Article Data

  • Views 738
  • Dowloads 180

Original Research

Open Access

Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis for the recurrence of pelvic endodermal sinus tumors

  • Yanglong Guo1
  • He Wang2
  • Xi Chen1
  • Qingqing Lin3
  • Tao Zhu1,*,
  • Yingli Zhang1,*,

1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

2The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

3Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2023.039 Vol.44,Issue 3,June 2023 pp.62-70

Submitted: 16 February 2023 Accepted: 27 March 2023

Published: 15 June 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Tao Zhu E-mail: zhutao@zjcc.org.cn
*Corresponding Author(s): Yingli Zhang E-mail: zhangyl@zjcc.org.cn

Abstract

This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics and factors influencing the recurrence of pelvic endodermal sinus tumor (PEST). 54 cases were retrospectively analyzed from at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Progression-free survival (PFS) and related factors on disease recurrence were evaluated. Six patients had extragonadal endodermal sinus tumor, and four had histological features of endodermal sinus tumor (EST) combined with embryonal carcinoma (EC). 39 patients underwent fertility-preserving surgery, 18 patients had a childbearing history, and eight patients had residual tumor after initial treatment as surgery or chemotherapy. 26 patients had a tumor diameter of more than 15 cm, and 30 patients had a serum αfetoprotein (AFP) level greater than 10,000 ng/mL before initial management. The median follow-up was 47.5 months (range, 14–212 months). During follow-up, 15 patients experience recurrence, with a recurrence rate of 27.8% and a 5-year PFS rate of 61.1%. In univariate analysis, the FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage (stage III–IV vs. I–II; hazard ratio (HR) = 9.73, p < 0.001), residual tumor (yes vs. no for the first surgery; HR = 4.86, p = 0.001), histological features (EST combined with EC vs. EST; HR = 4.08, p = 0.017), and use of platinum-based chemotherapy (courses ≥3 vs. courses <3; HR = 0.19, p = 0.004) were independent factors influencing recurrence. In multivariate analysis, only stage was an independent risk factor for PFS (stage III–IV vs. I–II; HR = 6.92, p = 0.02). Stage is a prognostic factor for recurrence of PEST. The aim of the initial surgery is to maximally debulk all grossly visible tumor and the post-operative treatment should include a sufficient dose and full course of platinum-based chemotherapy, which may reduce the recurrence rate. Maybe some gene expression that could be associate with PEST.


Keywords

Pelvic endodermal sinus tumor; Yolk sac tumor; Embryonal carcinoma; FIGO stage; Residual tumor; Platinum-based chemotherapy


Cite and Share

Yanglong Guo,He Wang,Xi Chen,Qingqing Lin,Tao Zhu,Yingli Zhang. Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis for the recurrence of pelvic endodermal sinus tumors. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2023. 44(3);62-70.

References

[1] Raynald, Yang H, Zhang X, Ma’ruf L, Li C, Jiang T. Primary intracranial pure endodermal sinus tumor: a retrospective series of 6 cases in a single center and a systematic review of overall survival. Neurochirurgie. 2021; 67: 587–598.

[2] Elbaz M, Qadiry RE, Fouraiji K, Jalal H, Elhoudzi J. Yolk sac tumor of vagina: a rare cause of vaginal bleeding in adolescents—a case report. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2020; 37: 169.

[3] García-Gómez FJ, Villar-Rodríguez JL, Beato-Zambrano C, de la Riva-Pérez PA, Calvo-Morón MC. 18F-FDG PET/CT in pure testicular yolk sac tumor in adult. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2021; 47: 202–204.

[4] Simpson S, Simoni M, Hui P, Taylor HS, Buza N. Extragonadal yolk sac tumor limited to the myometrium. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2020; 39: 247–253.

[5] Mayhew AC, Rytting H, Olson TA, Smith E, Childress KJ. Vaginal yolk sac tumor: a case series and review of the literature. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2021; 34: 54–60.e4.

[6] Tamura D, Maeda D, Sato T, Sugawara T, Shirasawa H, Shimizu D, et al. An extragonadal yolk sac tumor presumed to be of postmeiotic germ cell origin by genetic zygosity analysis via single nucleotide polymorphism array. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer. 2020; 59: 209–213.

[7] DM. Gershenson. Treatment of ovarian cancer in young women. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 55: 65–74.

[8] Wang Y, Yang J, Yu M, Cao D, Zhang Y, Zong X, et al. Ovarian yolk sac tumor in postmenopausal females. Medicine. 2018; 97: e11838.

[9] Ravishankar S, Malpica A, Ramalingam P, Euscher ED. Yolk sac tumor in extragonadal pelvic sites. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2017; 41: 1–11.

[10] Yang Z, Liu Z, Wei R, Li L. An analysis of prognostic factors in patients with ovarian malignant germ cell tumors who are treated with fertility-preserving surgery. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2016; 81: 1–9.

[11] Yang ZJ, Wei RJ, Li L. Prognostic factors analysis in patients with ovarian malignant germ cell tumor treated with fertility-preserving surgery. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012; 47: 898–904. (In Chinese)

[12] Kawai M, Kano T, Furuhashi Y, Mizuno K, Nakashima N, Hattori SE, et al. Prognostic factors in yolk sac tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic analysis of 29 cases. Cancer. 1991; 67: 184–192.

[13] Nawa A, Obata N, Kikkawa F, Kawai M, Nagasaka T, Goto S, et al. Prognostic factors of patients with yolk sac tumors of the ovary. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001; 184: 1182–1188.

[14] Wang X, Ma Z, Li Y. Ovarian yolk sac tumor: the experience of a regional cancer center. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2016; 26: 884–891.

[15] Nasioudis D, Chapman-Davis E, Frey MK, Caputo TA, Holcomb K. Management and prognosis of ovarian yolk sac tumors; an analysis of the national cancer data base. Gynecologic Oncology. 2017; 147: 296–301.

[16] Cicin I, Saip P, Guney N, Eralp Y, Ayan I, Kebudi R, et al. Yolk sac tumours of the ovary: evaluation of clinicopathological features and prognostic factors. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2009; 146: 210–214.

[17] Zhao T, Liu Y, Jiang H, Zhang H, Lu Y. Management of bilateral malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: experience of a single institute. Molecular and Clinical Oncology. 2016; 5: 383–387.

[18] Mahdi H, Kumar S, Seward S, Semaan A, Batchu R, Lockhart D, et al. Prognostic impact of laterality in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2011; 21: 257–262.

[19] Frazier AL, Hale JP, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Dang H, Olson T, Murray MJ, et al. Revised risk classification for pediatric extracranial germ cell tumors based on 25 years of clinical trial data from the United Kingdom and United States. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015; 33: 195–201.

[20] Neeyalavira V, Suprasert P. Outcomes of malignant ovarian germ-cell tumors treated in chiang mai university hospital over a nine year period. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2014; 15: 4909–4913.

[21] Chen C, Lin H, Weng C, Wen K, Lu C, Chou H, et al. Outcome of 3-day bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumours: a Taiwanese gynecologic oncology group study. European Journal of Cancer. 2014; 50: 3161–3167.

[22] Zhang R, Sun YC, Zhang GY, Wu LY, Zuo J. Treatment of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors and preservation of fertility. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012; 33: 489–492.

[23] GERSHENSON D. Management of early ovarian cancer: germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumors. Gynecologic Oncology. 1994; 55: S562–S572.

[24] Mitchell PL, Al-Nasiri N, A’Hern R, Fisher C, Horwich A, Pinkerton CR, et al. Treatment of nondysgerminomatous ovarian germ cell tumors. Cancer. 1999; 85: 2232–2244.

[25] Kojimahara T, Nakahara K, Takano T, Yaegashi N, Nishiyama H, Fujimori K, et al. Yolk sac tumor of the ovary: a retrospective multicenter study of 33 Japanese women by Tohoku gynecologic cancer unit (TGCU). The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2013; 230: 211–217.

[26] de la Motte Rouge T, Pautier P, Genestie C, Rey A, Gouy S, Leary A, et al. Prognostic significance of an early decline in serum alpha-fetoprotein during chemotherapy for ovarian yolk sac tumors. Gynecologic Oncology. 2016; 142: 452–457.

[27] Elashry R, Hemida R, Goda H, Abdel-Hady el-S. Prognostic factors of germ cell and sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors in pediatric age: 5 years’ experience. Journal of Experimental Therapeutics and Oncology. 2013; 10: 181–187.

[28] Solheim O, Kærn J, Tropé CG, Rokkones E, Dahl AA, Nesland JM, et al. Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: presentation, survival and second cancer in a population based Norwegian cohort (1953–2009). Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 131: 330–335.

[29] Bilici A, Inanc M, Ulas A, Akman T, Seker M, Babacan NA, et al. Clinical and pathologic features of patients with rare ovarian tumors: multi-center review of 167 patients by the Anatolian society of medical oncology. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2013; 14: 6493–6499.

[30] Yanglong Guo, Xi Chen, Qingqing Lin, Tao Zhu, Yingli Zhang. Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis for the recurrence of pelvic endodermal sinus tumors. To be published in ResearchSquare. 2021.[Preprint].



Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top