016; 70: 106–110.
 Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Rashidian A, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implementation Science. 2018; 13: 2.
 Huang T, Tseng S, Lin C, Bai C, Chen C, Hung C, et al. Effects of manual lymphatic drainage on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2013; 11: 15.
 Liang M, Chen Q, Peng K, Deng L, He L, Hou Y, et al. Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema in patients after breast cancer surgery. Medicine. 2020; 99: e23192.
 Shao Y, Zhong DS. Manual lymphatic drainage for breast cancer-related lymphoedema. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2017; 26: e12517.
 Thompson B, Gaitatzis K, Janse de Jonge X, Blackwell R, Koelmeyer LA. Manual lymphatic drainage treatment for lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2021; 15: 244–258.
 Ezzo J, Manheimer E, McNeely ML, Howell DM, Weiss R, Johansson KI, et al. Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; CD003475.
 Devoogdt N, Van Kampen M, Geraerts I, Coremans T, Christiaens M. Different physical treatment modalities for lymphoedema developing after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2010; 149: 3–9.
 Kärki A, Anttila H, Tasmuth T, Rautakorpi U. Lymphoedema therapy in breast cancer patients—a systematic review on effectiveness and a survey of current practices and costs in Finland. Acta Oncologica. 2009; 48: 850–859.
 Andersen L, Højris I, Erlandsen M, Andersen J. Treatment of breast-cancer-related lymphedema with or without manual lymphatic drainage: a randomized study. Acta Oncologica. 2000; 39: 399–405.
 Belmonte R, Tejero M, Ferrer M, Muniesa JM, Duarte E, Cunillera O, et al. Efficacy of low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a cross-over randomized trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2012; 26: 607–618.
 Bergmann A, da Costa Leite Ferreira M, de Aguiar S, de Almeida Dias R, de Souza Abrahao K, Paltrinieri E, et al. Physiotherapy in upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer treatment: a randomized study. Lymphology. 2014; 47: 82–91.
 Gradalski T, Ochalek K, Kurpiewska J. Complex decongestive lymphatic therapy with or without vodder II manual lymph drainage in more severe chronic postmastectomy upper limb lymphedema: a randomized noninferiority prospective study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2015; 50: 750–757.
 Ha KJ, Lee SY, Lee H, Choi SJ. Synergistic effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and manual lymphatic drainage in patients with mastectomy-related lymphedema. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017; 8: 959.
 Johansson K, Lie E, Ekdahl C, Lindfeldt J. A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema. Lymphology. 1998; 31: 56–64.
 McNeely ML, Magee DJ, Lees AW, Bagnall KM, Haykowsky M, Hanson J. The addition of manual lymph drainage to compression therapy for breast cancer related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2004; 86: 95–106.
 Odebiyi DO, Aborowa AT, Sokunbi OG, Aweto HA, Ajekigbe AT. Effects of exercise and oedema massage on fatigue level and quality of life of female breast cancer patients. European Journal of Physiotherapy. 2014; 16: 238–245.
 Ridner SH, Poage-Hooper E, Kanar C, Doersam JK, Bond SM, Dietrich MS. A pilot randomized trial evaluating low-level laser therapy as an alternative treatment to manual lymphatic drainage for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2013; 40: 383–393.
 Sanal-Toprak C, Ozsoy-Unubol T, Bahar-Ozdemir Y, Akyuz G. The efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as a substitute for manual lymphatic drainage in complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of breast cancer related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2019; 52: 82–91.
 Sitzia J, Sobrido L, Harlow W. Manual lymphatic drainage compared with simple lymphatic drainage in the treatment of post-mastectomy lymphoedema. Physiotherapy. 2002; 88: 99–107.
 Williams AF, Vadgama A, Franks PJ, Mortimer PS. A randomized controlled crossover study of manual lymphatic drainage therapy in women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2002; 11: 254–261.
 Johansson K, Albertsson M, Ingvar C, Ekdahl C. Effects of compression bandaging with or without manual lymph drainage treatment in patients with postoperative arm lymphedema. Lymphology. 1999; 32: 103–110.
 Dіdem K, Ufuk YS, Serdar S, Zümre A. The comparison of two different physiotherapy methods in treatment of lymphedema after breast surgery. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2005; 93: 49–54.
 Szolnoky G, Lakatos B, Keskeny T, Varga E, Varga M, Dobozy A, et al. Intermittent pneumatic compression acts synergistically with manual lymphatic drainage in complex decongestive physiotherapy for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2009; 42: 188–194.
 Martín ML, Hernández MA, Avendaño C, Rodríguez F, Martínez H. Manual lymphatic drainage therapy in patients with breast cancer related lymphoedema. BMC Cancer. 2011; 11: 94.
 Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Physical Therapy. 2003; 83: 134–145.
 Sander AP, Hajer NM, Hemenway K, Miller AC. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume. Physical Therapy. 2002; 82: 1201–1212.
 Stanton AW, Badger C, Sitzia J. Non-invasive assessment of the lymphedematous limb. Lymphology. 2000; 33: 122–135.
 Cho Y, Do J, Jung S, Kwon O, Jeon JY. Effects of a physical therapy program combined with manual lymphatic drainage on shoulder function, quality of life, lymphedema incidence, and pain in breast cancer patients with axillary web syndrome following axillary dissection. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24: 2047–2057.
Vol., Issue , Invalid dateTable of contents
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.