Intraoperative complications, treatments and outcomes of lymph node dissection for gynecological malignancies

Background: Lymph node dissection (LND) is crucial in gynecological malignancies for accurate staging, adjuvant therapy and curative intent. Intraoperative vascular injuries, nerve injuries, and ureter injuries may be observed. The aim of our study is to evaluate intraoperative vascular, nerve, and ureteral injuries associated with the LND procedure, along with their treatments and outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent pelvic ± para-aortic LND due to gynecological malignancies (cervical, endometrial and ovarian) at the Gynecological Oncology Surgery Clinic between 2015 and 2024. Results: Two thousand four hundred ninety-three cases were reviewed. Major intraoperative complications associated with lymph node dissection (LND) occurred in 59 cases (2.3%). In 39 patients (1.5%), small (<1 cm) lacerations of the inferior vena cava (IVC) were observed and were repaired with primary suturing (6.0 Prolene). There were 3 (0.1%) cases of vascular injury requiring repair with a vascular graft. No complications were observed in any patients during postoperative follow-up after grafting. There were eight (0.3%) patients with obturator nerve injury. Ureteral injury occurred in 9 (0.3%) patients. Conclusions: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection associated with gynecological malignancies, while rare, can lead to complications that may result in serious morbidity or mortality. Follow-ups of intraoperatively diagnosed and repaired complications (such as inferior vena cava injury, vascular injuries requiring graft repair, obturator nerve injury and ureteral injury) generally did not lead to morbidity. Intraoperative diagnosis and appropriate treatment are usually associated with low morbidity and improved quality of life.

Gynecological malignancy; Lymph node; Obturator nerve; Ureteral injury

[1] Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD, Backes FJ, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Barroilhet L, Behbakht K, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: ovarian cancer, version 3.2022. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2022; 20: 972–980.

[2] Koskas M, Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL. Cancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2021; 155: 45–60.

[3] Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2021; 155: 28–44.

[4] Terada S, Tanaka T, Murakami H, Tsuchihashi H, Toji A, Daimon A, et al. Lymphatic complications following sentinel node biopsy or pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 4540.

[5] Matsuo K, Klar M, Nusbaum DJ, Hasanov MF, Vallejo A, Ciesielski KM, et al. Utilization and outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy for early endometrial cancer. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2022; 139: 809–820.

[6] Saemathong T, Chaowawanit W. A retrospective study of complications following pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology. World Journal of Oncology. 2024; 15: 423–431.

[7] Benito V, Romeu S, Esparza M, Carballo S, Arencibia O, Medina N, et al. Safety and feasibility analysis of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in pelvic gynecologic malignancies: a prospective study. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2015; 25: 1704–1710.

[8] Topdagi Yilmaz EP, Topdaği YE, Bilge N, Kumtepe Y. Comparison of the harmonic scalpel with scissors in women who experience obturator nerve injury during lymph node dissection for gynaecological malignancies. Ginekologia Polska. 2019; 90: 577–581.

[9] Kumka M. Critical sites of entrapment of the posterior division of the obturator nerve: anatomical considerations. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2010; 54: 33–42.

[10] Ghaemmaghami F, Behnamfar F, Saberi H. Immediate grafting of transected obturator nerve during radical hysterectomy. International Journal of Surgery. 2009; 7: 168–169.

[11] Loeb S, Partin AW, Schaeffer EM. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits? Reviews in Urology. 2010; 12: 20–24.

[12] Irisarri C. History of peripheral nerve injuries. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024; 49: 812–823.

[13] McMorrow LA, Czarnecki P, Reid AJ, Tos P. Current perspectives on peripheral nerve repair and management of the nerve gap. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024; 49: 698–711.

[14] Warli SM, Ramon R, Nasution R, Kadar DD, Adhyatma KP, Tala MRZ. Characteristics and management of iatrogenic urinary tract injuries in teaching hospital: a single-centered study. Urology Annals. 2024; 16: 197–202.

[15] Tinelli R, Dellino M, Nappi L, Sorrentino F, D’Alterio MN, Angioni S, et al. Left external iliac vein injury during laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage ovarian cancer: our experience and review of literature. Frontiers in Surgery. 2022; 9: 843641.

[16] Kostov S, Selçuk I, Yordanov A, Kornovski Y, Yalçın H, Slavchev S, et al. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology-significance of vessels variations. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 953.

[17] Levin SR, de Geus SWL, Noel NL, Paasche-Orlow MK, Farber A, Siracuse JJ. Vascular repairs in gynecologic operations are uncommon but predict major morbidity and mortality. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2020; 72: 1059–1066.e2.