Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Comprehensive analysis of the impact of circulating metabolites on the risk of endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization study
1Department of Gynecology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 519000 Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2025.081 Vol.46,Issue 6,June 2025 pp.69-81
Submitted: 31 July 2024 Accepted: 03 September 2024
Published: 15 June 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Hua Yang E-mail: yangh353@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the predominant gynecological malignancy in developed countries and is closely associated with metabolic syndrome. However, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and the impact of serum circulating metabolites (CMs) on EC risk remain largely unexplored. Methods: To elucidate potential associations between CMs and EC, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted. The study utilized summary genome-wide association study (GWAS) data labeled as ebi-a-GCST006464, serving as the outcome dataset, which included data from 12,906 cases and 108,979 controls, all of European descent. Genetic predictors associated with CMs were sourced from three metabolite GWAS datasets compiled by Shin, Kettunen, and Borges. Results: The MR analyses revealed 36 associations between CMs and EC that passed a nominal p-value significance threshold (p-value range: 0.003–0.0492). However, upon multiple testing correction, none of the CMs remained significantly associated with EC. Subgroup analysis found 27 associations between CMs and endometrioid EC passed a nominal p-value significance threshold (p-value range: 5.69 × 10−6–0.0499). Notably, the associations for 4-androsten-3beta,17beta-diol disulfate 2 and Hexadecanedioate survived multiple testing corrections (False Discovery Rate (FDR) = 0.0015 and 0.0422, respectively). Concurrently, 78 associations between CMs and non-endometrioid EC passed a nominal p-value significance threshold (p-value range: 0.0003–0.4997). Furthermore, 23 associations between CMs (all belonging to lipometabolomics) and non-endometrioid EC survived multiple testing corrections (FDR value range: 0.0435–0.0486). Conclusions: This analysis has identified specific CMs potentially associated with EC, especially in non-endometrioid EC. The results offer new evidence of the association between CMs and EC, including its risk factors. This information may guide the development of metabolite-based interventions for EC and its risk factors in forthcoming clinical trials and can also act as candidate targets for further mechanism exploration and drug selection.
Circulating metabolites; Mendelian randomization; Endometrial cancer; Endometrioid histology; Non-endometrioid histology; Genome-wide association studies
Hua Yang. Comprehensive analysis of the impact of circulating metabolites on the risk of endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2025. 46(6);69-81.
[1] Karpel HC, Slomovitz B, Coleman RL, Pothuri B. Treatment options for molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer in 2023. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; 35: 270–278.
[2] Sbarra M, Lupinelli M, Brook OR, Venkatesan AM, Nougaret S. Imaging of endometrial cancer. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 2023; 61: 609–625.
[3] Jamieson A, McAlpine JN. Molecular profiling of endometrial cancer from TCGA to clinical practice. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2023; 21: 210–216.
[4] Dallal CM, Lacey JV, Pfeiffer RM, Bauer DC, Falk RT, Buist DSM, et al. Estrogen metabolism and risk of postmenopausal endometrial and ovarian cancer: the B ∼ FIT cohort. Hormones and Cancer. 2016; 7: 49–64.
[5] Cornel KMC, Bongers MY, Kruitwagen RPFM, Romano A. Local estrogen metabolism (intracrinology) in endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2019; 489: 45–65.
[6] Sun L, Zhang H, Gao P. Metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic modifications on the path to cancer. Protein & Cell. 2022; 13: 877–919.
[7] Dunneram Y, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Diet, menopause and the risk of ovarian, endometrial and breast cancer. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2019; 78: 438–448.
[8] Mili N, Paschou SA, Goulis DG, Dimopoulos M, Lambrinoudaki I, Psaltopoulou T. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cancer: pathophysiological and therapeutic associations. Endocrine. 2021; 74: 478–497.
[9] Bouras E, Karhunen V, Gill D, Huang J, Haycock PC, Gunter MJ, et al. Circulating inflammatory cytokines and risk of five cancers: a Mendelian randomization analysis. BMC Medicine. 2022; 20: 3.
[10] Gu M, Chen X, Sun Y, Wan L, Shu H, Qian C. A metabolomic signature of FIGO stage I and II endometrial cancer. Neoplasma. 2021; 68: 1283–1291.
[11] Capaci V, Monasta L, Aloisio M, Sommella E, Salviati E, Campiglia P, et al. A multi-omics approach revealed common dysregulated pathways in type one and type two endometrial cancers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 16057.
[12] Raffone A, Troisi J, Boccia D, Travaglino A, Capuano G, Insabato L, et al. Metabolomics in endometrial cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2020; 99: 1135–1146.
[13] Srivastava A, Vinod PK. Identification and characterization of metabolic subtypes of endometrial cancer using a systems-level approach. Metabolites. 2023; 13: 409.
[14] Liu W, Ma J, Zhang J, Cao J, Hu X, Huang Y, et al. Identification and validation of serum metabolite biomarkers for endometrial cancer diagnosis. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2024; 16: 988–1003.
[15] O’Mara TA, Glubb DM, Amant F, Annibali D, Ashton K, Attia J, et al. Identification of nine new susceptibility loci for endometrial cancer. Nature Communications. 2018; 9: 3166.
[16] Shin SY, Fauman EB, Petersen AK, Krumsiek J, Santos R, Huang J, et al. An atlas of genetic influences on human blood metabolites. Nature Genetics. 2014; 46: 543–550.
[17] Kettunen J, Demirkan A, Würtz P, Draisma HH, Haller T, Rawal R, et al. Genome-wide study for circulating metabolites identifies 62 loci and reveals novel systemic effects of LPA. Nature Communications. 2016; 7: 11122.
[18] Borges E Jr, Montani DA, Setti AS, Zanetti BF, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A Jr, et al. Serum metabolites as predictive molecular markers of ovarian response to controlled stimulation: a pilot study. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2019; 23: 323–327.
[19] Liu HZ, Liang J, Hu AX. Type 2 diabetes mediates the causal relationship between obesity and osteomyelitis: a Mendelian randomization study. Medicine. 2024; 103: e38214.
[20] Tzeng A, Sangwan N, Jia M, Liu CC, Keslar KS, Downs-Kelly E, et al. Human breast microbiome correlates with prognostic features and immunological signatures in breast cancer. Genome Medicine. 2021; 13: 60.
[21] Dossus L, Kouloura E, Biessy C, Viallon V, Siskos AP, Dimou N, et al. Prospective analysis of circulating metabolites and endometrial cancer risk. Gynecologic Oncology. 2021; 162: 475–481.
[22] Knific T, Vouk K, Smrkolj Š, Prehn C, Adamski J, Rižner TL. Models including plasma levels of sphingomyelins and phosphatidylcholines as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of endometrial cancer. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2018; 178: 312–321.
[23] Shi K, Wang Q, Su Y, Xuan X, Liu Y, Chen W, et al. Identification and functional analyses of differentially expressed metabolites in early stage endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Science. 2018; 109: 1032–1043.
[24] Troisi J, Sarno L, Landolfi A, Scala G, Martinelli P, Venturella R, et al. Metabolomic signature of endometrial cancer. Journal of Proteome Research. 2018; 17: 804–812.
[25] Audet-Delage Y, Villeneuve L, Grégoire J, Plante M, Guillemette C. Identification of metabolomic biomarkers for endometrial cancer and its recurrence after surgery in postmenopausal women. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2018; 9: 87.
[26] Hazelwood E, Sanderson E, Tan VY, Ruth KS, Frayling TM, Dimou N, et al. Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis. BMC Medicine. 2022; 20: 125.
[27] Mullee A, Dimou N, Allen N, O’Mara T, Gunter MJ, Murphy N. Testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 and endometrial cancer risk: observational and Mendelian randomization analyses. British Journal of Cancer. 2021; 125: 1308–1317.
[28] Kennedy OJ, Bafligil C, O’Mara TA, Wang X, Evans DG, Kar S, et al. Child and adult adiposity and subtype-specific endometrial cancer risk: a multivariable Mendelian randomisation study. International Journal of Obesity. 2023; 47: 87–90.
[29] Freuer D, Linseisen J, O’Mara TA, Leitzmann M, Baurecht H, Baumeister SE, et al. Body fat distribution and risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. Cancers. 2021; 13: 5053.
[30] Li Z, Wang M, Hua M, Wang Z, Ying Y, Zhang Z, et al. Association between testosterone and cancers risk in women: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Discover Oncology. 2023; 14: 198.
[31] Guo MN, Hao XY, Tian J, Wang YC, Li JD, Fan Y, et al. Human blood metabolites and lacunar stroke: a Mendelian randomization study. International Journal of Stroke. 2023; 18: 109–116.
[32] Tan Y, Yin J, Cao J, Xie B, Zhang F, Xiong W. Genetically determined metabolites in graves disease: insight from a Mendelian randomization study. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2023; 8: bvad149.
[33] Khanna RK, Catanese S, Emond P, Corcia P, Blasco H, Pisella PJ. Metabolomics and lipidomics approaches in human tears: a systematic review. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2022; 67: 1229–1243.
[34] Feng Y, Wang R, Li C, Cai X, Huo Z, Liu Z, et al. Causal effects of genetically determined metabolites on cancers included lung, breast, ovarian cancer, and glioma: a Mendelian randomization study. Translational Lung Cancer Research. 2022; 11: 1302–1314.
[35] Draye JP, Veitch K, Vamecq J, Van Hoof F. Comparison of the metabolism of dodecanedioic acid in vivo in control, riboflavin-deficient and clofibrate-treated rats. The FEBS Journal. 1988; 178: 183–189.
[36] Jin SJ, Tserng KY. Biogenesis of dicarboxylic acids in rat liver homogenate studied by 13C labeling. American Journal of Physiology. 1991; 261: E719–E724.
[37] Hiltunen TP, Rimpelä JM, Mohney RP, Stirdivant SM, Kontula KK. Effects of four different antihypertensive drugs on plasma metabolomic profiles in patients with essential hypertension. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12: e0187729.
[38] Zhao C, Ge J, Li X, Jiao R, Li Y, Quan H, et al. Integrated metabolome analysis reveals novel connections between maternal fecal metabolome and the neonatal blood metabolome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 3660.
[39] Yoshida K, Jaochico A, Mao J, Sangaraju D. Glycochenodeoxycholate and glycodeoxycholate 3-O-glucuronides, but not hexadecanedioate and tetradecanedioate, detected weak inhibition of OATP1B caused by GDC-0810 in humans. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2023; 89: 1903–1907.
[40] Sun S, Jiao M, Han C, Zhang Q, Shi W, Shi J, et al. Causal effects of genetically determined metabolites on risk of polycystic ovary syndrome: a Mendelian randomization study. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020; 11: 621.
[41] Cao Z, Long X, Yuan L. Associations between serum metabolites and female cancers: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2024; 243: 106584.
[42] Miñambres I, Cuixart G, Gonçalves A, Corcoy R. Effects of inositol on glucose homeostasis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Nutrition. 2019; 38: 1146–1152.
[43] Facchinetti F, Bizzarri M, Benvenga S, D’Anna R, Lanzone A, Soulage C, et al. Results from the international consensus conference on myo-inositol and d-chiro-inositol in obstetrics and gynecology: the link between metabolic syndrome and PCOS. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2015; 195: 72–76.
[44] Pundir J, Psaroudakis D, Savnur P, Bhide P, Sabatini L, Teede H, et al. Inositol treatment of anovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018; 125: 299–308.
[45] Alper ECD, Coşkun ADE, Vural F. Comparison of nonspecific inflammatory markers in endometrial cancer and hyperplasia. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira. 2021; 67: 966–970.
[46] Marin AG, Filipescu AG, Petca RC, Vlădăreanu R, Petca A. Clinical correlations between serological markers and endometrial cancer. Cancers. 2024; 16: 1935.
[47] Selen S, Kilic F, Kimyon Comert G, Unsal M, Kilic C, Karalok A, et al. Can preoperative inflammatory markers differentiate endometrial cancer from complex atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2020; 46: 1148–1156.
[48] Bian X, Liu R, Meng Y, Xing D, Xu D, Lu Z. Lipid metabolism and cancer. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2021; 218: e20201606.
[49] Cheng C, Geng F, Cheng X, Guo D. Lipid metabolism reprogramming and its potential targets in cancer. Cancer Communications. 2018; 38: 27.
[50] Kho PF, Amant F, Annibali D, Ashton K, Attia J, Auer PL, et al. Mendelian randomization analyses suggest a role for cholesterol in the development of endometrial cancer. International Journal of Cancer. 2021; 148: 307–319.
[51] Yan X, Zhao W, Wei J, Yao Y, Sun G, Wang L, et al. A serum lipidomics study for the identification of specific biomarkers for endometrial polyps to distinguish them from endometrial cancer or hyperplasia. International Journal of Cancer. 2022; 150: 1549–1559.
[52] Haycock PC, Borges MC, Burrows K, Lemaitre RN, Burgess S, Khankari NK, et al. The association between genetically elevated polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of cancer. EBioMedicine. 2023; 91: 104510.
[53] Montecillo-Aguado M, Tirado-Rodriguez B, Huerta-Yepez S. The involvement of polyunsaturated fatty acids in apoptosis mechanisms and their implications in cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 11691.
[54] Cheng F, Fan W, Gui L, Liu Y, Ling Y, Huang R, et al. Serum lipidomic profiling by UHPLC-MS/MS may be able to detect early-stage endometrial cancer. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2023; 415: 1841–1854.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Top