Article Data

  • Views 611
  • Dowloads 117

Original Research

Open Access

Importance of hereditary variants in ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer

  • Drenushe Zhuri1,*,
  • Selma Demir1
  • Hazal Sezginer Guler1
  • Sinem Yalcintepe1
  • Engin Atli1
  • Emine Ikbal Atli1
  • Hakan Gurkan1

1Department of Medical Genetics, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, 22030 Edirne, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2025.067 Vol.46,Issue 5,May 2025 pp.67-78

Submitted: 11 September 2024 Accepted: 24 October 2024

Published: 15 May 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Drenushe Zhuri E-mail: drenushezhuri1@trakya.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: Ovarian and endometrial cancers are characterized by a complex interplay of genetic alterations that underlie their pathogenesis, progression and clinical behavior. Recent advances in genomic technologies have revolutionized our understanding of the genetic landscape of these gynecological malignancies, shedding light on the intricate molecular mechanisms driving tumorigenesis. The introduction of advanced sequencing methods and precision medicine has facilitated the investigation of targeted treatments tailored to specific genetic variations, opening up novel paths for personalized therapeutic interventions. Methods: Herein in our study, we analyzed fifty patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer and twenty patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer using the NextSeq-550-Illumina, Next-generation sequencing (NGS) system and Qiaseq Targeted (Qiagen) DNA panel. Results: Thirty-seven variants were detected in 50 ovarian cancer-diagnosed cases. In total forty-six variants were detected, eleven (23.9%) of them were pathogenic/likely pathogenic -one novel- and thirty-five (76.1%) of them were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), so the diagnostic rate for ovarian cancer in our study is (18%). In endometrium cancer we detected variants in 12 cases, we detected 17 variants, six (35.2%) of which were pathogenic/likely pathogenic, and 11 (64.7%) VUS. For endometrium cancer, the diagnostic rate was (30%). Conclusions: Integrating genomic data with clinical and pathological parameters holds promise for refining risk stratification, prognostication and treatment selection, ultimately improving outcomes for patients. This study provides the landscape of genetic research in our laboratory in ovarian and endometrial cancer cases and also highlights the importance of hereditary variants in ovarian and endometrium cancers.


Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Endometrium cancer; NGSvvvv


Cite and Share

Drenushe Zhuri,Selma Demir,Hazal Sezginer Guler,Sinem Yalcintepe,Engin Atli,Emine Ikbal Atli,Hakan Gurkan. Importance of hereditary variants in ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2025. 46(5);67-78.

References

[1] Tsaousis GN, Papadopoulou E, Apessos A, Agiannitopoulos K, Pepe G, Kampouri S, et al. Analysis of hereditary cancer syndromes by using a panel of genes: novel and multiple pathogenic mutations. BMC Cancer. 2019; 19: 535.

[2] Garutti M, Foffano L, Mazzeo R, Michelotti A, Da Ros L, Viel A, et al. Hereditary cancer syndromes: a comprehensive review with a visual tool. Genes. 2023; 14: 1025.

[3] Schubert S, van Luttikhuizen JL, Auber B, Schmidt G, Hofmann W, Penkert J, et al. The identification of pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 negative, high risk, hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer patients: high frequency of FANCM pathogenic variants. International Journal of Cancer. 2019; 144: 2683–2694.

[4] Taieb J, Svrcek M, Cohen R, Basile D, Tougeron D, Phelip J. Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. European Journal of Cancer. 2022; 175: 136–157.

[5] Frey MK, Finch A, Kulkarni A, Akbari MR, Chapman-Davis E. Genetic testing for all: overcoming disparities in ovarian cancer genetic testing. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. 2022; 8: 471–482.

[6] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209–249.

[7] Lau CH, Seow KM, Chen KH. The molecular mechanisms of actions, effects, and clinical implications of PARP inhibitors in epithelial ovarian cancers: a systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23: 8125.

[8] Andrikopoulou A, Zografos E, Apostolidou K, Kyriazoglou A, Papatheodoridi AM, Kaparelou M, et al. Germline and somatic variants in ovarian carcinoma: a next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022; 12: 1030786.

[9] Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, et al. Endometrial cancer. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2021; 7: 88.

[10] Yen T, Wang T, Fader AN, Shih I, Gaillard S. Molecular classification and emerging targeted therapy in endometrial cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2020; 39: 26–35.

[11] Samartzis EP, Labidi-Galy SI, Moschetta M, Uccello M, Kalaitzopoulos DR, Perez-Fidalgo JA, et al. Endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas: insights into pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutic targets—a narrative review. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2020; 8: 1712.

[12] Restaino S, Paglietti C, Arcieri M, Biasioli A, Della Martina M, Mariuzzi L, et al. Management of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer: comparison of guidelines. Cancers. 2023; 15: 1091.

[13] Sivapalan L, Anagnostou V. Genetic variation in antigen presentation and cancer immunotherapy. Immunity. 2022; 55: 3–6.

[14] Wang R, Sun Y, Li C, Xue Y, Ba X. Targeting the DNA damage response for cancer therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 15907.

[15] Musacchio L, Caruso G, Pisano C, Cecere SC, Di Napoli M, Attademo L, et al. PARP inhibitors in endometrial cancer: current status and perspectives. Cancer Management and Research. 2020; 12: 6123–6135.

[16] O’Malley DM, Krivak TC, Kabil N, Munley J, Moore KN. PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: a review. Targeted Oncology. 2023; 18: 471–503.

[17] Demir S, Tozkir H, Gurkan H, Atli EI, Yalcintepe S, Atli E, et al. Genetic screening results of individuals with high risk BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer in Trakya region of Turkey. Journal of BUON. 2020; 25: 1337–1347.

[18] Santonocito C, Rizza R, Paris I, Marchis L, Paolillo C, Tiberi G, et al. Spectrum of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants identified in 2351 ovarian and breast cancer patients referring to a reference cancer hospital of Rome. Cancers. 2020; 12: 1286.

[19] Matiller V, Hein GJ, Stassi AF, Angeli E, Belotti EM, Ortega HH, et al. Expression of TGFBR1, TGFBR2, TGFBR3, ACVR1B and ACVR2B is altered in ovaries of cows with cystic ovarian disease. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2019; 54: 46–54.

[20] Akimoto Y, Fujii W, Naito K, Sugiura K. The effect of ACVR1B/TGFBR1/ACVR1C signaling inhibition on oocyte and granulosa cell development during in vitro growth culture. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2023; 69: 270–278.

[21] Ibáñez CF. Regulation of metabolic homeostasis by the TGF-β superfamily receptor ALK7. The FEBS Journal. 2022; 289: 5776–5797.

[22] Jin MH, Oh DY. ATM in DNA repair in cancer. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2019; 203: 107391.

[23] Slade D. PARP and PARG inhibitors in cancer treatment. Genes & Development. 2020; 34: 360–394.

[24] Smith M, Pothuri B. Appropriate selection of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Current Treatment Options in Oncology. 2022; 23: 887–903.

[25] Yoshida R. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): review of its molecular characteristics, screening, treatment, and prognosis. Breast Cancer. 2021; 28: 1167–1180.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top