Article Data

  • Views 242
  • Dowloads 149

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Patients with cervical cancer may under-report physical and emotional symptoms: a mixed-methods study of symptoms and quality-of-life to inform palliative care needs

  • Jaclyn A. Wall1,*,
  • Tamara Nix-Parker2
  • Marie Bakitas2,3,4

1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA

2School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA

3Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA

4Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2025.092 Vol.46,Issue 7,July 2025 pp.18-26

Submitted: 11 December 2024 Accepted: 20 February 2025

Published: 15 July 2025

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality of Life in Gynecologic Malignancies )

*Corresponding Author(s): Jaclyn A. Wall E-mail: jaclyn.wall@vcuhealth.org

Abstract

Background: Despite high physical and emotional burdens, palliative care (PC) is underutilized in cervical cancer. There are limited data exploring patient perspectives on how treatments, symptoms and side effects contribute to PC needs. We investigated treatment experiences of patients with cervical cancer to determine potential PC strategies and intervention areas. Methods: We performed a convergent mixed methods study. Eligible patients were ≥18, English-speaking, with newly (≤12 months) diagnosed cervical cancer. Participants completed semi-structured interviews followed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy survey with cervix-specific sub-scale (FACT-Cx). Interviews were de-identified, professionally transcribed and coded. Descriptive statistics were performed for demographics and treatment information. Results: 17 patients participated. Most were white (11/17, 64.7%) and received radiation (11/17, 64.7%). Central interview themes were the significant impact of physical and emotional symptoms, a desire for on-going support services during periods of illness adjustment, and the high emotional toll of cervical cancer. Median scores on functional (18/28) and emotional (17/24) domains of the FACT-Cx were lowest. Pain and fatigue were the most reported symptoms. Patients disclosed more symptoms on the FACT-Cx than in interviews, particularly regarding mental health. Conclusions: Patients with recently diagnosed and treated cervical cancer reported high physical symptom burdens, rates of anxiety and depression, and need for social support. There was discrepancy in symptom reporting between qualitative and quantitative study components. Improved symptom screening, monitoring and assessment of psychosocial symptoms, and development of enhanced social support are priority areas in developing early integrated PC in this population.


Keywords

Cervical cancer; Palliative care; Mixed methods; Quality of life


Cite and Share

Jaclyn A. Wall,Tamara Nix-Parker,Marie Bakitas. Patients with cervical cancer may under-report physical and emotional symptoms: a mixed-methods study of symptoms and quality-of-life to inform palliative care needs. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2025. 46(7);18-26.

References

[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2023; 73: 17–48.

[2] Cea García J, Rodríguez Jiménez I, Márquez Maraver F, Ríos-Pena L, Carmen Rubio Rodríguez M. Quality of life in long-term cervical cancer survivors compared with healthy women and women with benign gynecological disorders. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2024; 297: 78–85.

[3] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022; 72: 7–33.

[4] Ye S, Yang J, Cao D, Lang J, Shen K. A systematic review of quality of life and sexual function of patients with cervical cancer after treatment. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2014; 24: 1146–1157.

[5] Ferrandina G, Mantegna G, Petrillo M, Fuoco G, Venditti L, Terzano S, et al. Quality of life and emotional distress in early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer patients: a prospective, longitudinal study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 124: 389–394.

[6] Herzog TJ, Wright JD. The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life—the components and means for management. Gynecologic Oncology. 2007; 107: 572–577.

[7] Kirchheiner K, Pötter R, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC, Haie-Meder C, Petrič P, et al. Health-related quality of life in locally advanced cervical cancer patients after definitive chemoradiation therapy including image guided adaptive brachytherapy: an analysis from the EMBRACE study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2016; 94: 1088–1098.

[8] Kumar S, Rana ML, Verma K, Singh N, Sharma AK, Maria AK, et al. PrediQt-Cx: post treatment health related quality of life prediction model for cervical cancer patients. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9: e89851.

[9] von Gruenigen VE, Daly BJ. Futility: clinical decisions at the end-of-life in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005; 97: 638–644.

[10] Lopez-Acevedo M, Havrilesky LJ, Broadwater G, Kamal AH, Abernethy AP, Berchuck A, et al. Timing of end-of-life care discussion with performance on end-of-life quality indicators in ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 130: 156–161.

[11] Lewin SN, Buttin BM, Powell MA, Gibb RK, Rader JS, Mutch DG, et al. Resource utilization for ovarian cancer patients at the end of life: how much is too much? Gynecologic Oncology. 2005; 99: 261–266.

[12] Roberts JA, Brown D, Elkins T, Larson DB. Factors influencing views of patients with gynecologic cancer about end-of-life decisions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997; 176: 166–172.

[13] Fauci J, Schneider K, Walters C, Boone J, Whitworth J, Killian E, et al. The utilization of palliative care in gynecologic oncology patients near the end of life. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 127: 175–179.

[14] Hay CM, Lefkowits C, Crowley-Matoka M, Bakitas MA, Clark LH, Duska LR, et al. Gynecologic oncologist views influencing referral to outpatient specialty palliative care. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2017; 27: 588–596.

[15] Hay CM, Lefkowits C, Crowley-Matoka M, Bakitas MA, Clark LH, Duska LR, et al. Strategies for introducing outpatient specialty palliative care in gynecologic oncology. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2017; 13: e712–e720.

[16] Sanders BS, Burkett TL, Dickinson GE, Tournier RE. Hospice referral decisions: the role of physicians. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 2004; 21: 196–202.

[17] Cripe J, Mills K, Kuroki L, Wan L, Hagemann A, Fuh K, et al. Gynecologic oncologists’ perceptions of palliative care and associated barriers: a survey of the society of gynecologic oncology. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2019; 84: 50–55.

[18] Wentlandt K, Krzyzanowska MK, Swami N, Rodin G, Le LW, Sung L, et al. Referral practices of pediatric oncologists to specialized palliative care. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2014; 22: 2315–2322.

[19] Salyer C, Littell RD, Pearl ML, Brown AJ, Popowich S, Lefkowits C, et al. Palliative care in gynecologic oncology: a narrative review of current literature and vision for the future. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2022; 11: 3542–3554.

[20] Persenaire C, Spinosa DL, Brubaker LW, Lefkowits CJ. Incorporation of palliative care in gynecologic oncology. Current Oncology Reports. 2023; 25: 1295–1305.

[21] Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1993; 11: 570–579.

[22] Vistad I, Fosså SD, Dahl AA. A critical review of patient-rated quality of life studies of long-term survivors of cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2006; 102: 563–572.

[23] Ashing-Giwa KT, Lim JW, Tang J. Surviving cervical cancer: does health-related quality of life influence survival? Gynecologic Oncology. 2010; 118: 35–42.

[24] Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005; 15: 1277–1288.

[25] Bradley S, Rose S, Lutgendorf S, Costanzo E, Anderson B. Quality of life and mental health in cervical and endometrial cancer survivors. Gynecologic Oncology. 2006; 100: 479–486.

[26] Sorokin P, Kulikova S, Nikiforchin A, Ulrikh E. Impact of various treatment modalities on long-term quality of life in cervical cancer survivors. Cureus. 2024; 16: e68642.

[27] Brodeur MN, Dejean R, Beauchemin MC, Samouëlian V, Cormier B, Bacha OM, et al. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2021; 162: 277–283.

[28] Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2006; 95: S43–S103.

[29] Tokarski AO, Bernardelli RS, Bruscato JR, Lucena CR, Linhares JC, Tsunoda AT. Quality of life post cervical cancer treatment: a comparison between radical surgery approach and radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2024; 130: 904–912.

[30] Hoppenot C, Littell RD, DeEulis T, Hartenbach EM. Top ten tips palliative care clinicians should know about caring for patients with cervical cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2021; 24: 438–442.

[31] Pozzar RA, Wall JA, Tavormina A, Thompson E, Enzinger AC, Matulonis UA, et al. Experiences of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis-related complex care needs and their caregivers. Gynecologic Oncology. 2023; 181: 68–75.

[32] Maguire R, Kotronoulas G, Simpson M, Paterson C. A systematic review of the supportive care needs of women living with and beyond cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2015; 136: 478–490.

[33] Jeppesen MM, Mogensen O, Dehn P, Jensen PT. Needs and priorities of women with endometrial and cervical cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015; 36: 122–132.

[34] Toubassi D, Himel D, Winton S, Nyhof-Young J. The informational needs of newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients who will be receiving combined chemoradiation treatment. Journal of Cancer Education. 2006; 21: 263–268.

[35] Dos Santos LN, Castaneda L, de Aguiar SS, Thuler LCS, Koifman RJ, Bergmann A. Health-related quality of life in women with cervical cancer. Brazilian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2019; 41: 242–248.

[36] Fernandes WC, Kimura M. Health related quality of life of women with cervical cancer. Latin American Journal of Nursing. 2010; 18: 360–367.

[37] Peerawong T, Suphasynth Y, Kongkamol C, Rordlamool P, Bridhikitti J, Jiratrachu R, et al. Validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy with cervical cancer subscale (FACT-CX) for quality of life in Thai patients prior to chemoradiotherapy. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2020; 21: 1891–1897.

[38] Osann K, Hsieh S, Nelson EL, Monk BJ, Chase D, Cella D, et al. Factors associated with poor quality of life among cervical cancer survivors: implications for clinical care and clinical trials. Gynecologic Oncology. 2014; 135: 266–272.

[39] Bechthold AC, Azuero A, Pisu M, Pierce JY, Williams GR, Taylor RA, et al. The Project ENABLE Cornerstone randomized controlled trial: study protocol for a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for African American and rural-dwelling advanced cancer family caregivers. Trials. 2022; 23: 452.

[40] National Institutes of Health. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Cervical Cancer. 2023. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html (Accessed: 02 January 2024).


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top